RESUMEN
Objective: To determine the correlation of non-invasive blood pressure obtained byauscultatory and oscillometric methods, with invasive blood pressure in critically ill children.Methods: We compared invasive with auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures usingpaired t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot in 50 children (age 1-12y) admitted in Pediatric intensive care unit. Results: Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterialpressures of invasive methods significantly correlated with auscultatory and oscillometricmethods (P<0.001). Auscultatory and oscillometric measurements under-estimated systolicarterial pressures [mean (SD) difference 5.4 (12.2) mmHg and 6.3 (14.0) mmHg,respectively; P<0.001] and overestimated diastolic arterial pressures [-4.1 (5.8) mmHg and-3.6 (7.2) mmHg; P<0.001] compared to invasive blood pressure. Conclusion: Mean arterialpressure obtained by NIBP measurement is more closer than systolic or diastolic pressures,when compared with invasive blood pressure measurement.