Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2013; 6 (2): 108-114
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-142707

RESUMEN

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of extended spectrum of beta lactamases [ESBLs], to compare different phenotypic methods for ESBL confirmation and to evaluate the antibiotic resistance patterns among ESBL-producing urinary Escherichia coli. Urinary E. coli isolates that were resistant to at least one of the three indicator cephalosporins [cefotaxime, cefpodoxime and ceftazidime] were tested for ESBL production using the double disc synergy test [DDST], the inhibitory potentiated disc diffusion [IPDD] test and the quantitative E-strip method. Of the 163 E. coli strains isolated, 80 [49%] were resistant to at least one of the three cephalosporins, and 38 [47.5%] tested positive for ESBLs by the IPDD test and the E-strip test. However, only15 [18.7%] strains tested positive by the DDST. Among the third-generation cephalosporins, cefpodoxime [46.1%] was the best screening indicator, followed by ceftazidime [43%] and cefotaxime [39.9%]. Most of the ESBL producers [97.3%] were resistant to three or more drugs, compared with 51.2% of non-ESBL producers. Compared with the DDST, the IPDD and E-strip tests appear to be preferable methods for detecting ESBLs, with better sensitivity [100%] and specificilty [97.6%] and positive predictive values [97.3%]. ESBL producers showed significantly [p < 0.05] higher resistance to tobramycin, co-amoxyclav and amikacin than did non-ESBL producers


Asunto(s)
Humanos , beta-Lactamasas/biosíntesis , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Resistencia a las Cefalosporinas , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Fenotipo , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA