RESUMEN
Background and Objectives@#A lack of investigators for polysomnography has risen due to increased demand since health insurance started to cover the cost of the test. We examined the reliability of the automated scoring of polysomnography, which has been deployed to improve this imbalance.Subjects and Method We analyzed the data of 20 patients who underwent level 1 polysomnography from April 1 to July 27, 2019. The software from Noxturnal (Nox Medical) was used for the scoring of the Polysomnography data. Each of the polysomnographic data was scored both by the automated scoring system and by a skilled technician. @*Results@#Twenty patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference between automated scoring and manual scoring in sleep latency, apnea index, and rapid eye movement sleep stage ratio. However, the concordance rate of the sleep stage by epoch was 83.32%, and there was a significant difference with regards to apnea-hypoapnea index (AHI) and respiratory disturbance index (RDI). Two obvious errors were noted in the automated scoring that could be easily fixed; the failure to recognize wakefulness during sleep and the fragmentation of respiratory events. When two errors were corrected, many differences in polysomnography parameters, including AHI and RDI, were eliminated. @*Conclusion@#It showed 80% coincidence of epoch in the sleep stage between the automated scoring and manual scoring. However, there was no difference in AHI and RDI when the fragmented respiratory events of the automated scoring were adjusted. Therefore, automated scoring is considered to be useful if only a little modification could be made.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the endoscopic exclusive transcanalar approach for the management of conductive hearing loss. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: This was a retrospective comparative study of 106 patients who underwent exploratory tympanotomy at Chonnam National University Hospital from January 2008 to March 2016. The subjects were classified into two groups; endoscopic tympanotomy (ET, n=26) and microscopic tympanotomy (MT, n=80). Demographic data, operation time, postoperative admission days, pure tone audiometric results of pre-operation and post-operation at 3 months, and hearing success rate were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean operation time of MT (101.7±24.8 minutes) was longer than that of ET (59.8±23.2 minutes) with a statistical significance (p<0.01). The mean postoperative admission days of MT (4.4±1.3) was longer than that of ET (2.0±0.6) with a statistical significance (p<0.01). Hearing gain (air-conduction) and air-bone gap improvements were not significantly different between the groups. However, the hearing success rate of ET [partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP) 85.7%, total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) 81.8%] was significantly improved enormously compared to that of MT (PORP 62.9%, TORP 64.3%). CONCLUSION: With regards to conductive hearing loss, the endoscopic approach provided a better surgical view and less invasiveness compared with the microscopic approach. In conclusion, endoscopic exploratory tympanotomy had several advantages in operation time, admission days and hearing success rate.
RESUMEN
We report a case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) otorrhea with impression material of hearing aid in the middle ear. The patient had chronic otitis media in the right ear with sensorineural hearing loss in both ears. The silicone flowed into the middle ear through a tympanic membrane perforation during the process of making an ear mold. Several days after hearing aid fitting, the patient had severe otalgia, intractable otorrhea, aggravated hearing loss, and dizziness. The pus culture and sensitivity test revealed MRSA. After topical treatment using diluted vinegar irrigation and ototopical vancomycin solution, intractable otorrhea was controlled. The infected silicone impression was removed by canal wall-up mastoidectomy, and hearing was saved. We present here a review of the literature regarding silicone impression in the middle ear after hearing aid mold fitting.