RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of pancreaticoduodenectomy with TRIANGLE operation in the treatment of pancreatic head cancer.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 51 patients with pancreatic head cancer who were admitted to the Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China from January 2017 to July 2018 were collected. There were 33 males and 18 females, aged from 42 to 74 years, with a median age of 56 years. Of the 51 patients, 24 cases undergoing standard pancreaticoduodenectomy, in which No.12, 13 and 17 lymph nodes were dissected, combined with transcatheter arterial infusion chemo-therapy (TAI) were allocated into the standard group, and 27 cases undergoing pancreaticoduo-denectomy with TRIANGLE operation, in which No.7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17 lymph nodes were dissected, combined with TAI were allocated into the TRIANGLE group, respectively. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative conditions of the two groups; (2) postoperative conditions of the two groups; (3) follow-up and survival. Follow-up was conducted using outpatient examination and telephone interview once three months to detect tumor recurrence and metastasis and survival of patients up to July 2021 or the death of patient. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range), and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data was analyzed using the rank sum test. Kaplan‐Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate and median survival time and draw survival curve. Log‐Rank test was used for survival analysis. Results:(1) Comparison of intraoperative conditions between the two groups. The operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, cases with intraoperative blood transfusion were (501±61)minutes, (563±278)mL, 4 in the standard group, versus (556±46)minutes, (489±234)mL, 6 in the TRIANGLE group, respectively. There was a significant difference in the operation time between the two groups ( t=3.62, P<0.05) but there was no significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss or cases with intraoperative blood transfusion between the two groups ( t=1.03, χ2=0.25, P>0.05). (2) Comparison of postoperative conditions between the two groups. Of the 51 patients, 30 had 50 times of postoperative complications, including 18 times of grade Ⅰ complications of Clavien-Dindo classification, 29 times of grade Ⅱ complications of Clavien-Dindo classification, 2 times of grade Ⅲa complications of Clavien-Dindo classification, 1 time of grade Ⅲb complications of Clavien-Dindo classification, respectively. Cases with postoperative complications, cases with delayed gastric emptying, cases without or with pancreatic fistula as class A or class B, cases with biliary fistula, cases with bleeding, cases with diarrhea were 15, 4, 13, 7, 4, 4, 2, 2 in the standard group, versus 15, 6, 14, 10, 3, 4, 1, 3 in the TRIANGLE group, respectively. There was no significant difference in cases with postoperative complications, cases with delayed gastric emptying, cases with pancreatic fistula between the two groups ( χ2=0.16, 0.02, Z=-0.04, P>0.05) and there was no significant difference in cases with biliary fistula, cases with bleeding, cases with diarrhea between the two groups ( P>0.05). Cases with complications as Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ, grade Ⅱ, grade Ⅲ were 10, 11, 2 in the standard group, versus 8, 18, 1 in the TRIANGLE group, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( Z=-0.67, P>0.05). The duration of postoperative hospital stay was (23±8)days in both of the standard group and the TRIANGLE group, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( t=0.31, P>0.05). (3) Follow-up and survival. All the 51 patients were followed-up for 6 to 54 months, with a median follow-up time of 17 months. The postoperative 1-year overall survival rate was 75.0% and 81.5% in the standard group and the TRIANGLE group, respectively. The postoperative 3-year overall survival rate was 12.5% and 22.2% in the standard group and the TRIANGLE group, respectively. The median postoperative survival time was 15.00 months (95% confidence interval as 12.63 to 17.37 months) and 21.00 months (95% confidence interval as 15.91 to 19.62 months) in the standard group and the TRIANGLE group, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival of patients between the two groups ( χ2=4.30, P<0.05). Cases with tumor recurrence during post-operative 1 year and 3 year were 9 and 20 in the standard group, versus 6 and 15 in the TRIANGLE group, respectively. There was no significant difference in cases with tumor recurrence during postoperative 1 year between the two groups ( P>0.05) and there was a significant difference in cases with tumor recurrence during postoperative 3 year between the two groups ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with standard pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy with TRIANGLE operation can prolong the median survival time of patients with pancreatic head cancer without increasing surgical related complications.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of different treatment methods for chronic pancreatitis based on M-ANNHEIM system.Methods:The retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 177 patients with chronic pancreatitis from two medical centers between July 2008 and July 2018 were collected, including 95 in the Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital and 82 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. There were 100 males and 77 females, aged (49±5)years, with a range from 29 to 72 years. The M-ANNHEIM system was used to decide clinical stages of chronic pancreatitis. Patients in different clinical stages received drug, endoscopic or surgical treatment. Observation indicators: (1) general data and follow-up of patients; (2) treatment of patients in asymptomatic stage; (3) treatment of patients in stage Ⅰ; (4)treatment of patients in stage Ⅱ; (5) treatment of patients in stage Ⅲ; (6) treatment of patients in stage Ⅳ; (7) aggravation and new-onset of diabetes; (8) complications. Follow-up using outpatient examination, telephone, mail, and Sojump was performed to collect data for M-ANNHEIM system up to December 2018. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed by the AVONA. Repeated measurement data were analyzed using repeated ANOVA. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test. Results:(1) General data and follow-up of patients: there were 11, 72, 55, 31, and 8 patients with chronic pancreatitis classified as asymptomatic stage, stage Ⅰ, stage Ⅱ, stage Ⅲ, stage Ⅳ of M-ANNHEIM system before treatment. Of the 177 patients, 49, 49, and 79 patients underwent drug, endoscopic and surgical treatment, respectively. All the 177 patients were followed up for (2.4±0.5)years. (2) Treatment of patients in asymptomatic stage: 11 patients in asymptomatic stage underwent drug treatment. The M-ANNHEIM score was 1.91±0.21 before treatment, and 1.27±0.14, 1.73±0.19, 2.09±0.16 at 1 month, 12 months, 24 months after treatment, respectively. (3) Treatment of patients in stage Ⅰ: of the 72 patients in stage Ⅰ, 13 underwent drug treatment, 26 underwent endoscopic treatment, and 33 underwent surgical treatment. The M-ANNHEIM score of patients undergoing drug treatment was 8.11±1.05 before treatment, and 6.31±0.31, 7.69±0.24, 10.00±0.23 at 1 month, 12 months, 24 months after treatment, respectively. The M-ANNHEIM score of patients undergoing endoscopic treatment was 8.42±0.93 before treatment, and 5.13±0.25, 6.89±0.20, 8.27±0.24 at 1 month, 12 months, 24 months after treatment, respectively. The M-ANNHEIM score of patients undergoing surgical treatment was 8.13±0.77 before treatment, and 4.79±0.15, 5.42±0.22, 7.76±0.20 at 1 month, 12 months, 24 months after treatment, respectively. There was no significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score before treatment between patients receiving different treatments ( F=1.23, P>0.05). For patients in M-ANNHEIM stage Ⅰ, at 1 month after treatment, there was a significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving endoscopic treatment, between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=2.94, 4.98, P<0.05); there was no significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving endoscopic treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=1.26, P>0.05). At 12 months after treatment, there was a significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving endoscopic treatment, between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment, between patients receiving endoscopic treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=2.43, 5.99, 4.80, P<0.05). At 24 months after treatment, there was a significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving endoscopic treatment, between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=4.61, 6.29, P<0.05); there was no significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving endoscopic treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=1.63, P>0.05). (4) Treatment of patients in stage Ⅱ: of the 55 patients in stage Ⅱ, 8 underwent drug treatment, 15 underwent endoscopic treatment, and 32 underwent surgical treatment. The M-ANNHEIM score of patients undergoing drug treatment was 12.61±1.16 before treatment, and 11.63±0.26, 12.57±0.30, 14.50±0.27 at 1 month, 12 months, 24 months after treatment, respectively. The above indicators of patients undergoing endoscopic treatment was 12.42±1.43, 8.47±0.24, 11.07±0.21, 11.93±0.30, respectively. The above indicators of patients undergoing surgical treatment was 12.53±1.22, 8.78±0.15, 9.94±0.21, 11.00±0.24, respectively. There was no significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score before treatment between patients receiving different treatments ( F=1.38, P>0.05). For patients in M-ANNHEIM stage Ⅱ, at 1 month after treatment, there was a significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving endoscopic treatment, between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=8.37, 8.48, P<0.05); there was no significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving endoscopic treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=1.13, P>0.05). At 12 months after treatment, there was a significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving endoscopic treatment, between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment, between patients receiving endoscopic treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=4.13, 8.48, 3.33, P<0.05). At 24 months after treatment, there was a significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving endoscopic treatment, between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment, between patients receiving endoscopic treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=5.61, 6.83, 2.26, P<0.05). (5) Treatment of patients in stage Ⅲ: of the 31 patients in stage Ⅲ, 9 underwent drug treatment, 8 underwent endoscopic treatment, and 14 underwent surgical treatment. The M-ANNHEIM score of patients undergoing drug treatment was 17.25±0.89 before treatment, and 17.11±0.35, 18.44±0.41, 17.33±0.44 at 1 month, 12 months, 24 months after treatment, respectively. The above indicators of patients undergoing endoscopic treatment was 17.38±1.06, 15.00±0.53, 16.50±0.33, 16.88±0.44, respectively. The above indicators of patients undergoing surgical treatment was 17.63±1.06, 14.64±0.34, 16.00±0.35, 16.57±0.33, respectively. There was no significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score before treatment between patients receiving different treatments ( F=1.19, P>0.05). For patients in M-ANNHEIM stage Ⅲ, at 1 month after treatment, there was a significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving endoscopic treatment, between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=3.37, 4.82, P<0.05); there was no significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving endoscopic treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=0.59, P>0.05). At 12 months after treatment, there was a significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving endoscopic treatment, between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=3.63, 4.48, P<0.05); there was no significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving endoscopic treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=0.95, P>0.05). At 24 months after treatment, there was no significant difference in M-ANNHEIM score between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving endoscopic treatment, between patients receiving drug treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment, between patients receiving endoscopic treatment and patients receiving surgical treatment ( F=0.73, 1.41, 0.55, P>0.05). (6) Treatment of patients in stage Ⅳ: 8 patients in stage Ⅳ underwent drug treatment. The M-ANNHEIM score of patients was 17.94±0.59 before treatment, and 18.01±0.34, 17.54±0.19, 17.34±0.26, 17.88±0.43 at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months after treatment, respectively. (7) Aggravation and new-onset of diabetes: of 49 patients undergoing endoscopic treatment, 17 had diabetes before treatment, 5 had aggravated diabetes and 11 had new-onset of diabetes after treatment. Of 79 patients undergoing surgical treatment, 31 had diabetes before treatment, 21 had aggravated diabetes and 7 had new-onset of diabetes after treatment. There were significant differences in the aggravation and new-onset of diabetes between the two groups ( χ2=2.07, 2.04, P<0.05). (8) Complications: 49 patients undergoing drug treatment had no treatment related complications. Of 49 patients undergoing endoscopic treatment, 4 patients with stent related complications were cured after replacing stent under endoscopy, 6 patients had acute pancreatitis, 2 had gastrointestinal bleeding including 1 patient was cured after endoscopic hemostasis, other patients with complications were improved after symptomatic and supportive treatment. Of 79 patients undergoing surgical treatment, 17 had pancreatic leakage (including 11 of biochemical leakage, 5 of grade B pancreatic leakage, and 1 of grade C pancreatic leakage), 3 had postoperative gastroparesis, 3 had intraabdominal infection, 1 had deep venous thrombosis, 2 had hemorrhage of which 1 combined with grade C pancreatic leakage was improved after open hemostasis and 1 was improved after interventional treatment, other patients with complications were improved after symptomatic and supportive treatment. Conclusions:For chronic pancreatitis, individualized treatment should be formulated according to the different stages. M-ANNHEIM score system can be used the evaluate clinical efficacies of drug treatment, endoscopic treatment, and surgical treatment.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the influence of iloprost on the expression of lung endothelin-1(ET-1) in rats with hypoxic pulmonary hypertension(HPH).Methods Thirty-two male SD rats were randomly divided into four groups:normal control (NC) group,normal treatment(NT) group,hypoxia control(HC) group,hypoxia treatment (HT) group.NC group and NT group raised under normal Oxygen conditions 3 weeks.HC and HT group placed in a low Oxygen chamber (O2 10％) were treated 3 weeks of hypoxia 8 hours per day.NT and HT group were treated daily iloprost by inhalation therapy (2μg/kg).Affer three weeks,measured mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP),right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP),index of right ventricular hypertrophy.HE staining was used to observe the morphological changes of pulmonary arteries and image analysis system was used to calculate the percentage of vascular wall thickness of small pulmonary arteries in each group,RT-PCR technique was used to assess the trends of ET-1 in lung tissue homogenates.Results The hemodynamics in HC group was significantly higher than other groups(P＜0.05),there was no significant statistically difference of the hemodynamics in HT group compare with normal control group.Pulmonary arteries morphology,vessel wall thickening and vessel lumina stenosis in HC group than NC、NT、group.These indicators were significant improved in HT group.ET-1 expression in lung tissue were significantly increased in HC group than NC groups.No significant difference was found between and NC group HT group.Conclusion Aerosol inhalation of iloprost has exact therapeutic effect for rats with HPH.Iloprost reduced ET-1 overexpression in lung tissue in HPH rats and prevent pulmonary vascular remodeling.
RESUMEN
Objective To evaluate the effects of interferon therapy after curative surgical intervention on improving prognosis of patients with hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods We searched randomized clinical trials from 1990 to 2015 on interferon therapy after curative surgical intervention in patients with hepatitis C-related HCC from the Cochrane Library,the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,MEDLINE and Embase.A Meta-analysis was carried out using Revman 5.Results There were 7 studies included in this research.The results showed that interferon therapy after curative surgical intervention in patients with hepatitis C-related HCC reduced the recurrence rate of HCC at 3 years (RR =0.84,95％ CI 0.73 ～0.97,P ＜0.05).The therapy could not improve the 3-year survival rate in these patients (RR =1.04,95％ CI 0.90 ～ 1.21,P ＞ 0.05).Stratified subgroup analyses showed interferon therapy after liver resection reduced the recurrence rate (RR =0.62,95 ％ CI 0.39 ～ 1.00,P =0.05).For patients with tumors less than 3 cm,interferon therapy reduced the recurrence rate (RR =0.82,95％ CI 0.69 ～ 0.98,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Interferon therapy after curative surgical intervention improved prognosis in patients with hepatitis C-related HCC.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the significance of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γexpression in the lung tissue of rats with chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension (HPAH). Methods Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups (n=10 for each group):normal control group (NC), hypoxia control group-one-week (HC-1w), hypoxia control group-two-week (HC-2w) and hypoxia control group-three-week (HC-3w). Normal control group was raised under normal oxygen condition in ventilated animal cage for three weeks. The other HC groups were placed in a low oxygen chamber (O2 concentration of 10%) from 9:00 AM-5:00 PM (8 h/d) everyday by one week, two weeks and three weeks. The mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) were detected. The index of right ventricular hypertrophy RV/(LV+S) was measured by dissecting rat heart. The morphological changes of the small pul-monary arteries were observed by HE staining, and the percentage of vascular wall thickness (WT%) was calculated. The ex-pression level of PPARγprotein was detected by Westren blot assay. Results The mPAP, RVSP and RV/(LV+S) were sig-nificantly higher in HC groups than those of NC group (P<0.05). The morphology of pulmonary arteries showed vessel wall thickening and vessel lumina stenosis in HC groups compared with that of NC group. The PPARγexpression in lung tissue was significantly lower in HC groups than that of NC group, and the downward trend was more obvious with the extension of time. Conclusion PPARγplays an important role in the occurrence and development of chronic hypoxic pulmonary hyper-tension.
RESUMEN
Objective To explore the correlation of serum procalcitonin and prognosis of neonatal sepsis. Methods 113 cases of infection were selected as the objects of study,which were divided into the observation group ( sepsis) and control group ( non sepsis) according to the presence of sepsis.2mL venous blood was selected when patients were admitted to hospital before antibiotic treatment.The level of PCT was detected by immunoluminometric assay.PCT level at admission and after treatment were used to analyze the relationship between changes and the severity and prognosis of patients.Results PCT level of the observation group [(11.03 ±6.21)ng/mL] were higher than that of the control group [(0.81 ±1.61)ng/mL] (t=8.507,P<0.01),Sepsis and death in patients with serum PCT values increased significantly over time (F=5.061,P<0.05);invalid value of serum PCT in patients with disease exacerbation was significantly higher(F=4.793,P<0.05);improved serum PCT values in patients with the disease better reduced(F=6.009,P<0.05).While PCT<14.86ng/mL mortality rate (14.89%) was significantly lower than the PCT≥14.86ng/mL mortality rate (72.22%).Conclusion PCT shows important clinical efficacy in forcasting prognosis of neonatal sepsis.It is worthy of wider promotion and application.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the efficacies of extended and standard radical pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer in head of pancreas.Methods The clinical data of 96 patients with pancreatic cancer in head of pancreas who were admitted to the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from 2001 to 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.Forty-one patients who received extended RPD were in the extended group and 55 patients who received standard RPD were in the standard group.Blood loss,operation time,hospital stay,surgical complications,severity of complication,1-,3-,5-year survival rate,median survival time,time and location of tumor recurrence and 1-year quality of life of the patients in the 2 groups were compared.All data were analyzed by using rank sum test and analysis of variance.The survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and was analyzed by Log-rank test.Results There were no significant differences in the age,diameter and differentiation of the tumor,and number of metastatic lymph nodes between the 2 groups.The operation time,operative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay were 364 minutes (310-650 minutes),680 ml (0-1800 ml) and 13.5 days (10-76 days) in the extended group,which were significantly higher than 315 minutes (260-306 minutes),305 ml (0-1000 ml) and 9.2 days (7-30 days) in the standard group (F=7.15,4.22,3.82,P＜0.05).The incidences of complications in grade 1 and 2 were 5％ (2/41) and 20％ (8/41) in the extended group,which were significantly lower than 25％ ( 14/55 ) and 49％ (27/55) in the standard group ( x2 =5.76,8.87,P ＜ 0.05).The incidence of complications in grade 3a was 41％ ( 17/41 ) in the extended group,which was significantly higher than 7％ (4/55) in the standard group ( x2 =14.10,P ＜ 0.05 ).There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications in grade 3b and 4a between the 2 groups ( x2 =1.44,0.88,P ＞ 0.05 ).There were no significant difference in the 1-,3-,5-year survival rate,median survival time,postoperative quality of life and time of tumor recurrence between the 2 groups ( x2 =0,0.13,0; F =0.49,1.03,t =0.32,P ＞ 0.05 ).Conclusion Standard RPD is optimal for patients with ordinary pancreatic cancer in head of pancreas.Extended RPD could be applied for patients with enlargement of group 16 lymph nodes and could receive R0 resection.
RESUMEN
Objective To introduce the role of pancreatic stellate cells in pancreatic fibrosis and the progress in treatment of pancreatic fibrosis. Methods Relevant literatures were collected and reviewed. Results Pancreatic stellate cells activation was closely related to pancreatic fibrosis. Inhibition of pancreatic stellate cells activation could provide a new approach in clinical treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Conclusion Pancreatic stellate cells are the key to pancreatic fibrosis,which are becoming the target for anti-fibrosis of the pancreas and treatment of chronic pancreatitis.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE@#To explore the clinical feature, the reason of misdiagnosis and mistreatment, influential factor of prognosis in patients with extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma-nasal type.@*METHOD@#A retrospective study was made on the clinical data of 34 patients with extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma-nasal type. Among them, 10 cases were staged I(E) intra-cavity, 15 cases were I(E) ex-cavity, 6 cases were II(E) and 3 cases were IV(E). Among them, 29 cases were in nasal cavity, 5 cases were outside nasal cavity; 14 cases were treated with single chemotherapy or radiation therapy, 20 cases were treated with radiation therapy add chemotherapy.@*RESULT@#The total rate of misdiagnosis and mistreatment were 58.8% (20/34), 52.3% (18/34), respectively. The 5-year survival rate of the I(E) intra-cavity group were 60.0% (6/10), and those of I(E) ex-cavity group were 26.7% (4/15), and those of II(E) group and IV(E) group were 16.7% (1/6), 0% (0/3), respectively There was significant difference between 3 groups by statistical analysis (P < 0.01). The 5-year survival rate of I(E) ex-cavity group treated with single therapy were 0% (0/6), and those of I(E)-cavity group treated with combined therapy were 50% (1/2).@*CONCLUSION@#The early clinical manifestation of extranodal NK/T tell lymphoma-nasal type is atypical and which is hard to diagnose and treat. Diagnosis depends on pathologic biopsy and immunohistochemistry, there are many factors that influence the prognosis of this disease, in which the clinical stage is a major factor. It is crucial for diagnosing and treating early.