Assessment of Dietary Intake of Vitamin K and Maximum Limits for Vitamin K in Food Supplements

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), evaluated the intake of vitamin K in the diet. VKM has also assessed the consequences of establishing maximum limits for vitamin K in food supplements at 100, 200, 300, 600 or 800 µg/day. The former maximum limit for vitamin K of 200 µg/day in food supplements was repealed 30 May 2017. Vitamin K is a fat-soluble vitamin required for the carboxylation of glutamic acid residues in proteins that regulate blood coagulation and bone metabolism. The naturally occurring forms of vitamin K present in food and supplements are phylloquinone (vitamin K1) mainly produced by plants, and a range of menaquinones (vitamin K2) mainly produced by bacteria. The chemical structure of vitamin K is characterised by a methylated naphtoquinone ring structure assumed to be responsible for its function, in addition to a side chain which differs in length and degree of saturation. Due to the varying side chains, the different forms of vitamin K are thought to behave differently with regard to absorption, metabolism, bioavailability and thereby also toxic potential. Dark green leafy vegetables are rich sources of phylloquinone. Meat and liver products provide menaquinone-4, the most common menaquinone in Western diets, while other menaquinones are found in fermented foods and cheese. An Adequate Intake (AI) of phylloquinone of 1 µg/kg body weight per day was set by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) in 1993 and maintained by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in 2017. No dietary reference values (DRVs) have been established for menaquinones due to insufficient evidence. Furthermore, no tolerable upper intake levels (ULs) have been established for any form of vitamin K due to insufficient evidence, but previous reports stated that no adverse effects associated with vitamin K consumption from food or supplements had been reported in humans or animals. In 2003, the UK Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals (EVM) proposed a guidance level (GL) for safe upper intake of supplemental phylloquinone of 1 mg/day in adults. The GL was set by applying an uncertainty factor of 10 for inter-individual variation to the supplemental dose of 10 mg/day that had been consumed by eight female athletes (age 20-44) for 30 days with no reported adverse effects. The UK expert group emphasised that GLs had been derived from limited data and were less secure than safe upper levels. This GL was supported by a double-blind randomised study cited in the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (2012), in which 440 postmenopausal women with osteopenia received a daily supplement of 5 mg phylloquinone or placebo for up to four years with no difference in adverse events between the randomised groups. Corresponding GLs for children and adolescents have been derived by adjusting for reference body weights0.75 by Rasmussen et al. (2006). The distribution of intakes of vitamin K across age groups in Norway is not known, since food composition data is not available. However, habitual intakes in a representative sample of middle-aged and older adults in Western Norway were assessed in the population-based Hordaland Health Study 1997-2000, and revealed higher intakes than those estimated from dietary surveys in the other Nordic countries. Due to lack of representative estimates of vitamin K intakes in the Norwegian population, information on vitamin K intakes from other Nordic countries is included in the current opinion. This includes the distribution of vitamin K intakes in Sweden and Finland reported by EFSA, and the distribution of vitamin K intakes in Denmark, assessed by the Technical University of Denmark (DTU). In middle-aged and older Western Norwegians participating in the Hordaland Health Study 1997-2000, estimated mean intakes of total vitamin K (denoting the sum of K1+K2) ranged from 109 to 148 µg/day in four groups based on age and gender, while the 95-percentiles ranged from 261 to 329 µg/day. Average intakes of total vitamin K in the other Nordic countries are in the magnitude of 100 µg/day in adults, while 95-percentiles in adults are in the magnitude of 200 µg/day. To illustrate the consequences of establishing maximum limits for vitamin K at 100, 200, 300, 600 or 800 µg/day in food supplements, VKM has compared these levels to the age-specific GLs for supplemental phylloquinone proposed by EVM (2003). The GLs are: 1000 µg/day for adults, 870 µg/day at age 15-17 years, 670 µg/day at age 11-14 years, 500 µg/day at age 710 years, 370 µg/day at age 4-6 years and 270 µg/day at age 1-3 years. VKM concludes that: In adults and adolescents 15-17 years old, maximum limits of 100, 200, 300, 600 and 800 µg/day are below GL. In adolescents 11-14 years old, maximum limits of 100, 200, 300 and 600 µg/day are below GL while the maximum limit of 800 µg exceeds GL. In children 4-10 years old, maximum limits of 100, 200 and 300 µg/day are below GL while maximum limits of 600 µg/day and 800 µg/day exceeds GL. In children 1-3 years old, maximum limits of 100 µg/day and 200 µg/day are below GL while maximum limits of 300, 600 and 800 µg/day exceeds GL. VKM notes that the current conclusions apply to phylloquinone (vitamin K1) only, while there is insufficient evidence to appraise potential health consequences of maximum limits of menaquinones (vitamin K2). VKM emphasises that the current assessment of maximum limits for vitamin K in food supplements is merely based on published reports concerning upper levels from the IOM (2001, USA), SCF (2003, EU), EVM (2003, UK) and NNR (2012, Nordic countries). VKM has not conducted any systematic review of the literature for the current opinion, as this was outside the scope of the terms of reference from NFSA.

Assessment of Dietary Intake of Molybdenum in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Level

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), evaluated the intake of molybdenum. VKM has also conducted scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of amending maximum limits for molybdenum to 100, 250, 500 or 1000 µg/day in food supplements. The previous maximum limit was 250 µg/day. Molybdenum is as a cofactor for some important enzymes in humans. These enzymes are involved in the catabolism of sulfur amino acids and heterocyclic compounds, including purines and pyridines. A distinct molybdenum deficiency has not been described in animals when subjected to molybdenum restriction, despite considerable reduction in the activity of molybdoenzymes. Molybdenum deficiency is not observed in healthy humans. The estimated Adequate Intake (AI) proposed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is 65 µg per day for men and women. Legumes, grains, and nuts are major contributors of molybdenum in the diet. Molybdenum is a potential antagonist to copper absorption, but symptoms of copper deficiencies due to excess molybdenum intake have only been observed in ruminants. Based on the effect on reproduction and growth in animals, tolerable upper intake levels (ULs) have been estimated to be 2 mg/day by the U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2001 and 0.6 mg/day by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) in 2000. These ULs were based on the same scientific evidence, but IOM used an uncertainty factor (UF) of 30 and SCF used a UF of 100 because the evidence base was considered to be weak. Because of the limited safety data on molybdenum, VKM support the use of the default uncertainty factors at 100 for extrapolation of data from animal studies to humans. Additionally, molybdenum deficiency is very rare and no studies have indicated a nutritional need for additional molybdenum from dietary supplements. The ULs for children were derived by adjusting the adult UL according to default body weights. According to the scenario estimations, only the highest suggested maximum limit of 1000 µg molybdenum from food supplements will lead to exceedance of the UL for adults. For 1-3 year old children, all the suggested maximum limits for molybdenum will lead to exceedance of the UL. In children 4-10 years, supplements with 250, 500 or 1000 µg molybdenum will lead to exceedance of the ULs, whereas for adolescents 11-17 years, the UL will be exceeded with supplemental doses at 500 or 1000 µg per day. VKM emphasises that the current assessment of maximum limits for molybdenum in food supplements is merely based on published reports concerning upper levels from the SCF (2000, EU), IOM (2001, USA), EVM (2003, UK) and NNR (2012, Nordic countries). VKM has not conducted any systematic review of the literature for the current opinion, as this was outside the scope of the terms of reference from NFSA.

Assessment of Dietary Intake of Manganese in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Level

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), evaluated the intake of manganese from the diet and 1, 5 or 10 mg manganese per day in food supplements. The former maximum limit for manganese in food supplements was 5 mg per daily dose. Manganese (Mn) is an essential dietary mineral for mammals, and is a component of metalloenzymes such as superoxide dismutase, arginase and pyruvate carboxylase. Manganese is involved in amino acid-, lipid- and carbohydrate metabolism and in proteoglycan synthesis in bone formation. In 2013, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) suggested 3 mg/day to represent an adequate intake (AI) of manganese because data was considered insufficient to set an average requirement (AR). Reports of adverse effects resulting from manganese exposure in humans are associated primarily with inhalation in occupational settings. Excess oral exposure to manganese, especially from contaminated water sources, has been shown to cause permanent neurological disorder known as “manganism” which can be irreversible. The amount of manganese absorbed is inversely related to the concentration of manganese in the diet. This regulation seems to be part of the adaptive changes to the amount of dietary manganese intake, which allow the maintenance of manganese homeostasis over a wide range of intakes. Manganese is mainly absorbed as Mn(II), and absorption is reported to be below 10% of ingested manganese. The main route of elimination of manganese from the body is via bile to the small intestine, while very little is excreted in the urine. Half-life for manganese can vary from 13 to 37 days, with a longer half-life in women than in men, but large inter-individual variation exists. In Norway, manganese content in drinking water is low, and does not contribute to any magnitude of manganese intake. Daily dietary intake of manganese in Norway is not known, but it is proposed that manganese intake is adequate in the Scandinavian countries (NNR Project Group, 2012). Results from the Swedish Market Basket study, 2015, indicate an average daily manganese intake of 4.2 mg per person and day. Calculations based on data from Denmark, 2013 and 2015, evaluate mean dietary intake of manganese to 3.9 mg/day for adults and up to 6.9 mg/day in the higher intake groups. EFSA report on an observed mean intake in EU around 3 mg/day for adults. Main contributor to dietary manganese intake is cereals (57%) followed by fruit, vegetables, nuts and coffee/tea. Irreversible neurotoxic adverse effects from intakes of manganese close to adequate intakes have been reported in humans (SCF, 2000). The Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) could not set a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL), because no relevant dose-response animal studies were found. Consequently SCF did not set a tolerable upper intake level (UL) for manganese. VKM considers that any dose of manganese as an ingredient in food supplements may be associated with increased risk of negative health effects. VKM emphasises that the current assessment of maximum limits for manganese in food supplements is merely based on published reports concerning upper levels from the IOM (2001, USA), SCF (2003, EU), EVM (2003, UK) and NNR (2012, Nordic countries). VKM has not conducted any systematic review of the literature for the current opinion, as this was outside the scope of the terms of reference from NFSA.

Risk Assessment of "Other Substances" – L-aspartic Acid

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the risk of "other substances" in food supplements and energy drinks sold in Norway. VKM has assessed the risk of doses in food supplements and concentrations in energy drinks given by NFSA. These risk assessments will provide NFSA with the scientific basis while regulating the addition of "other substances" to food supplements and other foods. "Other substances" are described in the food supplement directive 2002/46/EC as substances other than vitamins or minerals that have a nutritional and/or physiological effect. It is added mainly to food supplements, but also to energy drinks and other foods. VKM has not in this series of risk assessments of "other substances" evaluated any claimed beneficial effects from these substances, only possible adverse effects. The present report is a risk assessment of specified doses of L-aspartic acid in food supplements, and it is based on previous risk assessments and articles retrieved from literature searches. According to information from NFSA, L-aspartic acid is an ingredient in food supplements sold in Norway. NFSA has requested a risk assessment of 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000 and 5700 mg/day of L-aspartic acid in food supplements. L-aspartic acid is a dispensable dicarboxylic amino acid that can be produced by the transamination of oxaloacetic acid, an intermediate in the metabolism of e.g. glucose and some amino acids. L-aspartic acid is present in frequently consumed foods of animal and plant origin and is also a component of the sweetener aspartame. Dietary intake of aspartic acid in Norway is not known, but data from NHANES III (USA) suggest a mean dietary intake of about 6.5 g/day in adults. The highest intake was seen in men 31 through 50 years of age at the 99th percentile of 15.4 g/day. In the literature review we did not identify any long-term studies in human individuals that could be used for risk assessment. Short-term human studies found no adverse health effect when L-aspartic acid was given in acute doses ranging from 1 to 10 g/day, for time periods between one single dose and four weeks. None of these studies were undertaken to assess the toxicity of L-aspartic acid. In the literature search, two animal studies were identified of which one was a 90-day subchronic toxicity study. In that study, a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 697 mg/kg bw per day in male rats and 715 mg/kg bw per day in female rats was established. No neurotoxicity was found, however a toxic effect on kidneys and possibly salivary glands was observed at 1400 mg/kg bw per day (lowest observed adverse effect level, LOAEL). For the risk characterisation, the NOAEL of 697 mg/kg bw per day derived from the abovementioned subchronic toxicity study in rats was used for comparison with the estimated exposures from food supplements. The calculated Margin of Exposure (MOE) values for this NOAEL ranged from 5 to 16 for a daily intake of 3000-5700 mg/day of Laspartic acid. These low MOE-values may not be regarded as acceptable since L-aspartic acid has caused toxic effects on the kidneys (regenerative renal tubules with tubular dilation) and acinar cell hypertrophy of salivary glands in rats. Further, direct information regarding potential adverse health effects in humans is not available due to absence of long-term studies. In adults (≥18 years), adolescents (14 to < 18 years) and children (10 to < 14 years), the specified doses 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000 and 5700 mg/day L-aspartic acid in food supplements may represent a risk of adverse health effects. Children younger than 10 years were not within the scope of the present risk assessment.

Risk Assessment of "Other Substances" – Glycine

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the risk of "other substances" in food supplements and energy drinks sold in Norway. VKM has assessed the risk of doses given by NFSA. These risk assessments will provide NFSA with the scientific basis while regulating "other substances" in food supplements. "Other substances" are described in the food supplement directive 2002/46/EC as substances other than vitamins or minerals that have a nutritional and/ or physiological effect. It is added mainly to food supplements, but also to energy drinks and other foods. In this series of risk assessments of "other substances" VKM has not evaluated any claimed beneficial effects from these substances, only possible adverse effects. The present report is a risk assessment of specified doses of glycine in food supplements, and it is based on previous risk assessments and articles retrieved from two literature searches. Glycine is a non-essential amino acid which is synthesised from 3-phosphoglycerate via serine, or derived from threonine, choline and hydroxyproline via inter-organ metabolism involving primarily the liver and kidneys. Endogeneous synthesis is estimated to be in the magnitude of 8 g per day in adults. Glycine is a constituent of all proteins in the human body. It also functions as a neurotransmitter, and can play both stimulatory and depressant roles in the brain. Data on dietary intake of glycine in Norway are not available. Based on NHANES III (1988-1994), the overall mean intake of glycine from food and food supplements in the United States was 3.2 g per day. Thus, the combined dietary intake and endogenous synthesis is more than 11 g per day. Because glycine is not considered an essential amino acid, a dietary requirement in healthy humans has not been established. Foods rich in glycine are generally protein rich foods such as meat, fish, dairy products and legumes. According to information from NFSA, glycine is an ingredient in food supplements sold in Norway. NSFA has requested a risk assessment of 20, 50, 100, 300, 500 and 650 mg/day of glycine from food supplements. There is a lack of relevant supplementation studies with glycine in humans designed to address adverse effects and/or dose-response relationship, and none of the previous reports reviewed concluded with a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL). For the current risk assessment, two literature searches were conducted, one for human studies and one for animal studies. No human studies were found that can be used for suggesting a "value for comparison", and there are no scientific data in the published literature suitable for assessing the specific doses in the terms of reference. The value for comparison used in this risk characterisation is 20 mg/kg per day. This value is derived from a study in rats in which the NOAEL was estimated at 2000 mg/kg per day. Using an uncertainty factor of 100, this corresponds to 20 mg/kg per day or 1.4 g per day for a person weighing 70 kg. This is more than twice as high as the highest dose for consideration in the present risk assessment, and it is far below the combined dietary intake and endogenous synthesis estimated at more than 11 g per day. No particular vulnerable groups for glycine supplements have been identified. VKM concludes that: In adults (≥18 years), the specified doses 20, 50, 100, 300, 500 and 650 mg/day of glycine from food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In adolescents (14 to <18 years), the specified doses 20, 50, 100, 300, 500 and 650 mg/day of glycine from food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In children (10 to <14 years), the specified doses 20, 50, 100, 300, 500 and 650 mg/day of glycine from food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. Children younger than 10 years were not within the scope of the present risk assessment.

Risk Assessment of "Other Substances" – L-proline

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the risk of "other substances" in food supplements and energy drinks sold in Norway. VKM has assessed the risk of doses given by NFSA. These risk assessments will provide NFSA with the scientific basis while regulating "other substances" in food supplements. "Other substances" are described in the food supplement directive 2002/46/EC as substances other than vitamins or minerals that have a nutritional and/ or physiological effect. It is added mainly to food supplements, but also to energy drinks and other foods. In this series of risk assessments of "other substances" VKM has not evaluated any claimed beneficial effects from these substances, only possible adverse effects. The present report is a risk assessment of specified doses of L-proline in food supplements, and it is based on previous risk assessments and articles retrieved from literature searches. According to information from NFSA, L-proline is an ingredient in food supplements sold in Norway. NSFA has requested a risk assessment of 50, 500, 1000, 1500 and 1800 mg/day of L-proline from food supplements. L-proline is considered a non-essential amino acid as it can be synthesised from arginine via the urea cycle in liver, and from glutamine/glutamic acid in the intestinal epithelium. In addition, L-proline is ingested through the diet. All protein rich foods provide L-proline, and animal proteins from milk and meat are particularly abundant sources. A dietary requirement for proline in healthy humans has not been estimated since proline is not considered an essential amino acid. Data on dietary intake of L-proline in Norway are not available. In the third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III; 1988-1994), overall mean intake of L-proline from food and supplements was 5.2 g/day. A previous report from the Institute of Medicine (2005) cited one small uncontrolled patient study (n=4) and two animal studies, none of which assessed the toxicity of L-proline in a dose-response manner. The report concluded that a tolerable upper intake level for L-proline could not be determined. In a risk grouping of amino acids from VKM (2011), proline was categorised as having potentially moderate risk, based on the scarce literature and the notion that amino acids are generally bioactive compounds. It was stated that "no conclusion can be drawn on a scientific basis due to lack of adequate scientific literature. Nor will it be possible to conduct a risk assessment until further studies are available". Three systematic literature searches without restriction on publication year were performed for the current risk assessment, aimed at identifying adverse effects of L-proline supplementation in human and animal studies. In humans, one uncontrolled experimental study was identified where a single oral dose of 500 mg/kg bw L-proline was administered as a growth hormone stimulatory agent to 20 children with hyposomatotropic dwarfism and 20 healthy children. No adverse effects were observed. In animals, one relevant subchronic (90 days) toxicological dose-response study in rats was included and forms the basis for the current risk assessment. In that study, performed in accordance with official guidelines from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, there were no indications of toxicity at the highest dose given through a powder diet (5.0% L-proline). This dose corresponded to 2773 mg L-proline/kg bw per day and was used as a no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL). Studies to set a tolerance level for L-proline for children or adolescents have not been found. Therefore, an assumption is made that these age groups have similar tolerance as adults relative to their body weight. To evaluate the safety of the specific doses given by NFSA, margin of exposure (MOE) was calculated with use of 2773 mg L-proline/kg bw per day as NOAEL. For the highest dose (1800 mg/day) MOE is 67 (= 2773* 43.3/1800) in children 10 to <14 years (default body weight 43.3 kg), and 94 (= 2773* 61.3/1800) in adolescents 14 to <18 years (default body weight 61.3 kg). For the dose of 1500 mg/day, the MOE in children is 80. MOE for all the other doses and age categories are above 100. Based on the magnitude of MOE, the lack of adverse effects at the highest dose tested (current NOAEL) and the notion that L-proline is a nutrient that is synthesised endogenously from other amino acids in addition to a dietary intake in the magnitude of 5 grams per day, VKM concludes that: In adults (≥18 years), the specified doses 50, 500, 1000, 1500 and 1800 mg/day Lproline in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In adolescents (14 to <18 years), the specified doses 50, 500, 1000, 1500 and 1800 mg/day L-proline in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In children (10 to <14 years), the specified doses 50, 500, 1000, 1500 and 1800 mg/day L-proline in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. Children younger than 10 years were not within the scope of the present risk assessment.

Risk Assessment of "Other Substances"-Beta-Alanine

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the risk of "other substances" in food supplements and energy drinks sold in Norway. VKM has assessed the risk of doses given by NFSA. These risk assessments will provide NFSA with the scientific basis while regulating "other substances" in food supplements. "Other substances" are described in the food supplement directive 2002/46/EC as substances other than vitamins or minerals that have a nutritional and/or physiological effect. It is added mainly to food supplements, but also to energy drinks and other foods. In this series of risk assessments of "other substances" the VKM has not evaluated any claimed beneficial effects from these substances, only possible adverse effects. The present report is a risk assessment of specified doses of beta-alanine in food supplements, and it is based on previous risk assessments and articles retrieved from literature searches. According to information from NFSA, beta-alanine is an ingredient in food supplements sold in Norway. NSFA has requested a risk assessment of beta-alanine: 1000, 1500 and 2000 mg/day from food supplements. Beta-alanine is a non-essential, non-proteogenic naturally occurring beta amino acid. Beta-alanine is a component of the naturally occurring peptides carnosine, anserine and balenine. Supplementation with beta-alanine leads to an increased production of the peptide carnosine, which is found in high concentrations in the skeletal muscle of both vertebrates and non-vertebrates. Data suggest that beta-alanine functions as a small molecule neurotransmitter and should join the ranks of the other amino acid neurotransmitters. The only observed adverse effect from beta-alanin supplementation in humans is transient (1-2 hours) paraesthesia and flushing. Paraesthesia is characterised by a stinging or prickling sensation in the skin. There is no evidence that the paraesthesia in the skin is harmful in any way. Long-term studies in humans were not found. Four small human clinical studies have been included in this risk assessment. The occurrence of paraesthesia apparently is dependent on the magnitude of the individual doses that the daily dose is split into. Single doses of beta-alanine of 10 mg/kg bw (700 mg in a 70 kg person) or more provoked transient paraesthesia. Symptom occurrence and severity increased with the dose. Repeated intakes of 5 mg beta-alanine/kg bw or less taken with >2 hours intervals did not induce paraesthesia. Haematology and plasma clinical chemistry was found normal after daily doses of 2.8 g and 3.2 g for 4 weeks in healthy adults. Apart from occasional paraesthesia, a daily dose of 6.4 g for up to seven weeks did not induce any adverse clinical effects in healthy adults of 80 kg, corresponding to a dose of 5.6 g per day in a 70-kg person. We are not aware of any data indicating that children and adolescents are more vulnerable than adults for supplementation with beta-alanine on a per kg bw basis. No relevant animal studies were identified. VKM concludes that: In adults (≥18 years), the specified doses 1000, 1500 and 2000 mg/day of beta-alanine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects provided that beta-alanine is consumed with maximum 5 mg/kg bw per intake and a minimum of 2 hours between the intakes. In adolescents (14 to <18 years) and children (10 to <14 years) the specified doses 1000, 1500 and 2000 mg/day of beta-alanine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects provided that beta-alanine is consumed with maximum 5 mg/kg bw per intake and a minimum of 2 hours between the intakes. Children younger than 10 years were not within the scope of the present risk assessment.

Risk Assessment of "Other Substances" – L-alanine

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the risk of "other substances" in food supplements and energy drinks sold in Norway. VKM has assessed the risk of doses given by NFSA. These risk assessments will provide NFSA with the scientific basis while regulating "other substances" in food supplements. "Other substances" are described in the food supplement directive 2002/46/EC as substances other than vitamins or minerals that have a nutritional and/ or physiological e ffect . It is added mainly to food supplements, but also to energy drinks and other foods. In this series of risk assessments of "other substances" the VKM has not evaluated any claimed beneficial effects from these substances, only possible adverse effects. For the current report VKM has studied previous risk assessments and performed two systematic literature searches for any published studies assessing negative health effects of L-alanine in humans or animals. According to information from NFSA, L-alanine is an ingredient in food supplements sold in Norway. NSFA has requested a risk assessment of L-alanine: 3500, 3750, 4000, 4250 and 4500 mg/day. Foods rich in alanine are generally protein rich foods such as meat, dairy products, legumes, fish, nuts, seeds, eggs and whole grains. Based on NHANES III (19881994), the overall mean intake of L-alanine from food and food supplements in the United States was 3.6 g/day. L-alanine is a naturally occurring non-essential α-amino acid belonging to the group of the 20 amino acids that are normal components of food proteins. L-alanine acts as an intermediary between protein catabolism and carbohydrate synthesis. It can be easily synthesised from the alpha keto acid pyruvate and has close links to several metabolic pathways including glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and the citric acid cycle. Together with lactate it is capable of generating glucose from muscle protein through gluconeogenesis in the liver. Alanine thus plays a central role in the metabolism of muscle protein and is a key factor in nitrogen metabolism. Previous reports from the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2005, the French Food Safety Agency (AFSSA) 2007 and the Spanish Agency for Food Safety and Nutrition (AESAN) 2012 did not conclude regarding safe doses of L-alanine, but stated that data on adverse effects of L-alanine intake from supplements were not sufficient for a dose-response assessment and establishment of a tolerable upper intake level. Few studies have assessed health effects of L-alanine supplementation in humans, and these were generally not designed to evaluate potential harmful effects of L-alanine. Most human experimental studies gave single doses (up to 50 g) or short-term loading doses (e.g. 25 to 45 g/hour during exercise) to study metabolic responses such as ergogenic effects during exercise or prevention of ketosis after fasting. Adverse health effects were not reported except for abdominal discomfort and stomach cramps, nausea and diarrhea after consuming high doses. No studies assessed long-term effects of L-alanine supplementation, and no studies gave doses comparable to the doses under consideration in the present report. Only one dose-reponse toxicity study in rodents has been found (Chow et al., 1976). In that study, growing Wistar rats were fed up to 20% DL-alanine (a racemic mixture of D- and Lalanine) in their basal diet for 26 weeks, with no effect on liver and kidney weight and no pathological changes in any organs. The study was taken into account due to the otherwise scarce literature on L-alanine toxicity, and could be used since there were no adverse effects at the highest dose tested. The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) in mg L-alanine per kg body weight per day was not stated. VKM has therefore estimated the NOAEL using information about average reported feed consumption and average body weights of the animals, and divided by 2 to obtain a NOAEL for L-alanine, arriving at approximately 6450 mg/kg bw/day in male rats and 9700 mg/kg bw/day in female rats. A standard toxicological approach dividing by an uncertainty factor (UF) of 10 for between-species variation and an additional UF of 10 for within-species variation gives the value of 64.5 mg/kg bw per day in females and 97.0 mg/kg bw per day in males, corresponding to approximately 4500 mg/day and 6800 mg/day for a 70 kg man and woman, respectively. VKM also calculated the margins of exposure (MOE) between the estimated NOAEL and the estimated daily exposures from the five supplement doses given by the NFSA (based on default average body weights for the age groups). MOE were 100 or higher for all five doses in adults. For adolescents 14 to <18 years, the MOE was 88 for the highest dose under consideration. For children 10 to <14 years, MOE ranged from 62 for the highest dose to 80 for the lowest dose. The VKM considers that these margins are relatively high and are acceptable based on the following considerations: The highest dose tested in growing rats did not cause adverse effects, implying that the “true” NOAEL is unknown and could be considerably higher. Furthermore, L-alanine is a nutrient participating in normal energy metabolism as a substrate for glucose. It is consumed in the magnitude of 3 to 4 g/day on average in the habitual diet, and it has not been associated with harmful effects in humans beyond gastrointestinal effects when consuming very high single doses (50 g, or at a consumption rate of 30 to 45 grams per hour during exercise). VKM concludes that: In adults (≥18 years), the specified doses 3500, 3750, 4000, 4250 and 4500 mg/day L-alanine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In adolescents (14 to <18 years), the specified doses 3500, 3750, 4000, 4250 and 4500 mg/day L-alanine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In children (10 to <14 years), the specified doses 3500, 3750, 4000, 4250 and 4500 mg/day L-alanine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. Children younger than 10 years were not within the scope of the present risk assessment.

Assessment of Iron Intake in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Levels

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the intake of iron in the Norwegian population in relation to tolerable upper intake levels (ULs). The existing maximum limit for iron in food supplements is 27 mg/day. VKM has also conducted scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of amending the maximum limit to 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 or 50 mg/day. Iron deficiency is one of the most common nutritional disorders in the world. Individuals with increased iron demand such as growing children and pregnant women, those who experience blood loss such as menstruating women are particularly at risk for the consequences or iron deficiency. Iron deficiency can lead to fatigue and anaemia. The most common adverse effects of iron supplementation are reversible gastrointestinal symptoms. Chronic iron excess can lead to iron overload which is associated with several irreversible severe health outcomes such as cancers and cardiovascular diseases. Up to 1% of the population have a genetic trait that leads to accumulation of iron and renders them more vulnerable to iron excess. An adult needs approximately 10 mg iron per day to overcome daily loss. The tolerable upper intake level (UL) for iron in adults range from 45 to 60 mg/day. However, all previous reports acknowledge the challenges in defining upper levels. The Expert Group on Vitamins and minerals (EVM), UK report provided a guidance level (GL) of 17 instead of a UL and the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNR) (2012) suggested an UL of 60 mg/day, but did not suggest any clear upper levels for children. Institute of Medicine (IOM), US (2001) gives the most substantiated tolerable upper intake levels based on gastrointestinal effects, which is 40 mg/day for infants and children, regardless of age, and 45 mg/day for adolescents and adults. The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2003 (JECFA) also took the potential serious effects of iron overload into account and suggested a GL of 50 mg/day in adults or 0.8 mg/kg per day in children and adolescents. Because the risks and consequences from overload are significant and potentially serious, VKM suggests that the GL from JECFA (2003) is used. Using the GL from JECFA (2003), none of the suggested doses can be given to 2 or 4-yearold children, 9 year olds can add 5 mg iron from supplements, 13 year olds 20, and adults 30 mg without exceeding the guidance levels.

Assessment of Vitamin B6 Intake in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Levels

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the intake of vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) in the Norwegian population in relation to tolerable upper intake levels (ULs). The existing maximum limit for vitamin B6 in food supplements is 4.2 mg/day. VKM has also conducted scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of amending the maximum limitto 2, 6, 8, 10, 20 or 25 mg/day. Vitamin B6 is water soluble and comprises six compounds with vitamin B6 activity; pyridoxine (PN, an alcohol), pyridoxal (PL, an aldehyde) and pyridoxamine (PM, the amine) and their corresponding phosphates; pyridoxine 5’-phosphate (PNP), pyridoxal 5’ -phosphate (PLP) and pyridoaxamin 5’ –phosphate (PMP). These six forms of vitamin B6 are all present in food in addition to the glycosylated form, pyridoxine-5’-β-δ-glucoside (PNG), in some plants. In food supplements the most common vitamin B6 form is pyridoxine hydrochloride. Eighty to ninety percent of vitamin B6 in the body is found in muscles and estimated body stores in adults amount to about 170 mg with a half-life of 25-33 days. Vitamin B6 deficiency is mostly seen in combination with deficiency of other B vitamins. Symptoms of vitamin B6 deficiency are anaemia and neurological abnormalities (EFSA, 2016). Intakes of vitamin B6 from the diet alone have not been reported to cause adverse effects. Sensory neuropathy has been reported to be the most sensitive adverse health effect of vitamin B6 supplementation. VKM proposes to adopt the tolerable upper intake level (UL) set by the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) in 2000 at 25 mg/day for vitamin B6, which was based on a lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of 100 mg/day found in one randomised controlled trial. VKM recognises that there are no well-designed dose-response studies of long-term use available. However, for adults, no adverse effects have been reported at doses with vitamin B6 up to 25 mg/day. Dietary calculations have been performed for mean intakes and in various percentiles (P5, P25, P50, P75 and P95) in children (2-, 4- and 9-year-olds), adolescents (13-year-olds) and in adults. To illustrate the consequences of amending the maximum limit for vitamin B6 in food supplements to 2, 6, 8, 10, 20 or 25 mg/day in the different age groups, VKM has used the scenarios with P95 from food and added the alternative amounts of supplements. VKM has compared these scenarios with the tolerable upper intake levels set by the Scientific Committee for Food in 2000 for adults, adolescents and children. In these scenarios, the 2- and 4-year-old children will exceed the tolerable upper intake level with use of 6 mg/day or higher vitamin B6 in supplements. The 9-year-old children will exceed the tolerable upper intake level with supplemental use of 10 mg/day. The 13-year-old adolescents will exceed the tolerable upper intake level with 20 mg/day of vitamin B6 in supplements. Adults will exceed the tolerable upper intake level with use of 25 mg/day of vitamin B6/pyridoxine in supplements.

Assessment of Vitamin E Intake in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Levels

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the intake of vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) in the Norwegian population in relation to tolerable upper intake levels (ULs). The existing maximum limit for vitamin E in food supplements is 30 mg/day. VKM was also requested to conduct scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of amending the maximum limit for alpha-tocopherol to 15, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 300 mg/day. Naturally vitamin E is a fat soluble compound synthesised by plants and consists of eight different tocopherols (α-, β-, γ- and δ- tocopherols and α-, β-, γ- and δ- tocotrienols) with varying vitamin E antioxidant activity. α-Tocopherol is recognised to meet human vitamin E requirements and accounts for 90% of the activity in human tissue. Vitamin E activity in food is expressed as α-tocopherol equivalents (α-TE) and 1 α-TE is defined as 1 mg d-αtocopherol. The physiological role of vitamin E is to react with free radicals in cell membranes and other lipid milieu, thereby preventing polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) from being damaged by lipid peroxidation. This antioxidant activity is important to maintain membrane integrity and takes place in all cells in the body. Vitamin E deficiency symptoms include peripheral neuropathy, ataxia, myopathy and retinopathy. Vitamin E is dependent on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and it takes decades for body depletion. The Norwegian recommended intakes for vitamin E for adults are 10 αTE/day for men and 8 α-TE/day for women. There is no evidence of adverse effects from the consumption of vitamin E naturally occurring in foods. Animal studies have shown that α-tocopherol is not mutagenic, carcinogenic or teratogenic. However, high doses of α-tocopherol supplements can cause haemorrhage and interrupt blood coagulation. VKM propose to adopt the tolerable upper intake level set by the Scientific Committee for Food Safety (SCF) which is based on one human dose-response study. Hence, the upper level for supplemental vitamin E is suggested to 300 mg/day for adults. The upper level for children and adolescents is derived from scaling the adult upper level based on body surface area (body weight 0.75). The tolerable upper intake levels set for vitamin E concern only intake from supplements, since intake of vitamin E from the diet is considered safe. VKM has therefore not conducted or evaluated scenarios with intake from both diet and supplements. Dietary calculations have, however, been performed for intake in various percentiles (P) P5, P25, mean, P50, P75 and P95 in children (2- 4- and 9-year-olds), adolescents (13-year-olds) and in adult men and women as background information. Mean and median intakes of vitamin E are above the recommended intakes for all age groups. No age group reaches the recommended intake at P5, and 9- and 13-year-old boys and 9-year-old girls do not reach the recommended intake at P25 from diet alone. Because the tolerable upper intake level for supplemental vitamin E for adults is 300 mg/day, none of the suggested amendments of the maximum limit in food supplements (to 15, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 300 mg/day) will lead to exceedance of this upper level in adults. In 13year-olds supplements with 300 mg/day vitamin E will lead to exceedance of the upper level. In 9-year-olds supplements with 200 mg/day vitamin E will lead to exceedance of the upper level. In 4- and 2-year-olds supplements with 150 mg/day vitamin E will lead to exceedance of the upper level. Vitamin E intake from fortified products is not included in the calculations, but are however, evaluated to be very low.

Assessment of Zinc Intake in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Levels

The Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA, Mattilsynet) has requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) to assess the intake of iron zinc in the Norwegian population in relation to tolerable upper intake levels (ULs). The existing maximum limit for zinc in food supplements is 25 mg/day. VKM has also conducted scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of amending the maximum limit to 1, 2, 5, 10, 15 or 20 mg/day. Zinc is an essential trace element required for RNA, DNA and protein synthesis, cellular division, differentiation and growth (Mac Donald, 2000). Zinc is required for catalytic function in several enzymes and participates in all major biochemical pathways in the body. The function of the immune system depends on the ability of its cells to proliferate and differentiate, which is impaired in individuals with suboptimal zinc status (Barton et al. 2000). Due to its role in cell division and differentiation, adequate zinc nutrition is particularly important in children, and the requirements per kg body weight are highest in early life. The endogenous intestinal losses can vary from 7 mmol/day (0.5 mg/day) to more than 45 mmol/day (3 mg/day), depending on zinc intake (King and Turnlund, 1989). The requirements for zinc vary according to age and bioavailability. Several bioactive compounds in food such as tannins and phytic acids interact with zinc absorption and increase zinc requirements. The requirements vary twenty-fold according to life stage and diet. Zinc supplements, even at or slightly above the recommended intakes, can cause nausea and vomiting. The main concern with chronic zinc excess is, however, copper deficiency which is associated with several chronical illnesses. However, copper deficiency is uncommon due to the ubiquitous presence of copper in the diet. VKM proposes to use the ULs set by IOM (2001) as they provide values also for children and adolescents. The tolerable upper intake level set for adults is 40 mg zinc per day from food (and water) and supplements. Based on the scenario estimations, a dietary zinc intake at the 95th percentile and additionally 20 mg zinc from food supplements will lead to an intake close to the tolerable upper intake level established by IOM for adults. For adolescents and child populations the maximum amounts are 15 and 5 mg for 13- and 9-year-olds, respectively. For 2 and 4-yearolds, P95 from intake of zinc from food alone exceeds the UL.

Assessment of Dietary Intake of Potassium in Relation to Upper Guidance Level

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), evaluated the intake of potassium in the Norwegian population. VKM has also evaluated the consequences of amending the existing maximum limit for potassium at 1000 mg/day to 300, 2000 or 3000 mg/day in food supplements. Potassium is an essential mineral to humans and is important as the osmotically active element inside the cells, whereas sodium and chloride are the main elements outside the cells. The enzyme Na+/K+ -ATPase pumps potassium ions into the cells and sodium ions out of the cells and helps keep the intracellular potassium concentration about 30 times higher than that of plasma and interstitial fluids. The plasma potassium concentration is maintained within narrow limits (3.5 to 5.0 mmol/L) by multiple mechanisms making up the potassium homeostasis. The strict regulation is essential for a broad array of important physiological processes, like the resting cellular membrane potential and the transmission action in neuronal, muscular and cardiac tissue. Potassium is also important for hormone secretion, vascular tone, systemic blood pressure control, gastrointestinal motility, acid-base balance, glucose and insulin metabolism, mineralocorticoid action, renal concentration ability and fluid and electrolyte balance. Both hypo- and hyperkalaemia result in increased mortality. The EFSA recommendations (2016) for adequate intake (AI) of potassium is 3500 mg/day for adults, both sexes, whereas the recommended intake (RI) in the Nordic Nutrition recommendations (2012) is 3500 mg/day for men and 3100 mg/day for women. Tolerable upper intake levels have not been established for potassium from food, because intake from food has not caused adverse health effects in the healthy population. In children the renal function rapidly reaches the normal adult level in early childhood and no concern about high intake of potassium from food has been put forward. Potassium chloride supplement has, however, resulted in hyperkalaemia and case reports have described heart failure and cardiac arrest at plasma concentrations above 5.5 mmol/L and doses over 6.5 - 6.8 g supplementary potassium per day. VKM proposes to use 3000 mg/day of potassium as an upper guidance level for daily dose of supplemental potassium in adults since this dose has not been shown to cause hyperkalaemia or heart failure, and has not resulted in gastrointestinal lesions. The proposed upper guidance level for adults extrapolated for body weights corresponds to 2630 mg/day for adolescents 14 to <18 years, 1860 mg/day for children 10 to < 14 years and 990 mg/day for children 3 to 10 years. For vulnerable groups all doses of potassium supplementation could lead to hyperkalaemia. Vulnerable groups such as persons with impaired kidney function and elderly have been estimated to comprise 15-20% of the population of Norway. However, most of the vulnerable individuals will be aware of the condition and be under medical supervision. Accordingly, all the evaluated doses from NFSA (300, 1000, 2000 and 3000 mg/day of potassium in food supplements are at or below the suggested upper guidance level for supplemental potassium for adults (>18 years). In adolescents 14 to <18 years, the supplemental doses of 300, 1000 and 2000 mg/day are below the suggested upper guidance level. For the younger age groups, only 300 mg/day is below the suggested upper guidance level for supplemental potassium.

Assessment of Dietary Intake of Phosphorus in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Levels

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), evaluated the intake of phosphorus in the Norwegian population. VKM has also conducted scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of amending maximum limits for phosphorus (to 1000, 2000 or 2500 mg/day) in food supplements. Phosphorus is an essential nutrient and is involved in many physiological processes, such as in the cell’s energy cycle, in regulation of the body’s acid-base balance, as a component of the cell structure, in cell regulation and signalling, and in the mineralisation of bones and teeth. In the human body, phosphorus is present in different forms. Serum contains mainly inorganic phosphates (Pi) (dihydrogen and monohydrogen phosphate), bone contains phosphorus largely in the form of hydroxyapatite, whereas the soft tissues and extracellular fluids contain organic phosphates in complex with carbohydrates, lipids and proteins. Phosphorus is the main mineral constituent of bones. About 85% of the body’s phosphorus is in bones and teeth, and together with calcium account for around 80-90% of bone composition. The remaining 15% of the body’s phosphorus is essential in functions ranging from the transfer of genetic information to energy utilisation. Phosphorus is a structural component of the nucleic acids DNA and RNA and thus involved in the storage and transmission of genetic material. It is an essential component of phospholipids (e.g. phosphatidylcholine) that form all membrane bilayers throughout the body. Phosphorus is also an essential component of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the body’s key energy source. Currently there is no reliable biomarker of phosphorus status, and serum phosphorus increases for a short period after ingestion of a meal and then decreases and remains within a relatively narrow range as a result of homeostatic mechanisms. The EFSA recommendations (2015) for adequate intake (AI) of phosphorus is 550 mg/day for adults, both sexes, whereas the recommended intake (RI) in the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (2012) is 600 mg/day. Adolescents have a higher requirement of phosphorous because of bone accretion (640 mg/day EFSA and 700 mg/day NNR). EFSA (2005) concluded that the available data were not sufficient to establish a tolerable upper level for phosphorus, however, data indicate that normal healthy individuals can tolerate phosphorus intakes up to 3000 mg/day. EFSA advised supplemental intake not to exceed 750 mg/day, because mild gastrointestinal symptoms have been reported when this dose was increased. EFSA gave no UL suggestions for children, lactating or pregnant women, while Institute of Medicine set a UL for total intake of phosphorous for children at 3000 mg/day and 4000 mg/day for adolescents and adults and 3500 mg/day for lactating women. In accordance with EFSA (2005), VKM suggests to use 3000 mg/day as a provisional UL for total intake of phosphorous for adults, and suggests 750 mg/day as an upper level for supplements. Because of lack of data no provisional ULs are set for adolescents or children. Accordingly, all the suggested doses from NFSA (1000, 2000 and 2500 mg/day) in supplements exceed 750 mg/day, the suggested UL for supplemental phosphorus for adults.

Assessment of Dietary Intake of Chromium (III) in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Level

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), evaluated the intake of chromium. VKM has also conducted scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of establishing maximum limit for chromium at 50, 125, 200 or 300 μg/day in food supplements. The former maximum limit for chromium of 125 μg/day in food supplements was revoked 30 May 2017. Chromium is present in food and supplements mainly as trivalent chromium, Cr(III), whereas in drinking water, chromium is present mainly as Cr(VI). Trivalent chromium has been reported to be an essential trace element in that it has been postulated to be necessary for the efficacy of insulin in regulation of the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids and proteins. However, no mechanisms for these roles have been identified. Absorption of Cr(III) from food has been estimated to range from 0.4 to 2.5%, depending among other factors on the chemical properties of the ingested source and the presence of other dietary components. Absorption efficiency of supplemental Cr(III) has been reported to be between 0.1 and 5.2%, and to vary between the chromium complex ingested. In general, Cr(III) has very low toxicity by the oral route (ATSDR, 2012), and there are hardly any well-documented observations of toxicity after peroral intake in humans. In a series of animal repeat dose toxicity studies, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for general toxicity was consistently the highest dose tested (EFSA, 2014b). Chromium is ubiquitous in foods, and rich sources include meat and meat products, oils and fats, breads and cereals, fish, pulses and spices. There are no Norwegian recommendations for intake of chromium. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded that no recommendations could be given for chromium due to lack of sufficient evidence (EFSA, 2014a; NNR Project Group, 2012). Furthermore, no tolerable upper intake levels (UL) have been established for chromium. However, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) suggested a tolerable daily intake (TDI) at 300 μg trivalent chromium per kg bodyweight per day based on a NOAEL in a rat study and an uncertainty factor at 1000. Due to uncertainty in the available data on developmental and reproduction toxicity, the EFSA Panel applied an uncertainty factor of 10 in addition to the default uncertainty factor of 100 for the extrapolations from rodents to humans and for human variability. The chromium intake in Norway is not known, since Norwegian food composition data are not available. VKM has therefore based this evaluation upon intake data from EFSA. Values from EFSA are likely to be valid also for Norway. Median dietary chromium intakes were 28.6 -44.0 μg/day (medians of lower and upper bound) in the category toddlers (1 to < 3 years), 55.4-76.2 μg/day in other children (3 to < 10 years), 52.1-69.4 μg/day in adolescents (≥10 to <14 years), 73.6-98.1 in adolescents (≥14 to <18 years) and 63.0-84.0 μg/day in adults (18-65 years) (EFSA, 2014b). These values are 80-300 times lower than the suggested tolerable daily intake (TDI). To illustrate the consequences of amending maximum limits for chromium to 50, 125, 200 or 300 μg per daily dose in food supplements, VKM has compared these levels and various intakes from food to the TDI at 300 μg/kg bw per day. Even with the highest level of supplemental intake and additional median levels as well as the 95 percentile intakes from food, the estimated exposure will be 16-48 times lower than the TDI of 300 μg/kg bw per day in all age groups except for the 95 th percentile intake in toddlers, where it will be about nine times lower. VKM emphasises that the current assessment of maximum limits for Cr(III) in food supplements is merely based on published reports concerning upper levels from the WHO (1996), IOM (2001, USA), SCF (2003, EU), EVM (2003, UK) , NNR (2012, Nordic countries), and EFSA (2014b). VKM has not conducted any systematic review of the literature for the current opinion, as this was outside the scope of the terms of reference from NFSA.

Assessment of Copper Intake in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Levels

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), evaluated the intake of copper in the Norwegian population in relation to tolerable upper intake levels (ULs). VKM has also conducted scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of amending maximum limits for copper to 1, 2, or 3, mg/day in food supplements. The existing maximum limit is 4 mg/day. Copper is a micronutrient essential for energy utilisation, brain function (neurotransmitter regulation), soft tissue and bone (collagen synthesis), nutrient metabolism (especially iron) and antioxidant defence against free radicals. Foods account for 90% or more of copper intake in adults when the copper content in drinking water is low (< 0.1 mg/L). If the copper content is higher (> 1-2 mg/L), water may account for up to 50% of total intake (EFSA, 2015). We reviewed four risk assessments undertaken by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), Scientific Committee on Food (SCF), Expert Committee on Vitamins and Minerals (EVM), and the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNR). Liver damage was selected as a critical endpoint from which to derive a UL because it was judged to be the most reliable marker and consequence of a long-term chronic high copper intake. However, copper-related liver damage is observed almost exclusively in patients with genetic predispositions of copper accumulation. VKM suggest to use the UL at 5 mg/day (NNR Project Group, 2012; SCF, 2003). This UL was derived from human studies.In the light of the evidence, SCF decided that an uncertainty factor (UF) of 2 was adequate to allow for potential variability within the normal population, whereas the Institute of Medicine (IOM) applied a UF of 1. VKM find the higher UF suitable because human data is limited, the uncertainty of the copper content of drinking water and the potential severe and irreversible adverse effects. According to the scenario calculations, adults and 13-year-olds with high copper intakes from regular foods (95 th percentile) will exceed the ULs with supplemental copper at doses of 3 mg/day or higher. 9-year-old children will exceed the UL with use of 2 mg supplemental copper per day. For younger children the ULs will be exceeded in more than 5% without adding supplemental copper. In our calculations, copper from drinking water is not included. Copper concentrations in annual samples from waterworks are in general below 0.1 mg/L (Nordheim et al., 2016).

Assessment of Intake of Nicotinic Acid and Nicotinamide in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Levels

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the intake of niacin in the Norwegian population. NFSA has also requested that VKM conduct scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of establishing separate maximum limits for nicotinic acid (1, 4, 8 or 10 mg/day) and nicotinamide (100, 500, 700 or 900 mg/day) in food supplements, by assessing these scenarios against existing tolerable upper intake levels (ULs). The current maximum limit for niacin added to food supplements is 32 mg/day, including nicotinic acid, nicotinamide and inositol hexanicotinate. The term niacin (vitamin B3) comprises the two main water-soluble forms nicotinic acid and nicotinamide (niacinamide). The human body can get niacin from the diet or synthesise it from the essential amino acid tryptophan. Dietary intakes are expressed as milligram niacin equivalents (NEs), which correspond to 1 mg of pure niacin or 60 mg of tryptophan. In the body, niacin primarily functions as a component of the coenzymes NAD (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) and NADP (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) which are present in all cells. These coenzymes play essential roles for the functioning of a wide range of enzymes involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates, amino acids and fat. In addition to its function in coenzymes, niacin is involved in DNA repair and gene stability. Niacin has a half-life of 20-40 minutes in the human body. Late symptoms of severe niacin deficiency (pellagra) include fatigue, headache, apathy, depression, memory loss, dementia, pigmented skin rash after sun exposure, bright red tongue, vomiting, diarrhoea, and constipation. Flushing (burning and itching of the face, arms and chest) and stomach irritation are the main side effects of moderately high supplemental intake of nicotinic acid (>35 mg/day). Long-term use of high doses (≥3000 mg/day) of nicotinic acid as a cholesterol-lowering drug can also be toxic to the liver. Nicotinamide, however, does not have these effects. In general, the risk of nicotinamide toxicity appears to be quite low. VKM proposes to adopt the ULs of nicotinic acid and nicotinamide set by the Scientific Committee for Food Safety (SCF) in 2002, which are based on one human dose-response study (nicotinic acid) and several human dose-response studies (nicotinamide), respectively. Hence, the UL for supplemental nicotinic acid is suggested to 10 mg/day for adults and the UL for supplemental nicotinamide to 900 mg/day for adults. The ULs for children and adolescents have been derived on the basis of their body weights. The ULs set for nicotinic acid and nicotinamide concern only intake from supplements since intake of nicotinic acid and nicotinamide from regular foods is considered to be without risk of negative health effects. Therefore, VKM has not conducted or evaluated scenarios with intake from both diet and the separated new maximum limits for nicotinic acid and nicotinamide in food supplements suggested by NFSA. Dietary calculations, however, have been performed for niacin intakes (includes both nicotinic acid and nicotinamide) in various percentiles (P5, P25, mean, P50, P75 and P95) in children (2-, 4- and 9-year-olds), adolescents (13-year-olds) and adults as background information. Mean and median intakes of niacin from the diet alone are above or at the recommended intakes for all age groups. Because UL for supplemental nicotinic acid is 10 mg/day for adults, none of the suggested maximum limits in food supplements (1, 4, 8, or 10 mg/day) will lead to exceedance of this UL in adults. In 13-year-olds and 9-year-olds, supplements with 8 mg nicotinic acid per day will lead to exceedance of UL, and in 4-year-olds and 2-year-olds supplementation of 4 mg nicotinic acid per day will lead to exceedance of the UL for nicotinic acid. Because UL for supplemental nicotinamide is 900 mg/day for adults, none of the suggested maximum limits in food supplements (100, 500, 700 or 900 mg/day) will lead to exceedance of UL in adults. In 13-year-olds, supplements with 700 mg nicotinamide per day will lead to exceedance of UL. In 9-year-olds, 4-year-olds and 2-year-olds, supplementation of 500 mg nicotinamide per day will lead to exceedance of the UL for nicotinic acid.

Assessment of Selenium Intake in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Levels

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), evaluated the intake of selenium in the Norwegian population. VKM has also conducted scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of amending maximum limits for selenium to 50, 150 or 200 μg/day in food supplements. The existing maximum limit is 100 μg/day. Selenium is a cofactor for enzymes and proteins with vital importance in antioxidant defence, thyroid hormone and insulin function and regulation of cell growth. We reviewed four risk assessments undertaken by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), Scientific Committee on Food (SCF), Expert Committee on Vitamins and Minerals (EVM), and the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNR). Because of limited evidence from human studies and due to the selection of a high uncertainty factor (UF), we decided to use the tolerable upper intake levels (ULs) set by the SCF (2000) and later adopted by NNR (2012). Early signs of selenium toxicity are a garlic breath and a metallic taste. Severe selenosis results in fast hair loss and brittle nails, as well as other gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, irritability, and rash. Acute selenium intoxication and chronical overexposure may affect the nervous system and result in nerve damage. The SCF established a UL for selenium at 300 μg/day for adults, including pregnant and lactating women. This UL was based on a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 850 μg/day for clinical selenosis applying a UF of 3, and was supported by three studies reporting no adverse effects for selenium intake between about 200 and 500 μg/day. As there were no data to derive specific ULs for children, the SCF (2000) extrapolated the UL from adults to children based on reference body weights. The proposed UL values for children and adolescents ranged from 60 μg/day (1–3 years) to 250 μg selenium/day (15–17 years). According to the scenario estimations in adults, the dietary selenium intake at the 95th percentile and additionally 150 μg selenium from food supplements will be below the UL while 200 μg selenium from food supplements will lead to exceedance of the UL for adults. For 13- and 9-year-olds, supplemental doses of 100 and 50 μg selenium per day, respectively, do not lead to exceedance of the ULs in these age groups. For 2- and 4-year-olds, all the suggested doses in food supplements will lead to exceedance of the ULs.