RESUMEN
Purpose@#We investigated the impact of four types of antihypertensive medications, angiotensinreceptor blockers (ARBs), beta blockers (BBs; both selective and non-selective), calciumchannel blockers (CCBs), and thiazide diuretics (TDs) on survival outcomes in epithelial ovariancancer (EOC). @*Materials and Methods@#A single-institutional retrospective chart review of 878 patients with EOC was performed.Survival was compared according to use of the four antihypertensive medications duringprimary treatment. Propensity score matching (ratio 1:3) was performed to control possibleassociated covariates, such as age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetricsstage, residual status after primary debulking surgery, and co-morbidity. @*Results@#Among 878 patients, 56 patients (6.4%) were ARB users, 62 (7.1%) were BB users, 107(12.2%) were CCBs users and 32 (3.6%) used TDs. Median progression-free survival (PFS)for ARB, BB, and CCB users was 37.8, 27.2, and 23.6 months compared with 33.6 monthsfor non-users. ARB was associated with 35% decreased risk of disease progression (hazardratio [HR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.99; p=0.046) in multivariate analysis.After propensity score matching, median PFS for ARB users was 37.8 months and ARBuse remained to be associated with lower recurrence rate in univariate (p=0.035) and multivariateanalysis (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.93; p=0.022). @*Conclusion@#In this study, ARBs use during primary treatment is associated with lower recurrence in EOCpatients. However, CCBs, BBs, and TDs did not show beneficial impact.
RESUMEN
Purpose@#Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancerthat was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognosticsignificance of LNM differs according to disease status. @*Materials and Methods@#Patients with FIGO stage IB or higher cervical cancer who had pretreatment computedtomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging studies as well as long-term follow-upwere enrolled in this retrospective study. The hazard ratio (HR) of Cox regression was usedto determine the prognostic significance of LNM. The HRs were compared between the differenttumor groups (based on stage, histology, tumor size, primary treatment, age, parametriuminvolvement, and lymphovascular space invasion). @*Results@#A total of 970 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2007 were included.The pretreatment LNM had prognostic significance in patients with stage IB1/IIA (HR forprogression-free survival 2.10, p=0.001; HR for overall survival 1.99, p=0.005). However,the significance gradually decreased or disappeared with advancing stages. Similarly, theprognostic significance of the pretreatment LNM decreased with advancing disease status,including old age, parametrial involvement or lymphovascular space involvement. In contrast,the tumor size was associated with the prognostic significance of LNM with advancingstatus. The significance of the clinical LNM did not reflect the significance of the clinicalstage. In contrast, the tumor size, parametrial involvement, and significance of the pathologicLNM reflected the clinical stage. @*Conclusion@#In patients with cervical cancer, pretreatment LNM on imaging has different clinical significancedepending on the tumor status.
RESUMEN
Purpose@#We aimed to develop and validate individual prognostic models in a large cohort of cervical cancer patients that were primarily treated with radical hysterectomy. @*Materials and Methods@#We analyzed 1,441 patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated between 2000 and 2008 from the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group multi-institutional cohort: a train cohort (n=788) and a test cohort (n=653). Models predicting the risk for overall survival (OS), disease- free survival (DFS), lymphatic recurrence and hematogenous recurrence were developed using Cox analysis and stepwise backward selection and best-model options. The prognostic performance of each model was assessed in an independent patient cohort. Model-classified risk groups were compared to groups based on traditional risk factors. @*Results@#Independent risk factors for OS, DFS, lymphatic recurrence, and hematogenous recurrence were identified for prediction model development. Different combinations of risk factors were shown for each outcome with best predictive value. In train cohort, area under the curve (AUC) at 2 and 5 years were 0.842/0.836 for recurrence, and 0.939/0.882 for OS. When applied to a test cohort, the model also showed accurate prediction result (AUC at 2 and 5 years were 0.799/0.723 for recurrence, and 0.844/0.806 for OS, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier plot by proposed model-classified risk groups showed more distinctive survival differences between each risk group. @*Conclusion@#We developed prognostic models for OS, DFS, lymphatic and hematogenous recurrence in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Combining weighted clinicopathologic factors, the proposed model can give more individualized predictions in clinical practice.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the possible prognostic factors in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS). METHODS: This study retrospectively investigated 50 patients with uterine LMS treated at the Samsung Medical Center between 2001 and 2017. To analyze the prognostic significance of factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and survival after recurrence, the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used for univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients, 30 (60.0%) experienced recurrence and 16 (32.0%) died within a median follow-up period of 21 (range, 3–99) months. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age, absence of residual tumor after surgery, lower mitotic count, and a history of adjuvant radiotherapy at first treatment were significantly associated with better RFS. Presence of residual tumor after surgery and severe nuclear atypia were associated with poor OS. In the analysis of survival after recurrence, hematogenous recurrence, severe nuclear atypia, and presence of residual tumor at primary surgery were significantly associated with worse prognosis. Notably, residual tumor status at primary surgery was associated with RFS, OS, and survival after recurrence. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the possible prognostic factors for RFS, OS, and survival after recurrence for patients with LMS. These results may provide useful information for patients with LMS.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Leiomiosarcoma , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasia Residual , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias UterinasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: BRCA mutational status is important in the management of ovarian cancer, but there is a lack of evidence supporting genetic testing in Asian populations. This study was performed to investigate the prevalence and prognostic outcomes of BRCA1/2 mutation and variant of unknown significance (VUS) in Korean patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: Among patients newly diagnosed with EOC between January 2007 and January 2017, those tested for germline BRCA1/2 mutation were studied, regardless of family history. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the patients with and without BRCA1/2 mutation and VUS. RESULTS: A total of 313 patients underwent BRCA testing: 88 patients had a BRCA1/2 mutation and 48 patients had a BRCA1/2 VUS (28.1% and 15.3%, respectively). There were no significant associations between BRCA1/2 mutation, BRCA1/2 wild-type, or BRCA1/2 VUS with age at diagnosis, histologic distribution, or residual disease status after primary cytoreductive surgery. BRCA1 mutation, including BRCA1 VUS, showed no difference in PFS or OS compared to BRCA1 wild-type. In contrast, BRCA2 mutation showed longer PFS than that of BRCA2 wild-type (P=0.04) or BRCA2 VUS (P=0.02). BRCA2 mutation, including BRCA2 VUS, did not show any difference in OS compared to BRCA2 wild-type. CONCLUSION: BRCA mutation and BRCA VUS had similar clinical characteristics and survival outcomes, except that BRCA2 mutation showed better PFS. The results of this study will help to understand the prognostic significance of BRCA mutation and VUS in Korean patients.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Pueblo Asiatico , Diagnóstico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Pruebas Genéticas , Corea (Geográfico) , Neoplasias Ováricas , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a new prognostic classification for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients using gradient boosting (GB) and to compare the accuracy of the prognostic model with the conventional statistical method. METHODS: Information of EOC patients from Samsung Medical Center (training cohort, n=1,128) was analyzed to optimize the prognostic model using GB. The performance of the final model was externally validated with patient information from Asan Medical Center (validation cohort, n=229). The area under the curve (AUC) by the GB model was compared to that of the conventional Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (CoxPHR) model. RESULTS: In the training cohort, the AUC of the GB model for predicting second year overall survival (OS), with the highest target value, was 0.830 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.802–0.853). In the validation cohort, the GB model also showed high AUC of 0.843 (95% CI=0.833–0.853). In comparison, the conventional CoxPHR method showed lower AUC (0.668 (95% CI=0.617–0.719) for the training cohort and 0.597 (95% CI=0.474–0.719) for the validation cohort) compared to GB. New classification according to survival probability scores of the GB model identified four distinct prognostic subgroups that showed more discriminately classified prediction than the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system. CONCLUSION: Our novel GB-guided classification accurately identified the prognostic subgroups of patients with EOC and showed higher accuracy than the conventional method. This approach would be useful for accurate estimation of individual outcomes of EOC patients.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Área Bajo la Curva , Antígeno Ca-125 , Clasificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Ginecología , Aprendizaje Automático , Métodos , Obstetricia , Neoplasias Ováricas , PronósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate survival impact of low anterior resection (LAR) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) grossly confined to the pelvis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 397 patients who underwent primary staging surgery for treatment of 2014 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II–IIIA EOC: 116 (29.2%) IIA, 212 (53.4%) IIB, and 69 (17.4%) IIIA. Patients with grossly enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes positive for metastatic carcinoma were excluded. Of 92 patients (23.2%) with gross tumors at the rectosigmoid colon, 68 (73.9%) underwent tumorectomy and 24 (26.1%), LAR for rectosigmoid lesions. Survival outcomes between patients who underwent tumorectomy and LAR were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 55 months (range, 1–260), 141 (35.5%) recurrences and 81 (20.4%) deaths occurred. Age (52.8 vs. 54.5 years, p=0.552), optimal debulking (98.5% vs. 95.0%, p=0.405), histologic type (serous, 52.9% vs. 50.0%, p=0.804), FIGO stage (p=0.057), and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy ≥6 cycles (85.3% vs. 79.2%, p=0.485) were not different between groups. No significant difference in 5-year progression-free survival (PFS; 57.9% vs. 62.5%, p=0.767) and overall survival (OS; 84.7% vs. 63.8%, p=0.087), respectively, was noted between groups. Postoperative ileus was more frequent in patients subjected to LAR than those who were not (4/24 [16.7%] vs. 11/373 [2.9%], p=0.001). The 5-year PFS (60.3% vs. 57.9%, p=0.523) and OS (81.8% vs. 87.7%, p=0.912) between patients who underwent tumorectomy and those who did not were also similar. CONCLUSION: Survival benefit of LAR did not appear to be significant in EOC patients with grossly pelvis-confined tumors.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Colectomía , Colon , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ginecología , Ileus , Ganglios Linfáticos , Obstetricia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Pelvis , Recurrencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation is to compare outcomes of patients according to the presence of cancer arising from endometriosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EC). METHODS: This study retrospectively investigated 224 CCC and EC patients treated in Samsung Medical Center from 2001 to 2015 to identify cancer arising from endometriosis according to Sampson and Scott criteria. Propensity score matching was performed to compare patients arising from endometriosis to patients without endometriosis (ratio 1:1) according to stage, age, lymph node metastasis (LNM), cancer antigen (CA)-125 level, and residual status after debulking surgery. RESULTS: Forty-five cases arising from endometriosis were compared with 179 cases without endometriosis. CCC and EC arising from endometriosis tended to present with early age (mean, 45.2 vs. 49.2 years; p=0.003), early-stage (stages I and II, 92.7% vs. 62.3%; p < 0.001), lower CA-125 level (mean, 307.1 vs. 556.7; p=0.041), higher percentages of no gross residual disease after surgery (87.8% vs.56.8%; p=0.001), and higher percentages of negative LNM (82.9% vs. 59.0%; p=0.008) compared to cases without endometriosis. Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) showed better outcomes for groups with cancer arising from endometriosis (p=0.014 for PFS; and p=0.010 for OS). However, the association with endometriosis was not significant in multivariate analysis. Also, after propensity score matching, survival differences between the 2 groups were not significant. CONCLUSION: CCC and EC arising from endometriosis are diagnosed at an earlier age and stage. However, cancer arising from endometriosis was not a significant prognostic factor.
Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Carcinoma Endometrioide , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Endometriosis , Ganglios Linfáticos , Análisis Multivariante , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We aimed to develop molecular classifier that can predict lymphatic invasion and their clinical significance in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed gene expression (mRNA, methylated DNA) in data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. To identify molecular signatures for lymphatic invasion, we found differentially expressed genes. The performance of classifier was validated by receiver operating characteristics analysis, logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and support vector machine (SVM). We assessed prognostic role of classifier using random survival forest (RSF) model and pathway deregulation score (PDS). For external validation, we analyzed microarray data from 26 EOC samples of Samsung Medical Center and curatedOvarianData database. RESULTS: We identified 21 mRNAs, and seven methylated DNAs from primary EOC tissues that predicted lymphatic invasion and created prognostic models. The classifier predicted lymphatic invasion well, which was validated by logistic regression, LDA, and SVM algorithm (C-index of 0.90, 0.71, and 0.74 for mRNA and C-index of 0.64, 0.68, and 0.69 for DNA methylation). Using RSF model, incorporating molecular data with clinical variables improved prediction of progression-free survival compared with using only clinical variables (p < 0.001 and p=0.008). Similarly, PDS enabled us to classify patients into high-risk and low-risk group, which resulted in survival difference in mRNA profiles (log-rank p-value=0.011). In external validation, gene signature was well correlated with prediction of lymphatic invasion and patients' survival. CONCLUSION: Molecular signature model predicting lymphatic invasion was well performed and also associated with survival of EOC patients.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , ADN , Bosques , Expresión Génica , Genoma , Genoma Humano , Modelos Logísticos , Metástasis Linfática , Neoplasias Ováricas , ARN Mensajero , Curva ROC , Máquina de Vectores de Soporte , TranscriptomaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with etoposide and ifosfamide (ETI) in the management of pretreated recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: Patients with recurrent or persistent EOC who had measurable disease and at least one chemotherapy regimen were to receive etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m²/day intravenous (IV) on days 1 to 3 in combination with ifosfamide 1 g/m²/day IV on days 1 to 5, every 21 days. RESULTS: From August 2008 to August 2016, 66 patients were treated with ETI regimen. Most patients were heavily pretreated prior to ETI: 53 (80.3%) patients had received 3 or more chemotherapy regimens. The response rate (RR) of ETI chemotherapy was 18.2% and median duration of response was 6.8 months (range, 0–30). Median survival of all patients was 5 months at a median follow up of 7.2 months. Platinum-free interval (PFI) more than 6 months prior to ETI has statistically significant correlation with overall survival (OS; 9.2 vs. 5.6 months; P=0.029) and RR (34.5% vs. 5.4%; P < 0.010). However, treatment free interval before ETI, number of prior chemotherapy regimen, and optimality of primary surgery did not show significant difference for RR or OS. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities were observed in 7 cases (3%) of the 232 cycles of ETI. CONCLUSION: The ETI combination regimen shows comparatively low toxicity and modest activity in heavily pretreated recurrent or persistent EOC patients with more than 6 months of PFI after last platinum treatment.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Quimioterapia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Etopósido , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ifosfamida , Neoplasias Ováricas , Platino (Metal) , Recurrencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We compared survival outcomes of advanced serous type epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients with normal-sized ovaries and enlarged-ovarian tumors by propensity score matching analysis. METHODS: The medical records of EOC patients treated at Samsung Medical Center between 2002 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. We investigated EOC patients with high grade serous type histology and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV who underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) and adjuvant chemotherapy to identify patients with normal-sized ovaries. Propensity score matching was performed to compare patients with normal-sized ovaries to patients with enlarged-ovarian tumors (ratio, 1:3) according to age, FIGO stage, initial cancer antigen (CA)-125 level, and residual disease status after PDS. RESULTS: Of the 419 EOC patients, 48 patients had normal-sized ovary. Patients with enlarged-ovarian tumor were younger (54.0±10.3 vs. 58.4±9.2 years, p=0.005) than those with normal-sized ovary, and there was a statistically significant difference in residual disease status between the 2 groups. In total cohort with a median follow-up period of 43 months (range, 3–164 months), inferior overall survival (OS) was shown in the normal-sized ovary group (median OS, 71.2 vs. 41.4 months; p=0.003). After propensity score matching, the group with normal-sized ovary showed inferior OS compared to the group with enlarged-ovarian tumor (median OS, 72.1 vs. 41.4 months; p=0.031). In multivariate analysis for OS, normal-sized ovary remained a significant factor. CONCLUSION: Normal-sized ovary was associated with poor OS compared with the common presentation of enlarged ovaries in EOC, independent of CA-125 level or residual disease.
Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ginecología , Análisis por Apareamiento , Registros Médicos , Análisis Multivariante , Obstetricia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Ovario , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance of pre-treatment complete blood cell count (CBC), including white blood cell (WBC) differential, in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients with primary debulking surgery (PDS) and to develop nomograms for platinum sensitivity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 757 patients with EOC whose primary treatment consisted of surgical debulking and chemotherapy at Samsung Medical Center from 2002 to 2012. We subsequently created nomograms for platinum sensitivity, 3-year PFS, and 5-year OS as prediction models for prognostic variables including age, stage, grade, cancer antigen 125 level, residual disease after PDS, and pre-treatment WBC differential counts. The models were then validated by 10-fold cross-validation (CV). RESULTS: In addition to stage and residual disease after PDS, which are known predictors, lymphocyte and monocyte count were found to be significant prognostic factors for platinum-sensitivity, platelet count for PFS, and neutrophil count for OS on multivariate analysis. The area under the curves of platinum sensitivity, 3-year PFS, and 5-year OS calculated by the 10-fold CV procedure were 0.7405, 0.8159, and 0.815, respectively. CONCLUSION: Prognostic factors including pre-treatment CBC were used to develop nomograms for platinum sensitivity, 3-year PFS, and 5-year OS of patients with EOC. These nomograms can be used to better estimate individual outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Células Sanguíneas , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Quimioterapia , Leucocitos , Linfocitos , Monocitos , Análisis Multivariante , Neutrófilos , Nomogramas , Neoplasias Ováricas , Recuento de Plaquetas , Platino (Metal) , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of laparoscopic cytoreduction in patients with localized recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) by comparing its outcomes to those of laparotomy. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis in 79 EOC patients who had a localized single recurrent site, as demonstrated by computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission tomography/CT scan; had no ascites; were disease-free for 12 or more months prior; and who had undergone secondary cytoreduction (laparoscopy in 31 patients, laparotomy in 48 patients) at Samsung Medical Center between 2002 and 2013. By reviewing the electronic medical records, we investigated the patients' baseline characteristics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between laparoscopy and laparotomy patients in terms of age, body mass index, cancer antigen 125 level, tumor type, initial stage, grade, recurrence site, type of procedures used in the secondary cytoreduction, adjuvant chemotherapy, and disease-free interval from the previous treatment. With regards to surgical outcomes, reduced operating time, shorter hospital stay, and less estimated blood loss were achieved in the laparoscopy group. Complete debulking was achieved in all cases in the laparoscopy group. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach is feasible without compromising morbidity and survival in selected groups of patients with recurrent EOC. The laparoscopic approach can be a possible treatment option for recurrent EOC.
Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Laparoscopía/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Ovario/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes in two groups of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with initial recurrence detection by cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) elevation or imaging, and underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS). METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records was performed on 99 recurrent EOC patients who underwent SCS at the Samsung Medical Center between January 2002 and December 2013. For follow-up after primary treatment, patients were routinely assessed by CA-125 levels every 3 months and computed tomography (CT) scan (or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) every 6 months for first 3 years, and by CA-125 every 6 months and CT scan (or MRI) every 12 months thereafter. RESULTS: The first recurrence was initially identified by either CA-125 elevation (n=41, 41.4%) or by imaging study (n=58, 58.6%). None of the patients showed the symptoms as initial sign of recurrence. There were higher percentages of extra-pelvic recurrence (87.8%) and multiple recurrences (78.0%) in the group diagnosed by CA-125 elevation. The proportion of no residual disease after SCS was comparably lower in the CA-125 group (22.0% vs. 72.4%). There were 19 cancer-associated deaths (19.2%) within a median follow-up period of 67 months. The group diagnosed by imaging had better overall survival from initial diagnosis (OS1), overall survival after SCS (OS2), progression-free survival after the initial treatment (PFS1) and progression-free survival after SCS compared to those of the CA-125 group (PFS2). CONCLUSION: EOC patients with recurrence initially detected by imaging study showed better survival outcomes than patients diagnosed by CA-125 elevation.
Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígeno Ca-125/sangre , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/sangre , Neoplasias Ováricas/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical characteristics of fetal hydrops and to find the antenatal ultrasound findings predictive of adverse perinatal outcome. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 42 women with fetal hydrops who delivered in a tertiary-referral center from 2005 to 2013. Fetal hydrops was defined as the presence of fluid collection in > or =2 body cavities: ascites, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, and skin edema. Predictor variables recorded included: maternal characteristics, gestational age at diagnosis, ultrasound findings, and identifiable causes. Primary outcome variables analyzed were fetal death and neonatal death. RESULTS: The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 29.3+/-5.4 weeks (range, 18 to 39 weeks). The most common identifiable causes were cardiac abnormality (10), followed by syndrome (4), aneuploidy (3), congenital infection (3), twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (3), non-cardiac anormaly (2), chorioangioma (2), inborn errors of metabolism (1), and immune hydrops by anti-E antibody isoimmunization (1). Thirteen cases had no definite identifiable causes. Three women elected termination of pregnancy. Fetal death occurred in 4 cases. Among the 35 live-born babies, only 16 survived (54.0% neonatal mortality rate). Fetal death and neonatal mortality rate was not significantly associated with Doppler velocimetry indices or location of fluid collection, but increasing numbers of fluid collection site was significantly associated with a higher risk of neonatal death. CONCLUSION: The incidence of fetal hydrops in our retrospective study was 24.4 per 10,000 deliveries and the perinatal mortality rate was 61.9% (26/42). The number of fluid collection sites was the significant antenatal risk factor to predict neonatal death.
Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Embarazo , Aneuploidia , Ascitis , Diagnóstico , Edema , Muerte Fetal , Transfusión Feto-Fetal , Edad Gestacional , Hemangioma , Hidropesía Fetal , Incidencia , Mortalidad Infantil , Errores Innatos del Metabolismo , Derrame Pericárdico , Mortalidad Perinatal , Derrame Pleural , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reología , Factores de Riesgo , Piel , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes in uterine cancer patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy and prognostic factors associated with survival after the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 29 uterine cancer patients who underwent surgical resection of pulmonary metastatic lesions at Samsung Medical Center between June 1995 and December 2011. RESULTS: Histopathology showed carcinoma in 17 patients (58.6%) and sarcoma in 12 patients (41.4%). Of the 29 patients, 17 (58.6%) had less than three pulmonary metastatic lesions. Eight (27.6%) had symptoms related to lung metastasis. The 5-year survival rate after pulmonary metastasectomy for the entire cohort was 48.2%. On univariate and multivariate analysis, the presence of pulmonary symptoms and more than three lesions of metastasis were associated with poor survival after pulmonary metastasectomy. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary metastasectomy for uterine cancer is an acceptable treatment in selected patients. Patients with more than three pulmonary metastatic lesions and pulmonary symptoms related to lung metastasis could expect to have worse prognosis after pulmonary metastasectomy.
Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Terapia Combinada , Histerectomía/métodos , Leiomiosarcoma/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Metastasectomía/métodos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias UterinasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prognostic role of revised version of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (2013) in epithelial ovarian cancer and compare with previous version staging classification METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated at Samsung Medical Center from 2002 to 2012. We reclassified the patients based on the revised FIGO staging classification. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-eight patients were enrolled (stage I, 22.8%; stage II, 10.4%; stage III, 56.2%; stage IV, 10.7%). Previous stage IC (98, 11.1%) was subdivided into IC1 (9, 1.0%), IC2 (57, 6.4%), and IC3 (32, 4.1%). In addition, previous stage IV (94, 1.7%) was categorized into IVA (37, 4.2%) and IVB (57, 6.5%) in new staging classification. Stage IIC (66, 7.5%) has been eliminated and integrated into IIA (36, 4.1%) and IIB (55, 6.2%) in revised classification. Revised FIGO stage IC3 had significant prognostic impact on PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.840; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.361 to 10.83; P=0.011) and revised FIGO stage IIIC appears to be an independent, significant poor prognostic factor for PFS (HR, 2.541; 95% CI, 1.242 to 5.200; P=0.011) but not in the case of previous version of FIGO stage IIIC (HR, 1.070; 95% CI, 0.502 to 2.281; P=0.860). However, any sub-stages of both previous and revised version in stage II and IV, there was no significant prognostic role. CONCLUSION: Revised FIGO stage has more progressed utility for informing prognosis than previous version, especially in stage I and III. For stage II and IV, further validation should be needed in large population based study in the future.