Changes in Human Gene Expression After Sleep Deprivation

Objectives@#Sleep is fundamental to maintaining homeostatic control and has behavioral and psychological effects on humans. To better understand the function and pathophysiology of sleep, specific gene expressions in reference to sleep deprivation have been studied. In this study, we investigated the gene expression of peripheral blood mononuclear cells after sleep deprivation to better understand the functional consequence of sleep. @*Methods@#In eight healthy men, 24 h sleep deprivation was induced. Blood was sampled at 14:00, before and after sleep deprivation.mRNA was isolated and analyzed via microarrays. cDNAs before and after sleep deprivation were coupled to Cy3 or Cy5, respectively, and normalized cDNAs were selected with a ratio greater than two as a significant gene. Results are expressed as mean. @*Results@#Among 41174 transcripts, 38852 genes were selected as reliable, and only a small minority (< 1%) of the genes were up-or down-regulated. Total six and eleven genes were selected as significant upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O was most upregulated (6.9-fold), and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5-like protein showed the most substantial inhibition (0.06-fold). @*Conclusions@#This study showed significant associations between sleep deprivation and the immune system. Acute sleep deprivation affects pathways in proinflammatory cytokines as well as metabolic pathways of glutamate and purine, neurotransmitters related to sleep and wake cycle.

Analysis of Polycheck Allergy Results of the Recent Two Years: Comparison with Skin Prick Test and ImmunoCAP

BACKGROUND: Multiple Antigen Simultaneous Test (MAST)-immunoblot assay is a practical and economical test, which has been recently introduced nationwide. Authors investigated test efficiency of a MAST-immunoblot assay, Polycheck Allergy (PA). METHODS: A total of 3,153 patients were tested by PA and the results were compared with the results of ImmunoCAP and skin prick test (SPT) in 532 and 75 patients, respectively. The correlation with the lgE results measured by VIDAS was also analyzed. RESULTS: The agreements of PA with SPT were 87.8% in the Inhalant Panel and 89.3% in the Food Panel and the agreement of ImmunoCAP with SPT was 95.2%. The most common allergens giving positive reactions were Dermatophagoides farinae (46.2%) and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (40.0%). SPT taken as a reference, PA compared with ImmunoCAP showed higher agreement (D. farinae, 76.0 vs. 70.7%; D. pteronyssinus, 76.0 vs. 74.4%), sensitivity (D. farinae, 72.7 vs. 68.2%; D. pteronyssinus, 75.0 vs. 71.2%) and specificity (D. farinae, 85.0 vs. 81.3%) except for the specificity for D. pteronyssinus (78.3 vs. 87.5%). The rate of allergen specific IgE positive patients was higher than that of negative patients when total IgE was over 100 kU/L. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the agreement, sensitivity and specificity of PA were similar to or better than those of the previously established test, ImmunoCAP. The allergen specific IgE results of PA were in correlation with total IgE. PA may be used for testing allergen specific IgE to diagnose and treat allergic diseases.

Analysis of Polycheck Allergy Results of the Recent Two Years: Comparison with Skin Prick Test and ImmunoCAP

BACKGROUND: Multiple Antigen Simultaneous Test (MAST)-immunoblot assay is a practical and economical test, which has been recently introduced nationwide. Authors investigated test efficiency of a MAST-immunoblot assay, Polycheck Allergy (PA). METHODS: A total of 3,153 patients were tested by PA and the results were compared with the results of ImmunoCAP and skin prick test (SPT) in 532 and 75 patients, respectively. The correlation with the lgE results measured by VIDAS was also analyzed. RESULTS: The agreements of PA with SPT were 87.8% in the Inhalant Panel and 89.3% in the Food Panel and the agreement of ImmunoCAP with SPT was 95.2%. The most common allergens giving positive reactions were Dermatophagoides farinae (46.2%) and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (40.0%). SPT taken as a reference, PA compared with ImmunoCAP showed higher agreement (D. farinae, 76.0 vs. 70.7%; D. pteronyssinus, 76.0 vs. 74.4%), sensitivity (D. farinae, 72.7 vs. 68.2%; D. pteronyssinus, 75.0 vs. 71.2%) and specificity (D. farinae, 85.0 vs. 81.3%) except for the specificity for D. pteronyssinus (78.3 vs. 87.5%). The rate of allergen specific IgE positive patients was higher than that of negative patients when total IgE was over 100 kU/L. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the agreement, sensitivity and specificity of PA were similar to or better than those of the previously established test, ImmunoCAP. The allergen specific IgE results of PA were in correlation with total IgE. PA may be used for testing allergen specific IgE to diagnose and treat allergic diseases.