RESUMEN
Objective To analyze the cost-benefit ratio of primary trigeminal neuralgia patients with bad drug control and never accepted the surgical treatment through surgery [including microvascular decompression (MVD) ,percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy (RFR) ,stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS)] .Methods A total of 89 patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia who under-went surgical treatment for the first time from 2005 to 2013 were enrolled in this study ,including 27 patients with MVD ,23 patients with RFR and 39 patients with SRS .Evaluation criteria (effect factors) include facial pain (excellent :no pain and no drug treat-ment ;good :no pain but medication ;worse:less than 50% of patients with pain ;worse:more than 50% of patients with facial pain or need to undergo secondary surgery ) ,numbness ,cost and .Results The mean age of the patients treated with MVD was (50 .4 ± 14 .3)years old ,RFR was(73 .2 ± 13 .6) years old SRS was (72 .6 ± 11 .8) years old ,MVD group was younger than RFR and SRS group(P<0 .05);The average total cost of each surgical approach as follows :MVD was 50274 yuan ,RFR was 4539 yuan ,SRS was 38512 yuan (P<0 .05);The postoperative facial numbness proportion of MVD was 1 .1% ,RFR was 52 .2% and SRS was 28 .2% (P<0 .05);The ratio of patients who needed recurrent surgery in two years was MVD 26 .0% ,RFR 73 .9% and SRS 30 .7% (P<0 .05);The mean remission rate of MVD was 1 .6 years ,the RFR was 2 .1 years ,and the SRS was 1 .0 year(P<0 .05);The cost-benefit ratio of MVD was 31618 yuan ,RFR was 1982 yuan ,SRS was 39297 yuan(P<0 .05) .Conclusion The cost-ben-efit ratio of the three surgical from low to high were RFR ,MVD ,SRS ,which means the unit cost of RFR gain the highest ,followed by M VD and SRS .
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the treatment effect of surgically clipping anterior circulation aneurysms by lateral supraorbital approach and supraorbital keyhole approach for guiding the selection of surgical approach for anterior circulation aneurysms.Methods The clinical data of 80 patients diagnosed as anterior circulation aneurysms due to spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage from January 2011 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed,including the operation time,craniotomy time,cranial closure time,estimated intraoperative blood loss,HCT change before and after surgery,early ambulation time,postoperative hospitalization days,GCS scores at admission and discharge,GOS scores at discharge were compared between the two groups and the literatures were reviewed.Results The operation time and craniotomy time of the lateral supraorbital approach were less than those of the supraorbital keyhole approach,and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P＜0.05);the cranial closure time,estimated intraoperative blood loss,HCT change before and after surgery,early ambulation time,postoperative hospitalization days,GCS scores at admission and discharge and GOS scores at discharge had no statistical differences between the two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion The lateral supraorbital approach has the advantages of shorter operation time and craniotomy time,providing a better surgical field during operation,less intraoperative traction and less postoperative complications,and can serve as an alternative scheme for the supraorbital keyhole approach in clipping anterior circulation aneurysms.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the treatment effect of surgically clipping anterior circulation aneurysms by lateral supraorbital approach and supraorbital keyhole approach for guiding the selection of surgical approach for anterior circulation aneurysms.Methods The clinical data of 80 patients diagnosed as anterior circulation aneurysms due to spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage from January 2011 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed,including the operation time,craniotomy time,cranial closure time,estimated intraoperative blood loss,HCT change before and after surgery,early ambulation time,postoperative hospitalization days,GCS scores at admission and discharge,GOS scores at discharge were compared between the two groups and the literatures were reviewed.Results The operation time and craniotomy time of the lateral supraorbital approach were less than those of the supraorbital keyhole approach,and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P＜0.05);the cranial closure time,estimated intraoperative blood loss,HCT change before and after surgery,early ambulation time,postoperative hospitalization days,GCS scores at admission and discharge and GOS scores at discharge had no statistical differences between the two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion The lateral supraorbital approach has the advantages of shorter operation time and craniotomy time,providing a better surgical field during operation,less intraoperative traction and less postoperative complications,and can serve as an alternative scheme for the supraorbital keyhole approach in clipping anterior circulation aneurysms.