Ascites in childhood liver disease.

Ascites is a common clinical problem in children with liver disease. The peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis is mostly accepted as the pathophysiological basis of ascites. The most important complication is spontaneous ascitic fluid infection in the form of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and its variants. Aerobic gram-negative bacteria, primarily Escherichia coli, are the most common isolates. Diagnostic paracentesis is done in patients with ascites when diagnosed first time and at the beginning of each admission to hospital. Ascitic fluid is evaluated for cell count with differential, albumin level, total protein and culture. Serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) is the best single test for classifying ascites into portal hypertensive (SAAG> 1.1 g/dL) and non-portal hypertensive (SAAG < 1.1 g/dL) causes. In patients with tense ascites LVP should be performed. A neutrophil count of > 250 cells/mm3 is highly suggestive of bacterial peritonitis. Intravenous cefotaxime is the empiric antibiotic of choice. Long-term administration of oral norfloxacin 5-7.5 mg/Kg once a day in cirrhotic patients with ascitic fluid protein content of < 1g/dL or prior episode of SBP is recommended for prevention of SBP. Oral dual diuretic therapy of single morning dose of spironolactone along with furosemide in the ratio of 5:2 is recommended. While obtaining satisfactory diuretic response dual diuretic therapy can be changed over to monotherapy with spironolactone. Patients should be on sodium restricted diet. Management of ascites might ultimately require liver transplantation.

Efficacy of tyndalized Lactobacillus acidophilus in acute diarrhea.

OBJECTIVE: A double-blind randomized controlled-trial was done to evaluate the efficacy of tyndalized Lactobacillus acidophilus in acute diarrhea. METHODS: All children from 6 months to 12 years with acute diarrhea were included. Lactobacillus acidophilus/placebo was given to the children for 3 days with ORS and feeds. Intake-output was recorded 4 hourly. Of the 98 children, 48 received lactobacillus and 50 the placebo. RESULTS: ORS consumed, frequency of stools, duration of diarrhea, time for rehydration, hospital stay, weight gain and IVF needed were comparable in the two study groups. There were 4 treatment failures in the lactobacillus group and none in the placebo group (OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.84-0.99). In the rotaviral diarrhea and in those who had diarrhea of less then 60 hours the difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: There is no significant benefit of tyndalized Lactobacillus acidophilus in acute diarrhea.