Endovascular treatment of aortic lesions involving branch vessels with multi-layer bare stents / 中华外科杂志

Aortic lesions involving branch vessels have always been a great challenge for vascular surgeons. Endovascular repair are growing to take place of traditional open repair for less invasion and lower complication rates. Despite rapid developments in endovascular instruments have been achieved in the last decade, and endovascular techniques such as fenestration stents have been applied in the treatment of aortic lesions involving branch vessels. However, endovascular repairing aortic lesions involving branch vessels remains being restricted by rigorous indication selection as well as requirements of advanced experiences and sophisticated skills. Recently, several studies about treating aortic lesion involving branch vessels with multi-layer bare stents have been reported, the primary results were encouraging and brought new visions for the management of such disease. More approving clinical evidences about the safety and efficacy of multi-layer stents are anticipated.

Outcomes of endovascular repairing aortic arch disease hybrid with supra-arch debranching procedures / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To summarize the experience of endovascular repairing aortic arch disease hybrid with supra-arch debranching procedures.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>It was a retrospective study. From January 2002 to December 2014, 42 high risk patients with aortic arch disease were treated by supra-arch debranching hybrid with subsequent endovascular repair in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. There were 39 male and 3 female patients with a mean age of (53±13) years (ranging from 34 to 80 years). Of the 42 patients, 7 were thoracic aortic aneurysm, 20 were Stanford type B aortic dissection and 15 were Stanford type A aortic dissection. After the supra-aortic debranching technique, simultaneous (n=16) or staged (n=26, mean interval (7±3) days) endovascular repair were performed. Fisher exact test was used to compare the in-hospital mortality of ascending aorta based debranching and non-ascending aorta based debranching.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Technical success rate was 81.0% (34/42). The overall 30-day complication rate was 31.0% (13/42), including 3 cerebral stroke (7.1%), 8 endoleak (19.0%, including 6 type I endoleak and 2 type II endoleak), 1 circulatory failure, 1 aorto-tracheal fistula. The 30-day mortality was 9.5% (4/42), 2 died of cerebral stroke, 1 died of circulatory failure, 1 died of aorto-tracheal fistula. The in-hospital mortality of ascending aorta based debranching group was obviously higher than that of the non-ascending aorta based debranching group (4/16 vs. 0, P=0.02). The median time of follow-up was 64.8 (2 to 156.9) months. CT scanning was performed at 1, 3 months after surgery and annually thereafter. The overall survival rate was 76.6%. During the follow-up period, there was 4 deaths, and 2 of them were aortic artery related (5.3%). There were 4 de novo complications during the follow-up period, 1 stroke attributed to bypass occlusion was cured by medical treatment, 2 pseudoaneurysm was successfully treated with open surgery, 1 stent-graft induced new distal entry tear was successfully treated with a tapered stent-graft, there was no new endoleak during follow up period, 3 type I endoleak disappeared spontaneously, and 1 type II endoleak disappeared after secondary intervention.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease hybrid with supra-arch debranching procedure is low invasive with favorable long-term outcomes. It is suitable for high risk patients of poor general condition with little tolerance to aortic arch replacement. The in-hospital mortality is higher in the ascending aorta based debranching group than in the non-ascending aorta based debranching group. Stroke is a critical fatal complication and should be attached attention.</p>