RESUMEN
【Objective】 To evaluate the effectiveness of rapid initial screening using HBsAg and syphilis reagents of immunochromatography technology before blood donation, and explore the influencing factors. 【Methods】 The pre-donation screening of HBsAg and anti-TP and post-donation blood test results of blood donors in Yangzhou region from January 2020 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The HBsAg and anti-TP reactive samples by ELISA from January to June 2023 were, retested using colloidal gold immunochromatographic reagents, and the results were compared and analyzed. 【Results】 A total of 200 414 blood donors were screened, among which 781 were HBsAg and anti-TP positive, accounting for 0.39%. A total of 191 717 blood donors successfully donated blood, and 986 were HBsAg and anti-TP positive by ELISA, accounting for 0.51%. 62 HBsAg and 61 anti-TP reactive samples were retested using the initial screening reagent, with 24 HBsAg reactive samples and 26 anti-TP reactive samples, accounting for 38.71% and 42.62% respectively. 14 HBsAg and 6 anti-TP gray area samples were retested, but no reactivity was found.The reactivity rates of 9 samples with HBsAg detection S/CO values greater than 25.0 and 10 samples with anti-TP detection S/CO values greater than 15.0 were all 100%.There was a negative correlation between the reaction intensity (S/CO value) of reactive samples and interpretation time of initial screening reaction. 【Conclusion】 The rapid primary screening of hepatitis B and syphilis with immunochromatography technology among blood donors can effectively improve the quality of blood and the qualification rate of blood after collection. Through targeted training of primary screening staff, the quality of primary screening can be further improved, the rate of missed detection can be reduced, and costs can be saved, thus reducing the risk of transfusion transmitted infection and ensuring the health of blood donors.
RESUMEN
【Objective】 To investigate the immune status of blood donors in Yangzhou area after SARS-COV-2 vaccinating. 【Methods】 Among 112 voluntary blood donors from August 29 to September 22, 2021, 111 were vaccinated with SARS-COV-2 vaccine.IgM antibody(by enzyme-linked immunocapture method), IgG antibody(by indirect method of combined immunoassay)and IgG antibody titer were detected. 【Results】 A total of 99.11% (111/112 ) voluntary blood donors were vaccinated, two-shot(n=103), one-shot(n=1) and three-shot (n=7) accounting for 91.96%, 0.89% and 6.25%, respectively.Eighty-eight (78.57%) were positive for IgG antibodies, and 14 (12.5%) were positive for IgM antibodies.No statistically significant difference was found in IgG and IgM positive yielding between males and females (P>0.05). The proportion (0.89%, 1/112) of positive IgM in blood donors with blood type A was significantly lower than that of other blood types (P<0.01). The IgG antibody titer of blood donors maintained rather high level within 6 months after vaccinating.47.66% of the donors presented antibody titer more than 160, and 5.60% had IgM antibody been detected within 1 month after vaccinating. 【Conclusion】 At present, the SARS-COV-2 vaccination effect in China is generally good.Since IgG antibodies cannot be detected after 6 months, it is suggested to perform IgG antibody testing for donors who have completed the second dose for more than 6 months.For those IgG antibody negative, booster shots should be conducted.For donors with high IgG antibody titer, their plasma may be considered to replace with COVID-19 convalescent plasma for the treatment of patients with rapid disease progression, or severe/critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19, so as to avoid the risk of COVID-19 re-spreading during convalescent plasma collection in blood centers. For blood donors with positive IgM antibodies, it is recommended to follow up the NAT results to minimize the risk of transmission.
RESUMEN
Objective To study the effect of antimitochndrial antibody(AMA) and antinuclear antibodies(ANA) on anti-human immunodeftcfency vius(HIV) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA).Methods By differents the result of weatern blot(WB),the tests were divided into two groups:experiment and control groups.The experiment group was divided into 2 sub group(A,B).Results There was signiftcant difference between experiment group A and control groups(P