RESUMEN
Objectives: Compare the advantages of ventilated nasal packing with conventional Waseda's nasal packing. Research design: Randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods: In this investigation, a sample size of 80 patients was calculated utilizing a WHO calculator. Patients were isolated into two gatherings utilizing the lottery strategy endotracheal tube and surgical gloves loaded with lace goose were utilized for the manufactured ventilated nasal packs and compared with traditional nasal packs. Nasal obstruction and sleep disturbances were learned at 8 and 24 hours postoperatively utilizing a visual analog scale. Results:Mean nasal obstruction by ventilated intranasal pack was 45.62 ± 6.17, Vaseline sinus pack was 77.67 ± 4.85, statistically significant (p = 0.001) in the two gatherings. The mean sleep disturbances in the two gatherings were 46.32 ± 5.23 and 68.75 ± 2.70, separately, and were statistically significant (p = 0.001) in the two gatherings. Conclusion:Patients with ventilated nasal packs were found to have great resistance to nasal packs because of less nasal obstruction and sleep disturbance.