RESUMEN
Food allergy is defined as reaction to a food which has an immunologic mechanism. Its prevalence is increasing in children globally and is therefore of increasing clinical importance. A useful clinical approach is to distinguish food allergic reactions by the timing of clinical reaction in relation to food exposure and classified as immediate (generally IgE-mediated) and delayed (generally non-IgE-mediated), with the exception of eczema and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease, which, when associated with food allergy may be associated with either mechanism. This review is aimed at providing the clinician with a Singaporean perspective on the clinical approach and management of these disorders.
Asunto(s)
Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Lactancia Materna , Eccema , Diagnóstico , Alergia e Inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Tardía , Diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina E , Sangre , Titulación a Punto Final de Prueba CutáneaRESUMEN
Food allergies and atopic diseases are on the rise worldwide. There have been several published practice guidelines on the primary prevention of these diseases. One aspect of these guidelines is the recommendations on infant nutrition, as food allergen exposure and other nutritional factors may influence allergen sensitization. This article aims to review the current international recommendations on infant diet and weaning practices in the primary allergy prevention of infants. The conclusions drawn are as follows: (1) Breastfeeding is considered the gold standard for infant nutrition, especially since exclusive breastfeeding confers some protection against the development of allergic diseases. However, large cohort studies have not been carried out in Asian populations. (2) Maternal avoidance of allergenic food substances during pregnancy and lactation has not been proven to reduce the risk of allergies and is not recommended as a primary prevention strategy. (3) Hydrolyzed formulas have not been shown to have an advantage over breastfeeding, although they have some protective value against atopic eczema in at risk infants when compared to regular cows milk based infant formula. (4) Soy formula is also not recommended for prevention of atopic diseases. (5) Weaning to semisolids should be undertaken between the ages of 4 to 6 months as weaning before the age of 4 months is associated with increased of allergy symptoms. (6) The age for introduction of certain highly allergenic foods have been arrived at empirically and included in some guidelines. These comprise the initiation of dairy products at 12 months, eggs at 24 months, and peanuts, nuts and fish at 36 months.
Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Embarazo , Arachis , Pueblo Asiatico , Lactancia Materna , Estudios de Cohortes , Productos Lácteos , Dermatitis Atópica , Dieta , Huevos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Hipersensibilidad , Imidazoles , Fórmulas Infantiles , Lactancia , Leche , Nitrocompuestos , Nueces , Óvulo , Prevención Primaria , DesteteRESUMEN
Varicella is a common childhood illness that can result in significant morbidity and mortality. As early as 1995, recommendations for routine varicella vaccination have been published, but have not been universally implemented, with cost of vaccination as a major reason. Though available from 1996, the vaccine has yet to be routinely implemented in Singapore. We set out to assess the economic burden of varicella and the cost-benefit of adding a varicella vaccine to the existing immunization schedule in Singapore. In this study, using data from 1994--1995 the direct cost estimates were based on all levels of medical care; inpatient care, emergency room visits, primary health care and medication. Indirect costs were estimated from the cost of time lost by patients and their families attending to medical needs, as well as loss of productivity due to absenteeism. The cost of a vaccination program targeted at 15-month old infants receiving concomitant measles-mumps-rubella immunization was also assessed. The cost-benefit ratio was then estimated. The total cost of varicella in Singapore was estimated to be US$11.8 million per annum. The loss of productivity accounted for a large proportion of the total cost as a lot of parents took leave when their children were ill. The estimates of total cost represent approximately US$188 per varicella case per year. In comparison, the cost of a vaccination program was found to be US$3.3 million per annum. The cost per case averted was US$104. From a societal point of view, for every dollar invested in a vaccination program, we would save about US$2 dollars.