RESUMEN
Objective:To analyse the evaluation and experience of clinical effect of minimally invasive drainage and craniotomy in the treatment of patient with epidural hematoa.Methods:100 cases of patients who were diagnosed as epidural hematoma from January 2015 to January 2016 were selected and randomly divided into two groups,where the control group were given craniotomy,and the observation group were given minimal invasive drainage.The effect of the surgery and the life qualities before and after treatment of the two groups were compared.Results:The effect of observation group is better than that of control group (P ＜ 0.05);craniocerebral defect and the re-hemorrhage incidence occurrence in the observation group were obviously lower than those in the control group,(0 ％,6 ％ vs 12 ％,20 ％) (P＜0.05).Conclusion:Compared with craniotomy,minimal invasive drainage in clinical treatment of epidural hematoma showed advantage in at smaller trauma,faster recovery,and better effect,thus deserving further promotion of clinic application.