Efficacy of teriparatide in increasing bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis--an Indian experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is emerging as a leading cause of substantial morbidity in India, particularly in postmenopausal women. Teriparatide (recombinant human parathyroid hormone [1-34]) increases bone formation and improves bone microarchitecture, thereby reducing the risk of fractures. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of teriparatide in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomised, prospective, multicentre, open-label, controlled study was conducted on 82 postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis. Patients were randomly divided into control and teriparatide groups, each group consisting of 41 patients. All the patients were supplemented with 1000 mg of elemental calcium and 500 IU of vitamin D throughout the study period of 180 days. Besides, teriparatide group patients were administered teriparatide 20 microg daily subcutaneously. Lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip BMD, bone mineral content (BMC) and bone area were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and at the end of 6 months of treatment. Bone biomarkers, such as serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) and serum osteocalcin (OC), representing bone formation, and urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD), representing bone resorption were assessed at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: During the study period, 9 patients (11%) were lost to follow-up--6 in control group (7.3%) and 3 in teriparatide group (3.7%). There was an excellent compliance to both oral and injectable medication. The investigational product teriparatide was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events. In addition, there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of adverse events. The percentage of increase in lumbar spine BMD, which is the primary endpoint, was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in teriparatide group compared to that in control group (6.58% vs. 1.06%). Further, teriparatide significantly increased percentage of change in lumbar spine T-score (P < 0.001), BMC (P < 0.001) and bone area (P < 0.028) compared to control group at 6 months. Administration of teriparatide resulted in a significant percentage of increase in all the bone biomarkers in teriparatide group compared to control group patients at 3 and 6 months over baseline, thereby showing that there was a significant increase in bone turnover in teriparatide group of patients. CONCLUSION: These results show that teriparatide is an effective and safe drug in increasing the BMD and therefore, teriparatide provides yet another new therapeutic option for reducing the risk management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women (clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT00500409).

Current diagnostic criteria and their impact on outcome and management.

The 1997 American Diabetes Association (ADA) Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and the Provisional Report of the WHO Consultation focus on a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) that is 126 mg/dl or greater and confirmed on a subsequent day as the preferred criterion for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. This criterion is supported by studies demonstrating that this threshold accurately differentiates between non-diabetic and diabetic populations and is associated with the development of specific diabetic microvascular complications. It corrects for the inequivalence of the FPG and 2- hour post glucose (2hPG) criteria of the previous National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) and WHO diagnostic schemes and recognises that oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) rarely are performed in clinical practice. Although the new and the previous criteria produce similar estimates of the prevalence of diabetes, there may be a considerable degree of reclassification. Preliminary studies suggest that the new criteria favour the diagnosis of diabetes in younger and more obese individuals, whereas the older criteria increase the likelihood of diagnosis in older, leaner individuals.