Comparison of the minimally invasive treatments of laparoscopic and endosopic for common bile duct stones after gastrojejunostomy / 北京大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVE@#To explore the feasibility and to compare the merits and demerits of laparoscopic and endoscopic approach in removing common bile duct stones in patients with gastrojejunostomy after gastrectomy.@*METHODS@#Between January 2012 and December 2016, 25 patients with common bile duct stones after gastrojejunostomy received laparoscopic or endoscopic treatment in our centers. They were divided into laparoscopic group and endoscopic group based on treatment approaches for common bile duct stones, including 15 patients in laparoscopic group and 10 in endoscopic group. The clinical characteristics and outcomes between the two groups were retrospectively analyzed.@*RESULTS@#Among the 25 patients with gastrojejunostomy, the method of reconstruction was Billroth II in 21 patients and Roux-en-Y in 4 patients. Six patients received laparoscopic or endoscopic treatment during the acute cholangitis state. Among the laparoscopic group, 5 patients with stones more than 1 cm, 7 patients with multiple stones, while in the endoscopic group, 3 patients with stones more than 1 cm and 4 patients with multiple stones. Fourteen patients in the laparoscopic group with coexisting gallbladder stones, and 6 of their common bile duct stones were successfully removed by transcystic approach without T tube drainage. Stone removals were successful in 4 patients of the endoscopic group by a single performance, including 3 patients with single small stone and one patient with multiple small stones. Two patients in the laparoscopic group were converted to open surgery for severe adhesion and one patient in the endoscopic group turned to laparoscopic operation for failing of finding papilla in the Roux-en-Y anastomotic status. The median hospital stays were 12 d and 10 d, respectively in the laparoscopic and endoscopic group. There were 3 patients with postoperative complications, including one patient with paralytic ileus in the laparoscopic group and 2 patients with biliary pancreatitis or bacteremia in the endoscopic group, and all of them recovered uneventfully with conservative treatment.@*CONCLUSION@#Both laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches are feasible for removing stones in the common bile duct in patients with gastrojejunostomy after gastrectomy, and they complement each other. In addition, both techniques are difficult to conduct, and a technical competence should be considered in selection of each method.

Strategies for diagnosis of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis masquerading as gallbladder cancer / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis sometimes exhibit imaging and intraoperative findings that are similar to those of advanced gallbladder cancer, thus these patients are easily misdiagnosed. The present study aimed to investigate the characteristics of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis masquerading as gallbladder cancer that could potentially aid in the correct diagnosis of this condition.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical, serological, radiological and operative features of twelve patients with obviously wall-thickening or mass-forming xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis were retrospectively analyzed. Additionally, the patient preoperative features were compared to those of 36 patients with advanced gallbladder cancers.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Twelve patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis exhibited one to three episodes of acute cholecystitis within 0.5 to 7 months prior to admission to the hospital. Five of these patients exhibited concomitant choledocholithiasis, whereas no concomitant choledocholithiasis was identified in patients with advanced gallbladder cancer. The incidence of abdominal pain (χ(2) = 6.588, P = 0.010), acute cholecystitis (χ(2) = 29.176, P = 0.000), acute cholangitis (χ(2) = 6.349, P = 0.012), choledocholithiasis (χ(2) = 16.744, P = 0.000), carcinoembryonic antigen test (P = 0.007), CA125 (P = 0.001), and diffuse gallbladder wall thickening (χ(2) = 6.031, P = 0.014), continued mucosal line (χ(2) = 15.745, P = 0.000), homogeneous enhancement of mucosal line (χ(2) = 19.947, P = 0.000), submucosal hypoattenuated nodules or band (χ(2) = 18.607, P = 0.000) in computed tomography demonstrated statistically significant differences between cases of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and gallbladder cancer. Furthermore, all the twelve patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis exhibited at least one positive computed tomography imaging feature aside from past acute cholecystitis episode, and no patient with advanced gallbladder cancer simultaneously exhibited past acute cholecystitis episode and at least one positive computed tomography imaging feature.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The accurate preoperative diagnosis of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis includes an integrated review of past acute cholecystitis episode, choledocholithiasis, and positive computed tomography imaging features. Besides, we present an algorithm for intraoperative diagnosis.</p>