Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) program in private hospitals in the Philippines: Its acceptability, barriers, and enablers

Background@#Antimicrobials are drugs that are often misused and inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing often results in poor clinical outcome and drug resistance. Monitoring and regulation of antimicrobial use is currently being done by the Department of Health through the Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Program. There is a need to determine the factors that affect successful implementation of an AMS program in private hospitals in the Philippines. This study was conducted to identify the enablers and potential barriers in implementing an AMS program in nine (9) private hospitals. @*Methodology@#A concurrent mixed methods design was used to assess various stakeholders’ (physicians, administrators, other AMS members) perceptions of existing or proposed AMS programs, and to identify barriers and enablers in their implementation. Quantitative data were collected using self-administered survey questionnaire to assess clinician’s acceptance of AMS programs. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured one-on-one interviews of clinicians and other AMS personnel and focus group discussions (FGD) of selected clinician groups. Data were gathered from October 2018 to October 2019. @*Results@#409 clinicians were surveyed, 52 were interviewed and 46 sat for 13 sessions of FGDs. Overall, the survey established that physicians were well aware of antimicrobial resistance problem. Majority of the clinicians indicated general agreement with the currently practiced antimicrobial protocols in their hospitals and with the AMS program. However, there were disagreements in perceptions with how antimicrobial restrictions impair prescribing practices and overuse of the same. These responses were strong points of discussion during the Key Informant Interviews (KII) and FGDs. All respondents were amenable with the institutionalization of an AMS program in their hospitals. The hospital leadership’s commitment was determined to be the key enabler of a successful AMS program’s implementation. Barriers identified for hospitals with existing AMS programs were: lack of dedicated staff, resistance and/or non-cooperation of physicians, lack of support from non-medical departments, and inadequate cooperation between hospital personnel. Barriers identified, regardless of the status of the AMS programs were: deficiency in knowledge with developing and implementing an AMS program, inadequate information dissemination, unavailability of an IT-based monitoring for antibiotic use, and the influence of pharmaceutical companies on stakeholders with regards to antimicrobial use. @*Conclusion@#Similar enablers and barriers to a successful implementation of an AMS program were seen in the different hospitals. A hospital leadership’s commitment was determined to be the key enabler. The success or failure of any AMS program appears to depend on physician understanding, commitment and support for such a program. By involving the main players in an AMS program- the hospital administrators, clinicians and other key members, perceived barriers will be better identified and overcome, and enablers will help allow a successful implementation of an AMS program. This multi-center study was funded by Philippine Council on Health Research and Development ( PCHRD) and Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines ( PIDSP) and was conducted by the PIDSP Research Committee.

A retrospective study of the prevalence and sensitivity pattern of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Chong Hua Hospital, Cebu City, 2007-2010

Background/Objective@#There is a deep concern about the rapid rise in resistance of bacteria to antimicrobial agents. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) which pose challenges to the medical community. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and sensitivity pattern of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in a tertiary hospital in Cebu City from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010. @*Methods@#Charts of patients with MRSA growths were reviewed upon their admission. The sensitivity pattern, demographic profile and risk factors were noted. @*Results@#Out of the 637 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA had a prevalence rate of 38.6% (n=246), while Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) had 61.4% (n=391). The prevalence rate of health-care associated MRSA was 2% (n=5). The majority of the specimens sent for culture were wound/abscess (70% of pediatric and 76% of adult patients isolates). All MRSA growths were resistant to penicillin G, ampicillin, oxacillin, cefuroxime and amikacin. Local MRSA strains were still susceptible to ciprofloxacin (82.3%), clindamycin (90.6%), erythromycin (91.5%), and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (85.9%). There was no resistance to linezolid and vancomycin. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was not isolated. The mortality rate on both pediatric and adult population was 2.1% and 4.8%, respectively. @*Conclusion@#The prevalence of MRSA is increasing. Clindamycin, erythromycin, sulfamethoxazole- trimethoprim and vancomycin are excellent treatment options treat MRSA.