Bortezomib in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary care center in India.

INTRODUCTION: Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor in myeloma. There is a paucity of data from India regarding the efficacy and tolerance to bortezomib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma from January 2008 to December 2011 treated with bortezomib as the first‑line therapy were studied in a retrospective analysis. The primary end point was the overall rate of response. Secondary end points were the progression free survival (PFS), reversibility of renal compromise and safety of bortezomib. RESULTS: Our study included 41 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. The overall response to bortezomib was 88.5% (complete response [CR] 31.4%, very good partial response 34.2%, partial response [PR] 22.8%). A renal response (CR renal, PR renal or Minimal Response renal combined) was documented 96.2% patients with initial renal impairment. The median time to the first renal response was 21 days. 17 patients (41.4%) had severe toxicity (Grade 3 and 4). Bortezomib induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN) was the most common toxicity seen (53.6%) and the most common cause for discontinuation of therapy. At a median follow‑up of 9 months, median PFS was not reached. DISCUSSION: The results obtained in our study are comparable with those of established studies on bortezomib. Our patient population has similar responses and renal reversibility patterns. However, they are at an increased susceptibility to BIPN, leading to discontinuation of therapy. CONCLUSION: Bortezomib as first‑line therapy has a good efficacy and safety.

Standard operating procedure for audio visual recording of informed consent: An initiative to facilitate regulatory compliance.

The office of the Drugs Controller General (India) vide order dated 19th November 2013 has made audio visual (AV) recording of the informed consent mandatory for the conduct of all clinical trials in India. We therefore developed a standard operating procedure (SOP) to ensure that this is performed in compliance with the regulatory requirements, internationally accepted ethical standards and that the recording is stored as well as archived in an appropriate manner. The SOP was developed keeping in mind all relevant orders, regulations, laws and guidelines and have been made available online. Since, we are faced with unique legal and regulatory requirements that are unprecedented globally, this SOP will allow the AV recording of the informed consent to be performed, archived and retrieved to demonstrate ethical, legal and regulatory compliance. We also compared this to the draft guidelines for AV recording dated 9th January 2014 developed by Central Drugs Standard Control Organization. Our future efforts will include regular testing, feedback and update of the SOP.

Efficacy of rasburicase (recombinant urate oxidase) in the prevention and treatment of malignancy-associated hyperuricemia: An Indian experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematological malignancies that are highly proliferative and have high tumor burden are at high risk of developing hyperuricemia and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), spontaneously and while undergoing chemotherapy. AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of a new generic formulation of recombinant rasburicase in prevention and treatment of malignancy‑associated hyperuricemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An open‑label, multicenter, phase‑III study was conducted on 100 eligible patients with high risk for TLS. Rasburicase was administered 0.2 mg/kg intravenously over 30 min, daily, for 4 days. The outcome measures were percentage of reduction in plasma uric acid at 4 h after rasburicase, plasma uric acid area under the curve (AUC)0-96 h and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Eighty eight patients completed the study period of 10 days. After rasburicase administration, there was a 75.3 ± 28.5% of reduction in plasma uric acid at 4 h as compared to baseline. The plasma uric acid AUC0-96 h was 259.9 ± 215.5 mg/dL h. Safety of rasburicase was assessed on the basis of changes in vitals, hematological, and biochemical parameters from baseline to termination. Except for the plasma uric acid level, there was no significant difference in any of the parameters. Mild to moderate adverse events were reported in 29 patients. Three patients had serious adverse events (SAEs) unrelated to rasburicase. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that recombinant rasburicase that is indigenously developed is effective for prevention and management of hyperuricemia in patients who are at high risk of developing TLS.

Is there a positive effect of participation on a clinical trial for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

BACKGROUND: There is general belief that patients who enrolled on a clinical trial have better outcomes compared to those who are treated outside of a trial. We analyzed if there was a 'trial effect' for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of cohorts of patients with advanced NSCLC who received chemotherapy inside and outside of a clinical trial were analyzed for response rates (RR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 1 and 2 year survival. RESULTS: There were 194 patients who received chemotherapy of which, 54 were on a clinical trial and 140 outside of it. For the whole group, the RR, median PFS, OS, one and two-year survivals were 35.4%, six months (range, 2-70), seven months (range, 2-72), 29.8% and 9.7% respectively. The differences in RR and PFS of patients who were treated inside and outside of a clinical trial were not significant (P=0.6164, 0.0881). The differences in median OS and one-year survivals between the groups were significant (P=0.0052, 0.022). For the whole group, patients who received II line chemotherapy had better OS (P< or = 0.0001). More patients in the trial group received II line chemotherapy (P=0.0004).The difference in the median OS between the groups continued to be significant even after patients who received II line chemotherapy were censored (P=0.0437). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated inside of a clinical trial had better OS compared to those who were treated outside of it.