Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center [The]. 2014; 9 (1): 27-32
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-141937

RESUMEN

Whether coronary artery ectasia [CAE] is a unique clinical finding or results from other clinical entities is still unknown. We aimed to determine the CAE prevalence, investigate the relationship between CAE and patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, and assess the prognosis at follow-up in a sample of Iranian population. Totally, 10057 patients who underwent coronary angiography were divided into three categories: normal coronary arteries without co-existing coronary artery disease; CAE without co-existing coronary artery narrowing < 50%; and coronary artery stenosis with > 50% luminal narrowing [CAS]. The prevalence of CAE was 1.5%. Compared to the normal individuals, the CAE patients were older, were more frequently male, and had higher rates of myocardial infarction [MI]. The CAE patients had a lower frequency of diabetes and MI than the CAS group. The CAE patients were largely focused between 40 to 60 years of age. The right coronary and left anterior descending arteries were the most involved arteries, and ectasia was located more frequently in the proximal part of these arteries. Patients with ectasia in the three main vessels had higher rates of MI. After a mean follow-up of 54.23 +/- 18.41 months, chest pain and dyspnea on exertion remained the main complaint in more than 97% of the patients, leading to hospital admission in more than 14%. There was no relationship between the presence of ectasia and conventional risk factors. According to our study, pure CAE may be deemed a benign feature of atherosclerosis; however, it can lead to frequent hospital admissions because of the persistence of cardiovascular symptoms


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Dilatación Patológica , Factores de Riesgo , Angiografía Coronaria , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center [The]. 2012; 7 (2): 58-64
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-144336

RESUMEN

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis [ARAS] remains underdiagnosed due to its nonspecific demonstrations. We aimed to both estimate the frequency of ARAS in high-risk non-selected patients undergoing simultaneous coronary and renal catheterization and possibly identify a predictive model for ARAS using baseline clinical, laboratory, and coronary angiographic variables. The records of 866 patients aged >/= 21 years undergoing simultaneous coronary and renal angiography were retrieved for analysis from our computerized database. The degree of ARAS was estimated visually by experienced attending interventional cardiologists. Lesions with an estimated stenosis of >/= 50% were considered significant. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression models were used to identify the risk factors predicting the presence and extent of ARAS. Of a total of 866 consecutive patients undergoing renal angiography in conjunction with coronary angiography [mean age +/- SD: 63.06 +/- 10.32, ranging from 24 to 89 years], 454 [57%] were men. A total of 345 [39.8%] cases had significant ARAS, 77 [22.3%] of which were bilateral. Using significant ARAS as the dependent variable, six variables were identified as the independent predictors significantly associated with the presence of ARAS, namely age, female sex [male sex was found to be a protector], hypertension, history of renal failure, left anterior descending artery [LAD] stenosis > 50%, and left circumflex artery [LCX] stenosis > 50%. The Gensini score was not found to be a predictor of the presence of ARAS, but it was more likely associated with a trend towards a more extensive ARAS [adjusted OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 1.00-1.01; p value = 0.039]. Other independent determinants of the ARAS extent were the same as the predictors of the ARAS presence. Although risk versus benefit was not tested in this study, it seems that clinicians could consider renal catheterization in combination with coronary angiography particularly in female patients with advanced age and with significant coronary artery stenoses in the LAD and LCX


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Cateterismo , Angiografía Coronaria , Insuficiencia Renal , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo
3.
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center [The]. 2012; 7 (4): 164-169
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-153384

RESUMEN

Isolated right bundle branch block [RBBB] is a common finding in the general population. The atrioventricular node [AVN] artery contributes to the blood supply of the right bundle branch. Our hypothesis was that the anatomy of the AVN artery and the pattern of dominancy differ between subjects with and without RBBB. We retrospectively studied the coronary angiography of 92 patients with RBBB and 184 age- and gender-matched controls without RBBB. All the subjects had angiographically proven normal coronary arteries. The dominant circulation and precise origin of the AVN artery were determined in each subject. Obtained data were compared between the two study groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of dominancy [p value = 0.200]. Origination of the AVN artery from the right circulatory system was more common in both groups, but this pattern was more prevalent in the cases than in the controls [p value = 0.021]. There was a great variation of the AVN artery origin. In the total study population, the AVN artery was more commonly separated from a non crux origin than from the crux area. The prevalence of the non-crux origination of the AVN artery was significantly higher in the cases than in the controls [p value < 0.001]. While the origination of the AVN artery from the right circulatory system was more common in both groups, the prevalence of the right origin of the AVN artery was significantly higher in the cases than in the controls. We observed that the AVN artery most commonly originated from the dominant artery but not necessarily from the crux. The anatomy of the AVN artery but not the pattern of dominancy is somewhat different in subjects with RBBB compared with normal individuals

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA