Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1770-1773, 2015.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-480173

RESUMEN

Objective To translate the English version of the Oncology Patients' Perceptions of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale (OPPQNCS) into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of OPPQNCS in oncology patients.Methods The English version of OPPQNCS was translated by Brislin translation mode.Totally 320 oncology patients were recruited and were investigated by the Chinese version of OPPQNCS.Results The internal consistency coefficient of the Chinese version of OPPQNCS was more than 0.70,ranged from 0.804 to 0.964;the test-retest was 0.826.The content validity index(CVI) was 0.845-1.000,the average CVI was 0.925.Factor analysis got four factors,which explained 78.548% of the total variance.And every objective factor loading were greater than 0.4.Conclusions The Chinese version of OPPQNCS has been proved to be reliable and valid.It can be used as a valid tool for the oncology patients to measure their perceptions of the quality of nursing care they got.

2.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1502-1505, 2015.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-480172

RESUMEN

Objective To translate the English version of the Medication Adherence Self-efficacy Scale (MASES) into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of MASES in patients with hypertension.Methods Totally 285 patients with hypertension were recruited and were investigated by the Chinese version of MASES.The results underwent analysis for reliability and validity.Results The retest reliability of MASES was 0.843.The Cronbach α of the Chinese version of MASES was 0.876.The Cronbach α of the four dimensions ranged from 0.794 to 0.905.The average content vality index (CVI) of the scale was 0.946.Factor analysis got four factors,which explained 68.683% of the total variance.The factor loading of each item on its common factor was >0.4.Conclusions The Chinese version of MASES has been proved to be reliable and valid.It can be used as a valid tool for the measurement of the patient compliance in patients with hypertension.

3.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1460-1463, 2015.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-478492

RESUMEN

Objective To translate the English version of the Client-Centred Care Questionnaire (CCCQ) into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CCCQ.Methods The English version of CCCQ was translated into Chinese by the method of double translation-translation.Totally 320 chronic patients were recruited and they were investigated by the Chinese version of CCCQ.Results The Cronbach coefficient of the Chinese version of CCCQ was 0.925,P<0.01.The retest reliability was 0.807,P<0.01.The split-half reliability with r=0.883,P<0.01.The content validity index (CVI) was 0.956,and every purpose CVI values were above 0.8.Factor analysis got one factor,which explained 52.549% of the total variance,and each objective factor loading was above 0.4.Conclusions The Chinese version of CCCQ has been proved to be reliable and valid.It can be used as a valid tool for the chronic patients to measure their perceptions of the quality of nursing care.

4.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1674-1677, 2015.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-477381

RESUMEN

Objective To translate the English version of Diabetes Continuity of Care Scale (DCCS) into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DCCS in diabetes mellitus patients.Methods Totally 245 patients with diabetes mellitus were recruited and were investigated by the Chinese version of DCCS.Results The internal consistency coefficient of the Chinese version of DCCS ranged from 0.728 to 0.942,which was >0.70;split half coefficient r=0.784,and the test-retest was 0.864 while which of each dimension ranged from 0.785 to 0.886.The content validity index was 0.934.Factor analysis got five factors,which explained 76.574% of the total variance;the factor loading of each item was >0.4.Conclusions The Chinese version of DCCS has been proved to be reliable and valid.It can be used as a valid tool for the measurement of continuity of care in patients with diabetes mellitus.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA