Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | IMSEAR | ID: sea-63703

RESUMEN

We report a 25-year-old woman who presented with features of peritonitis. At laparotomy, the cause of the pyoperitoneum was found to be a left-sided ilio-psoas abscess. This was drained, but the patient continued to deteriorate with sepsis, and died on the fourth post-operative day.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , Peritonitis/etiología , Absceso del Psoas/complicaciones , Rotura Espontánea , Sepsis/etiología
2.
Artículo en Inglés | IMSEAR | ID: sea-64613

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal mass may be treated in several ways. However, no randomized trial has been conducted to find the best option. OBJECTIVE: To compare the three most commonly used methods for treating appendiceal mass. METHODS: Over a three-year period, 60 consecutive patients with appendiceal mass were randomly allocated to three groups: Group A--initial conservative treatment followed by interval appendectomy six weeks later; Group B--appendectomy as soon as appendiceal mass resolved using conservative means; Group C--conservative treatment alone. Short-term outcome measures included operative time, operative difficulty, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and duration of time away from work. Long-term outcome measures were: number of hospital visits made, presence of severe incisional pain, scar appearance, and patients with recurrent appendicitis. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable in the three groups. In patients in Group A, operative time was less, adhesions were encountered less frequently, the incision had to be extended less often and post-operative complications were fewer, as compared to Group B. Patients in Group C had the shortest hospital stay and duration of work-days lost; only 2 of 20 patients in this group developed recurrent appendicitis during a follow-up period of 24-52 (median 33.5) months. CONCLUSION: Of the three treatment modalities compared, conservative treatment without subsequent appendectomy appears to be the best.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Análisis de Varianza , Antibacterianos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apéndice/patología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA