RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a complex problem that is now considered a chronic metabolic disease. In Korea, phentermine has been widely used for the treatment of obesity in the primary care setting since 2004. However, there have been very few studies on the safety and efficacy of phentermine. To investigate the safety and efficacy of this drug, a postmarketing surveillance study was performed. METHODS: A total of 795 patients with obesity (body mass index > or = 25 kg/m2) were enrolled from 30 primary care centers in Korea from September 2006 to November 2007. Patients were examined to ascertain safety and efficacy at 4-, 8-, and 12-week intervals. The criterion for efficacy was defined as a weight loss > or = 5% of body weight. RESULTS: Of the 795 enrolled patients, 735 (92.5%) were evaluated in safety assessments and 711 (89.4%) was included in efficacy assessments. A total of 266 adverse events (AEs) were reported by 218 patients (30.6%), and no serious AEs were reported. Among 711 patients, 324 patients (45.6%) lost > or = 5% of their body weight. The mean weight loss was 3.8 +/- 4.0 kg. CONCLUSION: AEs are commonly associated with phentermine, even though phentermine is effective for weight loss and relatively well-tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Peso Corporal , Corea (Geográfico) , Enfermedades Metabólicas , Obesidad , Fentermina , Atención Primaria de Salud , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Combined therapy with alendronate and calcitriol may have additive effects on bone density. An observational study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Maxmarvil, a combinative agent of alendronate (5 mg) and calcitriol (0.5 microg), and to identify factors associated with efficacy. METHODS: A total of 568 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled by family physicians in 12 hospitals. The study subjects took Maxmarvil daily for 12 months. Questionnaires about baseline characteristics, socioeconomic status, and daily calcium intake were completed at the first visit. Adverse events were recorded every 3 months and bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12 months. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Maxmarvil, and the factors related to BMD improvement. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients were included in final analysis. The median BMD was 0.81 +/- 0.12 g/cm2 at pre-treatment and 0.84 +/- 0.13 g/cm2 after one year. The average BMD improvement was 3.4% +/- 6.4% (P < 0.05), and 167 (45.1%) patients showed improvement. Factors associated with improved BMD were continuation of treatment (odds ratio [OR], 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 5.07) and good compliance (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.29 to 5.00). Adverse events were reported by 35 of the 568 patients, with the most common being abdominal pain and dyspepsia. CONCLUSION: Maxmarvil was found to be safe, well tolerated and effective in osteoporosis treatment. Continuation of treatment and good compliance were the factors associated with efficacy.