Abordaje asterional mínimamente invasivo para descompresión microvascular en neuralgia del trigémino / Minimally invasive asterional approach for microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia

Resumen Objetivo: La neuralgia del trigémino (NT) es un trastorno neuropático susceptible de tratamiento quirúrgico. El objetivo es presentar los hallazgos quirúrgicos y resultados obtenidos en 26 pacientes con NT, tratados mediante un abordaje asterional mínimamente invasivo para descompresión vascular trigeminal. Métodos: Estudio longitudinal descriptivo. Se intervino mediante abordaje asterional a 26 pacientes. Se registró el historial médico, hallazgos quirúrgicos, respuesta al tratamiento y complicaciones. Se les dio seguimiento durante 36 meses. Resultados: Diecinueve casos se asociaron a compresión vascular, cinco casos a aracnoiditis y los dos restantes se relacionaron con esclerosis múltiple y neuralgia postherpética. El dolor se controló significativamente en todos los pacientes durante el postoperatorio inmediato. A 36 meses de seguimiento, en 25 pacientes se alcanzó un control total o aceptable del dolor. A largo plazo 22 pacientes evolucionaron sin complicaciones permanentes. Conclusiones: La cirugía de descompresión microvascular a través de un abordaje asterional mínimamente invasivo para el tratamiento de la NT es una alternativa con resultados similares al abordaje retrosigmoideo clásico, pero que suma las bondades de una técnica quirúrgica que se rige con los principios de la mínima invasión. Se requieren esfuerzos constantes para optimizar las técnicas quirúrgicas en el tratamiento de la NT.

Abstract Objective: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a neuropathic disorder that can be treated surgically. This study aimed to present the surgical findings and the clinical outcomes of 26 patients with TN treated by minimally invasive asterional surgery. Methods: Longitudinal descriptive study. Twenty-six patients with TN underwent minimally invasive asterional surgery. The medical history, surgical findings, therapeutic response, and complications were registered. They were followed for 36 months. Results: Nineteen cases were associated with vascular compression; five were associated with arachnoiditis. The two remaining cases were associated with multiple sclerosis and post-herpetic neuralgia. The pain was substantially reduced in all patients in the immediate postoperative period. At 36 months, in 25 patients, total or acceptable pain control was achieved. In the long term, 22 patients evolved with no permanent complications. Conclusion: The microvascular decompression surgery by an asterional approach is an alternative with similar results to the classic retrosigmoid approach to treat TN, but that adds the benefits of the principles of minimally invasive surgery. Constant efforts need to be made to optimize minimally invasive surgical techniques for TN.

Ensayos clínicos sin significado estadístico: la importancia del error tipo II / Clinical trials without statistical significance: importance of type II error

A randomized clinical trial is a prospective experiment to compare one or more interventions against a control group, in order to determine the effectiveness of the interventions. A clinical trial may compare the value of a drug vs. placebo. It may compare surgical with medical interventions. The principles apply to any situation in which the issue of who is exposed to which condition is under the control of the experimenter, and that the method of assignment is through randomization. A negative clinical trial is that in which no significant difference is found between the comparison groups. Results without statistical difference may be useful either to discard useless treatments or to demonstrate that one intervention is as effective as the one it was compared with. Eliminating useless treatments may be adequate. However, if this is the result of studies with methodological errors, new interventions that are actually useful may not be available for patients. In this review we present some of the possible methodological errors that may lead to false negative results in clinical trials.