RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the effect of regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO 2) combined with neurophysiological blood pressure monitoring on brain protection and myocardial protection during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with carotid stenosis and coronary heart disease. Methods:One hundred patients with carotid artery stenosis complicated with coronary heart disease treated in Jinhua Central Hospital from June 2021 to June 2022 were randomly divided into control group and experimental group. All patients were scheduled to undergo CEA. Fifty patients in the control group were administered with empirically increasing basic blood pressure by 20% - 30%, and 50 patients in the experimental group were administered with blood pressure under the guidance of rSO 2 combined with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (EPS). The neurological function indexes of the two groups [neuron specific enolase (NSE), central nerve specific protein (S100-β)], myocardial function indicators [cardiac troponin I (cTnI), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)], clinical indicators (eye opening time, extubation time, recovery room stay time, hospital stay) and the incidence of postoperative complications [delirium (POD), cognitive dysfunction (POCD), neurological impairment] were compard between the two groups. Results:Two sets of postoperative NSE and S100-β both increased ( P<0.05), but NSE and S100 in the experimental group after surgery were lower than those in the control group: (0.82 ± 0.14) μg/L vs. (1.18 ± 0.28) μg/L, (290.13 ± 27.25) mg/L vs. (301.98 ± 28.56) mg/L, the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). After surgery, cTnI and BNP increased in both groups ( P<0.05), but the cTnI and BNP in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group: (2.87 ± 0.74)] μg/L vs. (3.36 ± 0.83) μg/L, (3.01 ± 0.85) μg/L vs. (3.89 ± 0.92) μg/L, the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The opening time, extubation time, recovery room stay time, and hospitalization time in the experimental group were shorter than those in the control group: (16.79 ± 3.15) min vs. (20.55 ± 3.83) min, (29.38 ± 4.66) min vs. (40.14 ± 4.57) min, (66.82 ± 15.80) min vs. (89.35 ± 24.78) min, (11.24 ± 4.89) d vs. (14.56 ± 6.74) d, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group: 12.00% (6/50) vs. 28.00% (14/50), there was statistical difference ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The application of rSO 2 combined with neurophysiological blood pressure monitoring in CEA of patients with carotid artery stenosis and coronary heart disease has a good effect, which has brain protection and myocardial protection, can shorten the recovery time of anesthesia and hospitalization time, and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of carotid endarterectomy (CEA)and carotid artery stenting(CAS)for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in the elderly.Methods Clinical data of 116 elderly patients aged over 65 years with carotid artery stenosis were retrospectively analyzed.Of 116 patients,73 patients underwent CAS(the CAS group) and 32 received CEA(the CEA group).The success rate,30-day perioperative complications and follow-up results were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the success rate (96.8％ vs.100.0％,P ＞ 0.05),30-day perioperative complications,such as bradycardia (6.25％ vs.4.5％,x2 =0.228,P=0.663),acute myocardial infarction(0.0 vs.1.4％,x2 =0.432,P=0.511),transient hypotension(6.3％ vs.8.1％,x2 =0.114,P =0.735),ischemic stroke(6.3％ vs.6.8％,x2 =0.009,P =0.923),and cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (18.8 ％ vs.10.8％,x2 =0.009,P =0.923),between the CEA and CAS groups.The incidence of persistent hypotension was lower in the CEA group than in the CAS group(3.1％ vs.17.6％,x2 =4.398,P=0.036).No significant difference was found in carotid artery restenosis(moderate:6.3％ vs.8.1％,x2 =0.114,P =0.735;severe:3.1 ％ vs.2.7％,x2=0.014,P=0.905)and ipsilateral stroke(3.1％ vs.5.4％,x2 =0.279,P=0.598)between the CEA and CAS groups at one-year fellow-up.Conclusions Both CEA and CAS have good effieacies in treating carotid artery stenosis in the elderly,while the incidence of persistent hypotension is higher with CAS than with CEA.
RESUMEN
Objective To observe the effects of carotid artery stenting (CAS) on ophthalmic artery blood flow in patients with ischemic ophthalmopathy (IOP).Methods A prospective case-control study.Sixty IOP patients (60 eyes) who met inclusive criteria for CAS were enrolled in this study.There was 50％ stenosis of internal carotid artery on one side at least confirmed by color doppler flow imaging (CDFI).Among 60 eyes,there were 3 eyes with central retinal artery occlusion,15 eyes with retinal vein occlusion,37 eyes with ischemic optic neuropathy,5 eyes with ocular ischemia syndrome.The patients were randomly divided into CAS group (32 eyes of 32 patients) and medicine therapy group (28 eyes of 28 patients).The difference of age (t=1.804) and sex (x2=1.975) between two groups was not significant (P＞0.05).The examinations of fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA),CDFI and digital substraction angiography (DSA) were performed before,1 week and 6 months after treatment.The following parameters were recorded:arm-retinal circulation time (A-Rct),peak systolic velocity (PSV),end-diastolic velocity (EDV),and resistance index (RI) in the ophthalmic artery (OA) and central retinal artery (CRA),and the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).Results There was no significant differences in A-Rct (t=1.354) and BCVA (t=0.376) between the two groups before treatment (P＞0.05).Also,there was no significant differences in PSV (t=-0.294,-2.446),EDV (t=0.141,-0.305),and RI (t=-0.222,-0.694) of OA and CRA between the two groups before treatment before treatment (P＞0.05).Compared with the medicine therapy group,the lower A-Rct was found in the CAS group at different time points after the treatment.The difference was significant on 1 week after treatment (t=-3.205,P＜0.05),but not on 6 months after treatment (t=1.345,P＞0.05).The BCVA of eyes in the two groups were increasing with the extending of time of therapy.Compared with the medicine therapy group,the better BCVA was found in the CAS group at different time points after the treatment (t=0.800,1.527;P＜0.05).Compared with the medicine therapy group,the higher PSV,EDV and lower RI of OA and CRA were found in the CAS group at different time points after the treatment.(P＜0.05).Conclusion Compared with conventional medicine therapy,CAS shows earlier effects in improving ocular hemodynamics for IOP patients with carotid artery stenosis,which benefits visual function improvement of the patients.