Induced abortion and concurrent adoption of contraception in the rural areas of India (an ICMR task force study).

BACKGROUND: Despite a liberal Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) act and awareness of family planning, maternal mortality attributable to induced abortion is high. AIMS: Assess attitude, behavior, practices and utilization of services by rural women for induced abortion and concurrent acceptance of contraception. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Cross sectional survey of eligible married women in 13 states in India over one year. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1851 women who had an induced abortion during the previous 3 years were interviewed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Includes proportions, rates and chi-square test. RESULTS: The main reason for seeking abortion was "don't need any more children" (42%), and in 12.4 per cent they specifically mentioned that they "don't need any more daughters". Around 46% of women accessed abortion services from private clinics as compared to government hospital (37.1%) and Primary Health Centre/Community Health Centre (14.0%). The decision to terminate the pregnancy and place of abortion was made by the husband in 42.8% and 52.5% respectively. Regret for abortion was expressed by 29.6% of the women. However, only 7.2% said they would not advice others for induced abortion. Nearly one half of the women undergoing abortion accepted a family planning method concurrently; of these Intra Uterine Device/oral contraceptives and a permanent method was adopted by 37.2% and 49.1% respectively. Acceptance of vasectomy by male partner was found to be low (1.3%). "Husband objected" (32.3%) was the main reason for not accepting post abortal contraception. Majority of the acceptors said they would recommend to others the same place where they had undergone abortion, thus indicating their satisfaction with the source and services received. CONCLUSIONS: Counselling for post-abortal contraceptive should be provided to the couple so that they can make an informed choice.

Contraceptive knowledge, practices and utilization of services in the rural areas of India (an ICMR task force study).

To obtain information from rural women regarding their contraceptive knowledge, practices and utilization of services, a cross-sectional survey of 117,465 eligible women was carried out in the sampled areas of 28 districts from January 1996 to February 1997. From among the current contraceptive users all of IUD, OC and acceptors of a permanent method in the last one-year (14,276) were interviewed in detailed. In addition a systematically selected sample of 17,082 non users were also interviewed. Overall contraceptive prevalence was 45.2% of which 34.2% had used a permanent method. Among the current users, the contraceptive had been availed mainly from either PHC (31.5%) or hospital (42.1%). Around half the women (53.1%) had received counseling and in 20.3% information regarding other methods. Pelvic examination was done in 39.1% Most of the women (>97%) expressed satisfaction with the method, provider and services. Almost all the women (98.8%) were using a contraceptive method with the knowledge of their husband and had his support for continuing the same. There was no concept of using any family planning method for either postponing the first conception after marriage or spacing between the two child births. A large majority of women (70.5%) used a family planning method for the first time only after completing their desired family size. Among the never users, 73.5% mentioned at least one modern method of family planning available in the national programme and 64.3% mentioned the service source where it would be available. Fewer women in most of the districts mentioned spacing methods as compared to female sterilization. The main reason given for not using any family planning method was "family not complete" (34.6%). There is need to promote spacing methods by policy makers and field workers and motivate couples to accept them.

Resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns with room air or 100% oxygen at birth: a multicentric clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term efficacy of room air versus 100% oxygen for resuscitation of asphyxic newborns at birth. DESIGN: Multicentric quasi randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Teaching hospitals. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Asphyxiated babies weighing greater than 1000 grams, with heart rate less than 100 per min and/or apnea, unresponsive to nasopharyngeal suction and tactile stimuli and having no lethal abnormalities. INTERVENTION: Asphyxiated neonates born on odd dates were given oxygen and those on even dates room air for resuscitation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: Apgar score at 5 minutes; Secondary: Mortality and Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) during first 7 days of life. RESULTS: A total of 431 asphyxiated babies, 210 in the room air and 221 in 100% oxygen group were enrolled for the study. Both the groups were comparable for maternal, intrapartum and neonatal characteristics. The heart rates in room air and 100% oxygen groups were comparable at 1 minute (94 bpm and 88 bpm), 5 minutes (131 bpm and 131 bpm) and 10 minutes (135 bpm and 136 bpm). Median apgar scores at 5 min [7 versus 7] and 10 minutes [8 versus 8 ], in the room air and oxygen groups respectively, were found to be comparable. Median time to first breath (1.5 versus 1.5 minutes) was similar in the room air and oxygen group. Median time to first cry (2.0 versus 3.0 minutes) and median duration of resuscitation (2.0 versus 3 minutes) were significantly shorter in the room air group. The number of babies with HIE during first seven days of life in the two treatment groups (35.7% babies in room air and 37.1% in the 100% oxygen group) were similar. There was also no statistically significant difference in the overall and asphyxia related mortality in the two treatment groups (12.4% and 10.0% in room air versus 18.1% and 13.6% in oxygen group). CONCLUSION: Room air appears as good as 100% oxygen for resuscitation of asphyxic newborn babies at birth.

Pregnancy outcome in women exposed to toxic gas at Bhopal.

A study was undertaken to compare the effects of exposure to the toxic gas in pregnant women in Bhopal with pregnant women in a similar, unexposed area. A high incidence of spontaneous abortions (24.2%) in the pregnant women exposed to the toxic gas was observed as compared to those in the control area (5.6%). Other indices of adverse reproductive outcome, such as the rate of still birth and congenital malformation were not found to be different. The perinatal and neonatal mortalities were significantly higher in the affected area (6.9 and 6.1% respectively), as compared to the control area (5.0 and 4.5% respectively).