RESUMEN
Objective To analyze the willingness and influencing factors for usage of pre-exposure prophylaxis(PrEP) among male students who have sex with men (MSM) in universities of Guangxi. Meth-ods 295 MSM students in universities were recruited by Snow-balling methods. Questionnaires were self-administered to collect social demographic information,AIDS related risky sexual behaviors and willingness for usage of PrEP. Logistic regression was employed for univariate and multivariate analysis. Results Of the 295 MSM,58(19.7%)had ever heard PrEP,265(89.8%) said that they would like to use PrEP. Multivari-ate logistic regression analysis showed that those who had found partners through friends ( OR=11.419,95%CI:1.363~95.641), those who would advise his friend to use PrEP ( OR=87.946,95%CI:13.660-566. 222),those who concerned the convenience to gain the medicine ( OR=119.652,95%CI:3.765-3802.184) and those who said that they could take medicine every day ( OR=88.245,95%CI:10.237-760.696) were more likely to accept PrEP. The subjects whose partners would be angry if they stick to use condoms( OR=0.106,95%CI:0.019-0.606),and those who suspected the effectiveness of drugs( OR=0.010,95%CI:0. 001-0.112) were less likely to accept PrEP. Conclusion The acceptability of PrEP is high in university students'MSM. The safety of drugs and the convenience to gain the medicine are the main influencing factors for usage of PrEP.Using of PrEP should be strengthened to the MSM.
RESUMEN
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the methodological quality and reporting quality on Meta-analysis being published in the Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Computerized literature searching was carried out in Wanfang Medical Online to collect articles that Meta-analysis was used in the Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery since it was founded till July, 2014. Manual retrieval was also conducted. Two researchers independently screened for literature and extracted data. Qualities on methodologies or on the processes of reporting and reviewing were evaluated by both AMSTAR and PRISMA scales.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Forty-two papers on meta-analyses were included in this study. Results on the quality of methodology evaluation showed that the lowest and highest scores were 6 and 9 respectively, the median score was 7. Two articles (4.8%) were rated as high, 40 articles (95.2%) as moderate and 0 articles (0%) as low. Although the quality of methodology was above the average, however, there were still some problems seen in some papers as the conflict of interest was not stated, the list of studies (included and excluded) was not provided, a comprehensive literature search was not performed, the likelihood of publication bias was not assessed, etc. Results on the quality of reporting evaluation showed that the lowest and highest scores were 14 and 22 respectively, the average score was 18.43 ± 2.03, 3 articles (7.1%) scored less than 15 points, 35 articles (83.3%) scored 15.5-21 points, and 4 articles (9.6%) scored 21.5-27 points. The included reviews had high quality on the titles of the report, inclusion criteria, rationale of introduction, synthesis of results, results of individual. However, the abstract, objectives of introduction, scheme and registered, inclusion criteria, research screening, additional analysis, conclusion limitations, funding support etc. were lack of comprehensive reports.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Articles on Meta-analysis published in the Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery are of high quality. The Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery can provide better evidence for clinical decision to gastrointestinal surgeons. However, both of qualities on methodology and reports sill call for continuous improvement.</p>
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Metaanálisis como Asunto , EdiciónRESUMEN
Objective To study the related literature information of the core journal, Chinese Journal of Trauma, in 2003-2007 and evaluate its academic quality. Methods Analysis on literature information and quality evaluation were performed based on the A total of 1 708 related papers were selected from 60 issues of the journal from 2003 to 2007 to evaluate the quality of the journal in seven aspects. Re-suits (1) Average publication capacity index was 0.38 in five years. (2) The major sources of the au-thors were from medical universities or their affiliated hospitals and provincial or military medical units. (3) The major types of the papers were scientific researches, original articles and experience exchange (71.0%). (4) There were 326 grant-based projects, accounting for 35.9% of scientific researches and o-riginal articles. (5) There were average 10.2 quotations in each paper, including 72.2% of foreign docu-mentation, 27.8% Chinese documentation and 6.4% serf-citation. (6) Of all, 684 (75.3%) scientific researches and original articles applied statistical analysis. (7) Of all, 756 (87.4%) scientific researches and original articles were issued with English abstracts. Conclusion Chinese Journal of Trauma has the superiority in above seven aspects, which confirms its quality as a core journal.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE To study the quality of the related articles published in a core biomedical journal Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology in the latest five years. METHODS Statistical analysis and quality evaluation were performed based on the 2 612 related papers which selected from its 48 issues published during the period from 2000 to 2004. RESULTS(1) Five year average publication capacity index was 0.57.(2) The majority authors were from medical universities or their affiliated hospitals and provincial or military medical units.(3) The majority types of the papers were scientific research articles,theses and reviews.(4) There were 160 grant based projects.(5) The average quotations were 6.0 in each paper,among them: 68.6% were Chinese literature,31.4% were from foreign sources,while 34.2% were self-citation.(6) The average issues time lag was 273.5 days in the latest five years. CONCLUSIONS Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology has the superiority in the above aspects,which confirmed its quality as a core journal.