Capacitative Ca²⁺ entry is involved in ACh-induced distal colon smooth muscle contraction in rats / 生理学报

Contraction of smooth muscle cells is triggered by an increase in cytosolic Ca(2+) upon agonist stimulation. Ca(2+) influx across the plasma membrane constitutes a major component of the agonist-induced response in smooth muscle cells. Traditionally, voltage-operated Ca(2+) channel (VOCC) is considered as the channel mediating the Ca(2+) entry. However, this view has been challenged by recent discoveries, which demonstrated that other types of ion channels, such as store-operated and/or receptor-operated Ca(2+) channels (SOCC and/or ROCC), also participate in Ca(2+) response induced by agonists in smooth muscle cells. SOCC is defined as the channel activated in response to the depletion of the internal Ca(2+) stores, an event secondary to G protein coupled receptor or receptor tyrosine kinase stimulation. The Ca(2+) flow mediated by SOCC is termed as capacitative Ca(2+) entry (CCE). Previous study from other group has demonstrated that VOCC played a predominant role in ACh-induced contraction of distal colon smooth muscle in guinea pig. However, whether SOCC participates in the agonist-induced contractile response in this particular tissue is unknown. The present study was performed to investigate the role of CCE in ACh-induced mechanical activity of distal colon smooth muscle in rats. The contractile function of the smooth muscle was assessed by measuring isometric force of isolated rat distal colon rings. We showed that both high extracellular K(+) (40 mmol/L) and ACh (5 mumol/L) evoked striking contraction of the smooth muscle. The contractile responses were almost abolished by removal of extracellular Ca(2+) with ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N',N' tetraacetic acid (EGTA), suggesting a critical contribution of extracellular source of Ca(2+) to the contraction. Verapamil (5 mumol/L), an L-type VOCC blocker, significantly attenuated, but didn't completely eliminate the high K(+)- and ACh-induced contraction (74% and 41% for high K(+) and ACh, respectively), indicating that additional channels might be involved in the contractile mechanism. Furthermore, ACh only induced transient contractions in the absence of extracellular Ca(2+). Readmission of Ca(2+) into the extracellular compartment resulted in a significant and sustained increase in the tension of the smooth muscle. This response was not affected by verapamil (5 mumol/L) and Cd(2+) (5 mumol/L), both of which efficiently block VOCC at the doses. However, La(3+), a known inhibitor of SOCC, significantly suppressed the Ca(2+) readdition-induced contraction in a dose-dependent manner. On the basis of these results, we conclude that contraction of smooth muscle in the distal colon is regulated by multiple Ca(2+) channels. In addition to VOCC-mediated Ca(2+) influx, SOCC-mediated CCE participates in agonist-induced contractile response of distal colon smooth muscle in rats.

Store-operated Ca2+ channels in rat colonic smooth muscle cells / 中国应用生理学杂志

<p><b>AIM</b>To study whether store-operated Ca2+ channel (SOC) is present in rat colonic smooth muscle cells.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) changes induced by thapsigargin- or caffeine-activated SOC channel were measured in enzymatically dissociated rat colonic smooth muscle cells with the fluorescent indicator Fura-2/AM.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In the absence of external Ca2+ , the sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ pump inhibitor thapsigargin (1 micromol/L) and ryanodine receptor (RyR) activator caffeine both transiently elevated [Ca2+]i from (68.32 +/- 3.43) nmol/L to (240.85 +/- 12.65 ) nmol/L, (481.25 +/- 34.77) nmol/L. A subsequent reintroduction of Ca2+ into the extracellular solution resulted in [Ca2+]i further elevated to (457.55 +/- 19.80) nmol/L, (1005.93 +/- 54.62) nmol/L; (643.88 +/- 34.65) nmol/L, (920.16 +/- 43.25) nmol/L, respectively. And the elevated response was blocked by lanthanum (1 mmol/L), but was insensitive to L-type voltage calcium channels blocker verapamil and membrane depolarization.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>SOC activated by store depletion are present in rat colonic smooth muscle cells. And we further prove the existence of such Ca2+ channels in excitable cells.</p>

Bombesin-mediated non-cholinergic late slow excitatory postsynaptic potentials in guinea pig inferior mesenteric ganglion in vitro / 生理学报

The effect of bombesin (BOM) on non-cholinergic excitatory synaptic transmission of the guinea pig inferior mesenteric ganglion (IMG) was investigated by intracellular recording. Repetitive stimulation of the colon nerves (1 ms, 25 Hz, 4 s) elicited a burst of action potentials, which was followed by a long-lasting depolarization in 74.3% (52/70) of the IMG neurons. The depolarization was not blocked by nicotinic (d-tubocurarine, 100 micromol/L) and muscarinic (atropine, 1 micromol/L) antagonists, but was eliminated in a low Ca(2+)/high Mg(2+) Krebs solution, indicating that the depolarization was due to the release of non-cholinergic transmitters. Superfusing the ganglia with BOM (10 micromol/L, 1 min) induced a slow depolarization in 66.5% (109/164) neurons tested. The BOM response was not appreciably changed in low Ca(2+)/high Mg(2+) Krebs solution (n=6, P>0.05), suggesting that BOM depolarized the neurons by acting directly on the postsynaptic membrane rather than via a release of other endogenous depolarizing substances. In a total of 102 cells that exhibited late slow excitatory postsynaptic potential (ls-EPSP), superfusion of the ganglia with BOM produced a membrane depolarization in 82 neurons (80%), while the remaining 20 cells (20%) exhibited no response to BOM. In 18 neurons with ls-EPSP, 4 (22%) neurons were sensitive to both BOM and SP; 6 (33%) and 5 (28%) neurons were only sensitive to BOM and SP, respectively. The remaining 3 (17%) neurons were insensitive to both BOM and SP. Membrane resistance (Rm) had no apparent change in 47.3%, 59.5 % of the neurons tested during the ls-EPSP (n=55) and BOM depolarization (n=84), respectively, but had a marked decrease in 38.2%, 27.4%, and a marked increase in the remaining 14.5%, 13.1% of the neurons. However, when the Rm change accompanying ls-EPSP was compared with that accompanying BOM depolarization (n=20) in the same neuron, the changes in Rm were always parallel. Moreover, ls-EPSP (n=6) and BOM depolarization (n=8) were all augmented by conditioning hyperpolarization. The extrapolated values of the reversal potentials of ls-EPSP and BOM depolarization were 46.0+/-8.0 and 50.0+/-7.0 mV (n=8, P>0.05), respectively. In 14 BOM-sensitive neurons, a ls-EPSP was elicited by repetitive colon nerve stimulation. Superfusion of BOM (10 micromol/L) in these cells initially caused a large depolarization and then membrane potential gradually subsided to resting level in the continuous presence of BOM. Stimulation of the presynaptic nerves at this time failed to elicit a detecable ls-EPSP in 2 neurons and induced a much smaller one in 10 cells, while the ls-EPSP in the remaining 2 neurons was not appreciably affected. On the other hand, prolonged superfusion of BOM had no effect on the amplitude and duration of ls-EPSP in 6 BOM-insensititive neurons studied (P>0.05). The amplitude and duration of SP-induced depolarization were not altered by prolonged superfusion of BOM (n=4, P>0.05) Superfusion of tyr(4) D-phe(12) bombesin (1 micromol/L, 10 15 min), a BOM receptor antagonist, did not cause any noticeable changes in passive membrane properties nor block nicotinic f-EPSPs, but markedly suppressed (n=5) or completely abolished (n=11) BOM depolarization in all 16 neurons tested Similarly, tyr(4) D-phe(12) bombesin partially or completely antagonized the ls-EPSP in 9 out of a total of BOM sensitive neurons (n=11). The ls-EPSP elicited in the remaining two neurons was insignificantly affected by this drug. However, following 10 20 min of wash with Krebs solution the ls-EPSP was reversed. In contrast, superfusion of the ganglia with tyr(4) D-phe(12) bombesin did not change the amplitude and duration (P>0.05) of ls-EPSP in 10 BOM-insensitive cells. Similarly, the amplitude and duration of SP-induced depolarization were not appreciably affected by tyr(4) D-phe(12) bombesin (n=6, P>0.05). In conclusion, our results indicate that BOM may be another transmitter mediating the ls-EPSP in the guinea pig IMG and that there is no cross-desensitization of BOM receptors and SP receptors.