Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
1.
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science ; : 13-18, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-782214

RESUMEN

14 cm, and HOB >7.8 cm were 10.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57–74.94), 5.26 (95% CI, 1.06–26.19), and 10.50 (95% CI, 1.03–107.12), respectively. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for AFI, HOB, and parity were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54–0.78), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64–0.85), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62–0.76), respectively. HOB had the largest AUC, but there were no significant differences among the AUCs of other factors. The cut-off value of HOB was 6 cm.CONCLUSION: This study showed that the AUC of HOB was greater than that of parity and AFI, although it was not statistically significant. As HOB is a noninvasive and comprehensive marker to predict successful ECV, consideration of HOB would be helpful before conducting ECV. Further studies are needed.


Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Líquido Amniótico , Área Bajo la Curva , Presentación de Nalgas , Nalgas , Oportunidad Relativa , Paridad , Mujeres Embarazadas , Estudios Prospectivos , Sínfisis Pubiana , Ultrasonografía , Versión Fetal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA