RESUMEN
Objective:To explore the risk stratification value of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease based on cluster analysis and to identify the high-risk population of cardiovascular adverse events in patients.Methods:Prospective consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent CCTA examination and were confirmed as non-obstructive coronary heart disease were enrolled in the General Hospital of Chinese PLA from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The clinical characteristics and CCTA diagnosis information of patients were collected, and then follow-up was performed to obtain adverse cardiovascular events. Firstly, the cluster analysis based on CCTA information divided the patients into different groups. Then, the risk of adverse cardiovascular events was compared between different groups. Finally, segment involvement score (SIS) score, Leiden score, SIS score combined with clinical characteristics, Leiden score combined with clinical characteristics, and cluster information combined with clinical characteristics were used to stratify the population, and the concordance index-time curve and net reclassification improvement (NRI) index were described to compare the risk stratification ability of the five different models.Results:A total of 3 402 patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease were included in the study, of whom 104 had adverse cardiovascular events during the follow-up period. Cluster analysis based on CCTA information classified patients into 3 different groups. There were statistically significant differences in clinical characteristics, CCTA information, and survival outcomes between groups ( P<0.05). The results of the concordance index-time curve showed that the risk stratification ability of CCTA cluster information combined with clinical characteristics was better than the current SIS score, Leiden score, SIS score combined with clinical characteristics, Leiden score combined with clinical characteristics. At the 1-year and 2-year time cutoffs, cluster information combined with clinical characteristics showed a positive increase in INR compared with the first four models (INR was 0.248 and 0.293, 0.316 and 0.293, 0.147 and 0.003, 0.192 and 0.007, respectively). Conclusion:CCTA based on cluster analysis has a good risk stratification value for patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease and is helpful for individualized intervention.
RESUMEN
Objective:To develop a pretest probability model of obstructive coronary artery disease with machine learning based on multi-site Chinese population data.Methods:Chinese regiStry in early deTection and Risk strAtificaTion of coronary plaques (C-Strat) study is a prospective multi-center cohort study, in which consecutive patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease and ≥64 detector row coronary computed tomography angioplasty (CCTA) evaluation were included. Data from the patients were randomly split into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%). More than 50% of coronary artery stenosis by CCTA was defined as positive outcome. A boosted ensemble algorithm (XGBoost), 10-fold cross-validation and Bayesian optimization were used to establish a new prediction model-CARDIACS(pretest probability model from Chinese registry in eARly Detection and rIsk stratificAtion of Coronary plaques Study), and a logistic regression was used to establish a model-LOGISTIC in training set. The test set was used for validation and comparison among CARDIACS, LOGISTIC, UDFM (updated Diamond-Forrester Model) and DFCASS(Diamond-Forrester and CASS).Results:The study population included 29 455 patients with age of (57.0±9.7) years and 44.8% women, of whom 19.1% (5 622/29 455) had obstructive coronary artery disease. For CARDIACS, the age, the reason for visit and the body mass index (BMI) were the most important predictive variables. In the independent test set, the area under the curve (AUC) of CARDIACS was 0.72 (95% CI 0.70-0.73), which was significantly superior to that of LOGISTIC (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.68-0.71, P=0.015), UDFM (AUC 0.64, 95% CI 0.62-0.65, P<0.001) and DFCASS (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.64-0.67, P<0.001), respectively. Conclusion:Based on Chinese population, the study developed a new pretest probability model--CARDIACS, which was superior to the traditional models. CARDIACS is expected to assist in the clinical decision-making for patients with stable chest pain.
RESUMEN
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the automated quantitative analysis by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for lesion specific hemodynamic significance assessed by fractional flow reserve(FFR). Methods One hundred and fifteen patients with one hundred and fifty?one vessels,who successively underwent invasive coronary angiography with evaluation of FFR(values≤0.8 were defined as lesion specific hemodynamically significant), were analyzed by coronary CT angiography. FFR≤0.80 was found in 54(35.76％) of the 151 vessels, which was divided into two groups (group of hemodynamically significant and group of hemodynamically non-significant). CCTA images were quantitatively analyzed with automated software to obtain the following index:minimal lumen diameter(MLD), maximum diameter stenosis(MDS％), minimal lumen area(MLA), maximum area stenosis(MAS％), lesion length (LL), total plaque volume(TPV), total plaque burden(TPB), calcified plaque volume(CPV), calcified plaque burden (CPB), non-calcified plaque volume(NCPV), non-calcified plaque burden(NCPB), lipid plaque volume(LPV), lipid plaque burden(LPB), fibrous plaque volume(FPV), fibrous plaque burden(FPB), napkin-ring sign(NRS), remodeling index(RI) and eccentric index(EI). Logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics were used for statistical analysis. Results MDS％(65.04％± 8.20％), MAS％(73.91％± 7.58％), TPB(57.96％± 11.17％), CPB[4.32％(0.11％, 5.34％)], LPB[14.89％(9.30％, 19.23％)], CPV[30.68 (0.29, 33.36)mm3], LPV[(81.72(33.92, 94.68)mm3]in the group with hemodynamic significance were larger than those in group with normal hemodynamic status[58.27％± 9.50％, 64.83％± 8.31％, 53.88％± 11.77％, 2.05％(0.00％, 3.42％), 11.83％(6.34％, 16.8％), 12.53(0.00, 13.24)mm3, 60.71(24.1, 75.11)mm3, respectively], which was statistically significant(t=4.41,P<0.01;Z=6.63,P<0.01;t=2.08,P<0.05;Z=-2.47,P<0.01;Z=-2.30,P<0.05;Z=-2.48, P<0.01;Z=-2.55, P<0.01, respectively). MLD[1.24(1.04, 1.46)mm]and MLA[3.61(2.40, 4.80) mm2]in the group with hemodynamic significance were smaller than those in group with normal hemodynamic status[1.53(1.32,1.72)mm, 5.28(4.00,6.40)mm2],which was statistically significant[Z=-4.82,-5.40, respectively;P<0.01].In logistic regression analysis, only MAS％(OR:1.08,95％CI:1.01-1.15,P=0.02), CPB (OR:1.16,95％CI:1.02-1.33,P=0.02) and LPB(OR:1.10,95％CI:1.01-1.19,P=0.02), MLA(OR:0.69, 95％CI:0.49-0.98,P=0.04)were significant predictors of hemodynamic significance. For predicting lesion specific hemodynamic significance, compared with MLA(0.76), MDS％(0.71), CPB(0.62) and LPB(0.61), except for MLA(Z=0.77, P=0.44), the AUC of MAS％(0.79) was significantly increased(Z=2.54, P=0.01;Z=2.91, P<0.01;Z=2.94, P<0.01, respectively). However, combination of other index to MAS％[MAS％+MLA％(0.81), MAS％+MDS％(0.80), MAS％+TPB(0.80), MAS％+CPB(0.80), MAS％+LPB(0.81)] did not show significantly difference over MAS％(Z=1.10, 0.71, 0.40, 0.54, 1.07, respectively;P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with diameter stenosis, area stenosis substantially improves the prediction of lesion specific hemodynamic significance.
RESUMEN
Objective@#To characterize the hemodynamic force towards coronary plaque based on noninvasive coronary computed tomographic angiography and to investigate its relationship with plaque features and stenosis severity by computational fluid dynamics.@*Methods@#Twenty-six patients underwent invasive fractional flow reserve measurement following coronary computed tomography angiography examination from March to September 2016 were retrospectively included. Computational fluid dynamics was applied and wall shear stress (WSS) and axial plaque stress (APS), which extracted the axial component of hemodynamic stress acting on stenotic lesions, were calculated based on the results of noninvasive coronary computed tomographic angiography. Plaque analysis was performed to elucidate plaque features and relative plaque burden. The fluid dynamics distributions in lesions with different stenosis severity were investigated.@*Results@#Thirty-one coronary plaques with satisfactory imaging quality were analyzed, there were 11 (35.5%) dominant low WSS (<1 Pa) lesion and 20 high WSS lesion (64.5%), 8(25.8%) net retrograde APS lesion and 23(74.2%) anterograde lesion. Plaque volume was (78.5±48.6) mm3 and plaque burden was (69.1±12.1)% in the low WSS group, which was(60.5±57.3) mm3, and(57.5±14.0)%, respectively in the high WSS group, the plaque burden was significantly higher in the low WSS group than in the high WSS group (P=0.028), while the percentage of calcified plaque, fibrotic plaque and lipid core volume were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). Plaque volume was (79.7±69.1) mm3 and plaque burden was(68.7±13.7)% in the group with anterograde-dominant APS plaque, which was(61.7±24.9)mm3, and(68.9±10.4)%, respectively in the net retrograde APS lesion group (P>0.05). Percentage of lipid core area was significantly higher in the anterograde lesion group than in the retrograde lesion group ((25.1±18.1)% vs.(10.8±12.7)%, P=0.049). Both WSS and APS were significant higher in the severe obstructive coronary stenosis group than in non-severe obstructive coronary stenosis group (P<0.05). Although there was no difference in WSS between functional coronary ischemia group and non-functional coronary ischemia group ( (13.3±8.7) Pa vs. (12.5±14.2) Pa, P>0.05), the distribution of APS was different between the functional coronary ischemia group and non-functional coronary ischemia group ((1 698.8±652.6) Pa vs. (981.4±787.5) Pa, P<0.05).@*Conclusion@#WSS and APS can uniquely characterize the stenotic segment and has a strong relationship with lesion geometry. APS may be related to the necrotic core plaque and functional coronary ischemia. Clinical application of these hemodynamic and geometric indices may be helpful to assess the future risk of plaque progress and plaque rupture, which will be helpful on determining respective treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease.