Evaluation of coagulation parameters: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) between survivors and nonsurvivors

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate and compare the coagulation parameters of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with mortal and nonmortal conditions. METHODS: In this study, 511 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were included. Information about 31 deceased and 480 recovered COVID-19 patients was obtained from the hospital information management system and analyzed retrospectively. Whether there was a correlation between coagulation parameters between the mortal and nonmortal patients was analyzed. Descriptive analyses on general characteristics of the study population were performed. Visual (probability plots and histograms) and analytical methods (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test) were used to test the normal distribution. Analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical software package. RESULTS: Out of 511 patients, 219 (42.9%) were females and 292 (57.1%) were males. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females in terms of mortality (p=0.521). In total, the median age was 67 (22). The median age was 74 (13) in the nonsurvivor group and 67 (22) in the survivor group, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.007). The D-dimer, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, neutrophil, and lymphocyte median age values with p-values, in the recovered and deceased patient groups were: 1070 (2129), 1990 (7513) μg FEU/L, p=0.005; 12.6 (2.10), 13.3 (2.1), p=0.014; 1.17 (0.21), 1.22 (0.19), p=0.028; 5.51 (6.15), 8.54 (7.05), p=0.001; and 0.99 (0.96), 0.64 (0.84), p=0.037, respectively, with statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this study, D-dimer, prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio increase were found to be associated with mortality. These parameters need to be closely monitored during the patient follow-up.

Correlation between venous blood gas indices and radiological involvements of COVID-19 patients at first admission to emergency department

SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to investigate the relation between venous blood gas and chest computerized tomography findings and the clinical conditions of COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: A total of 309 patients admitted to the emergency department and subsequently confirmed COVID-19 cases was examined. Patients with pneumonia symptoms, chest computerized tomography scan, venous blood gas findings, and confirmed COVID-19 on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were consecutively enrolled. Multiple linear regression was used to predict computerized tomography and blood gas findings by clinical/laboratory data. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 51 (interquartile range 39-66), and 51.5% were male. The mortality rate at the end of follow-up was 18.8%. With respect to survival status of patients pCO2 and HCO3 levels and total computerized tomography score values were found to be higher in the surviving patients (p<0.001 and p=0.003, respectively), whereas pH and lactate levels were higher in patients who died (p=0.022 and p=0.001, respectively). With logistic regression analysis, total tomography score was found to be significantly effective on mortality (p<0.001). The diffuse and random involvement of the lungs had a significant effect on mortality (p<0.001, 95%CI 3.853-38.769, OR 12.222 and p=0.027; 95%CI 1.155-11.640, OR 3.667, respectively). With linear regression analysis, the effect of pH and lactate results were found to have a positive effect on total tomography score (p=0.003 and p<0.001, respectively), whereas pCO2 was found to have a negative effect (p=0.029). CONCLUSION: There was correlation between venous blood gas indices and radiologic scores in COVID-19 patients. Venous blood gas taken in emergency department can be a fast, applicable, minor-invasive, and complementary test in terms of diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia and predicting the prognosis of disease.

The diagnostic process of covid-19 in the emergency department: laboratory and imaging methods

SUMMARY OBJECTIVES The 2019 Novel coronavirus disease puts a serious burden on the health system. Therefore, the detection of particularly serious patients at an early stage is extremely important in terms of controlling the outbreak and improving the prognosis. We investigated the role of inflammatory markers studied in patients suspected of COVID-19 at an emergency department in predicting PCR and CT results. METHODS This retrospective study was carried out with 133 patients who were admitted between 13 March and 1st April 2020 with suspicion of COVID-19. The patients were divided into four groups according to CT and RT-PCR results and evaluated. RESULTS Considering all patients, no specific findings were found in the hematological and biochemical values of patients in the laboratory analyses. Although all of the results remained within the reference range, there was a significant difference in white blood cell, neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte values when the groups were compared [p = 0.000; p = 0.004; p = 0.022; p = 0.023]. CONCLUSION Laboratory is not specific enough in the pre-diagnosis. In addition, this result does not alter with PCR or CT positivity. However, minimal changes observed in laboratory results may be partially guiding in patients in whom both PCR and CT are positive.

RESUMO OBJETIVOS A nova doença de coronavírus de 2019 coloca um fardo sério para o sistema de saúde. Portanto, a detecção de pacientes especialmente graves em um estágio inicial é extremamente importante em termos de controle do surto e melhoria do prognóstico. Investigamos o papel dos marcadores inflamatórios estudados em pacientes suspeitos de COVID-19 no pronto-socorro na previsão de resultados de PCR e CT. MÉTODOS Este estudo retrospectivo foi realizado entre 133 pacientes que foram admitidos entre 13 de março e 1o de abril de 2020 com suspeita de COVID-19. Os pacientes foram divididos em quatro grupos de acordo com os resultados da TC e RT-PCR e avaliados. RESULTADOS Considerando todos os pacientes, não foram encontrados achados específicos nos valores hematológicos e bioquímicos dos pacientes em análises laboratoriais. Embora todos os resultados tenham permanecido dentro do intervalo de referência, houve uma diferença significativa nos valores de glóbulos brancos, neutrófilos, plaquetas e linfócitos quando os grupos foram comparados [p = 0,000; p = 0,004; p = 0,022; p = 0,023]. CONCLUSÃO O laboratório não é suficientemente específico no pré-diagnóstico. Além disso, este resultado não se altera com a positividade para PCR ou CT. No entanto, alterações mínimas observadas nos resultados laboratoriais podem ser parcialmente norteadoras em pacientes com PCR e CT positivos.