Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
P. R. health sci. j ; 21(3): 233-235, Sept. 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-334011

RESUMEN

Risk assessment for aneuploidy is an integral part of modern obstetrics. However, patients might choose or reject an amniocentesis, based, not on the risk, but on the screening method used. We examined records of patients referred for evaluation of aneuploidy risk from January 1999 to December 2000. Patients found to have a risk above 1/250 were offered amniocentesis. Out of 555 patients found at risk, 336 (60.5) accepted. Acceptance rate varied depending on risk factor identified: advanced maternal age 178/290 (61.4), abnormal serum screening 107/198 (54), sonographic markers 35/48 (72.9) or a previous child aneuploidy 16/19 (84.2). The risk assessment method used influences significantly the amniocentesis acceptance rate and may affect sensitivity of testing.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Amniocentesis , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Aberraciones Cromosómicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Amniocentesis , Aneuploidia , Edad Materna , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Down/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA