Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Al-Azhar Medical Journal. 2005; 34 (4): 579-586
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-69465

RESUMEN

Hemorrhoidectomy is eligible for day case surgery, but the presences of postoperative pain and! or urinary retention interfere with this concept. This study aimed to use local anesthesia with posterior perineal block [PPB] technique to perform hemorrhoidectomy with comfort and to decrease the postoperative pain and urinary retention allowing early patient discharge. Sixty patients with 3rd or 4th degree hemorrhoids were randomized into two groups. The first group; 20 patients [15 men and 5 women, mean age 40.7 +/- 9.27] received general anesthesia [control group]. The second group; 40 patients [31 men and 9 women, mean age 42.4. +/- 8.83] received PPB with 50 ml ropivacaine 0.5%. Milligan - Morgan hemorrhoidectomy was then undertaken for all patients. There were no local or systemic toxicity for ropivacaine. In the PPB group, the intraoperative analgesia was adequate in 87.5% patients. The postoperative pain was assessed at 30 minute, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours using visual analog scale WAS]. At all time pain was less in the patients who had received PPB. The rate of urinary retention was 5% [2 patients] in PPB group while it reaches 25% [5 patients] in the control group. Thirty eight patients [95%] in the PPB group and 10 patients [50%] in the control group were discharged on the day of surgery. By the six postoperative weeks all hemorrhoidectomy wounds were healed. PPB technique is safe and provide adequate anesthesia to perform hemorrhoidectomy associated with decreased postoperative pain, urinary retention as well as postoperative analgesic requirements


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Anestesia General , Anestesia Local , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Retención Urinaria , Dolor Postoperatorio , Amidas
2.
Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty [Girls] [The]. 2004; 25 (1): 463-472
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-111671

RESUMEN

This study was undertaken to assess-the effects of sevoflurane anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing Craniotomy as regarding intracranial Pressure [ICP], haemodynamics, Cerebral perfiisiom pressure [CPP] Brain swelling score [BSS] end tidal carbon dioxid, arterial oxygen saturation [PaO2] and emerganc critaria, In comparison with Isoflurane. 40 adult patients [16-78] year of age, ASA II or III scheduled for elective cranitomy 20 patient [group I] receive isoflurane and 20 patient [group II] receive sevoflurane as inhalational agent with fixed technique, [Induction, Maintianee, Brain protection, Recovery, Post operative] in both group.: and evolution the difference on the variable was done. Show no significant Intra group difference as regard HR, .MABP, ICP, BSS, end tidal carbon dioxid and PaO2 [P value>0.05]. In emergance from anaesthesia were generally rapid in both but the time to extubation was rapid in sevoflurane compared to isoflurane group and the time to commands was faster in sevofiurane group, time to orientation is more rapid in sevoflurane and the time-to reach modified-Alderete score was short in sevoflurane compared to Isoflurane group. Sevoflurane provide stable hemodynamic state with no significant effect on ICP. The Postanaesthetic recovery time was short in sevoflurane group than in Isoflurane group, this make the sevoflurane an attractive choice for a rapid emergenc


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Éteres Metílicos/efectos adversos , Isoflurano/efectos adversos , Estudio Comparativo , Presión Intracraneal , Craneotomía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA