RESUMEN
Objective:To analyzed effect of stratified positive psychological intervention based on Self-reporting Inventory (SCL-90) in patients with digestive tract tumors.Methods:Totally 78 patients with digestive tract cancer from January 2019 to February 2020 were divided into observation group (78 cases) and control group (76 cases), the control group given disease knowledge education, psychological intervention, diet and exercise management, and complication prevention etc routine nursing intervention, the observation group combined with stratified positive psychological intervention based on SCL-90 assessment strategy. Cancer-related fatigue, hope level and nurse satisfaction were compared between two groups.Results:6 months after intervention, the observation group cognitive fatigue, mental fatigue, physical fatigue, the influence of fatigue on life, cancer-related fatigue score were respectively (7.24±1.21), (7.58±1.16), (5.16±1.24), (7.65±1.42), (27.63±4.32) points. The control group were respectively (8.35±1.32), (8.02±1.12), (5.87±1.16), (8.72±1.56), (30.96±4.56) points. There were statistically significant of difference between the two groups ( t values were 2.265-5.442, P<0.05 or 0.01). Observation group Grade Ⅲ cancer-related fatigue total score were respectively (27.34±4.32), (27.65±4.25), (27.63±4.41) points, and the control group were respectively (29.56±5.12), (30.23±4.35), (40.77±5.45) points. There were statistically significant of difference between the two groups ( t values were 8.528, 2.163, 5.812, P<0.05 or 0.01). Observation group attitudes towards reality and the future, maintain close relationships with others, adopt positive action, hope level total score were respectively (10.35±2.01), (9.87±1.43), (10.16±1.42), (30.28±5.20) points, and control group were respectively (9.12±1.45), (9.15±1.32), (9.24±1.36), (27.51±4.36) points. There were statistically significant of difference between the two groups ( t values were 3.245-4.104, P<0.05 or 0.01). Observation group second and third grade hope level total score were respectively (30.24±5.20), (31.87±5.45) points, control group were respectively (27.24±4.23), (19.41±3.52) points. There were statistically significant of difference between the two groups ( t values were 2.271, 5.644, P<0.05 or 0.01). 6 months after intervention, The observation group nurse satisfaction 94.87% (74/78) higher than that control group 82.89% (63/76) ( χ2 value was 5.623, P=0.021) . Conclusion:Stratified positive psychological intervention based on SCL-90 assessment strategy help to ensure the balance of the intervention effect, alleviate cancer-related fatigue, Promote development of hope levels, and improve nurse satisfaction.
RESUMEN
Objective To explore the pain beliefs and perceptions held by patients with digestive system cancer.Methods 10 patients with digestive system cancer were interviewed for exploration of their pain beliefs and perceptions.The data were collected using in-depth interview and analyzed with category approach.Results The beliefs and perceptions held by patients with digestive system cancer were presented as:negative pain beliefs,negative emotional perceptions,view social support as important resources.Conclusions The pain beliefs and perceptions in digestive system cancer pain patients are negative.Clinical medical workers should pay attention to the role of beliefs in pain management,and help patients build positive pain beliefs through utilizing social support resources effectively.
RESUMEN
Objective To understand true feelings of patients with malignant tumor after implementing the protective medical treatment.In order to provide more humanized service for clinical nursing and to improve the job satisfaction of nurses.Methods The phenomenological methods of qualitative research was applied to carry out interviews with 12 patients to collected data.Then the data were analyzed.Results After reading,analysis,reflection,classification and refining the theme,we drew the following themes:(1)Before knowing diagnosis:half-believe and anxiety.(2) At the time of knowing diagnosis:luck,avoidance,acceptance and facing; (3) After knowing diagnosis:thirsting for information,low self-worth,improving self motivation.Conclusions We should not insist on hiding malignant tumor patients.Individualized and targeted measures should be taken to make patients cope with diagnosis better and improve the quality of their life.