Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences ; (6): 78-84, 2011.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-319829

RESUMEN

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the clinical outcome among three different laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ablations: Q-factor customized ablation (aberration smart ablation, ASA), wave-front guided ablation (WASCA) and ablation under wave-front guiding plus iris recognition system (IR+WASCA).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This prospective study comprised 96 eyes of 96 patients, and they were randomly divided into three groups: 30 patients in ASA group, 32 in WASCA group, and 34 in IR+WASCA group. There were no any statistical differences in spherical equivalent (SE), age, sex, pupil diameter, higher-order aberrations (HOA) among three groups preoperatively. Wave-front analysis was performed before and 1, 3 months after operation.</p><p><b>RESULT</b>All patients got an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) ≥ 0.8 1 and 3 months after operation. The residual SE was in ± 0.50D both at 1 and 3 months after surgery. There was no statistical difference in SE value, HOA, change of HOA, and coma aberration postoperatively among three groups. Horizontal coma (Z3¹) aberration took the majority of coma. HOA, total coma aberrations and spherical aberration increased postoperatively (P = 0.000), but without significant difference between 1 month and 3 months after surgery.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>That three customized LASIK are all effective, safe, accurate and stable; meanwhile WASCA may have better UCVA than the other two groups postoperatively.</p>


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Queratomileusis por Láser In Situ , Métodos , Miopía , Cirugía General , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA