Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Journal of Dental Medicine-Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2006; 19 (3): 53-58
en Persa | IMEMR | ID: emr-164772

RESUMEN

In recent years, CT scan has become available as an alternative to conventional radiography. To date, the utility of Waters view in detecting midface fractures has been rarely evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of Waters radiography with CT scan in detecting midface fractures. In this tests evaluation study, waters view and CT scan were performed for 42 patients with midface fracture admitted to maxillofacial surgery department of Shariati hospital. All images were observed and interpreted by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist and an oral and maxillofacial surgeon. Sensitivity, specificity and reliability for Waters view in detecting midface fractures were assessed by Cohen's kappa test. Sensitivity and specificity for Waters view in detection of midface fratures by the radiologist were 31.79% and 95.35% and by the surgeon were 29.59% and 93.75% respectively. The highest reliability in CT scan and Waters view [in nasal fractures] by the radiologist was 66.67% and was 58.33% by the surgeon in buttress of zygoma. The highest agreement rate between the radiologist and the surgeon for CT scan was in zygomatic arch [78.95%] and for Waters view was in nasal fracture [62.5%]. Based on the results of this study, the specificity of Waters view is sufficient to diagnose fractures of lateral orbital wall, infraorbital rim, orbital floor, zygomatic arch, frontozygomatic suture, lateral wall of maxillary sinus and Lefort II fracture. The specificity is not sufficient to diagnose fractures of medial orbital wall and anterior, posterior and medial wall of maxillary sinus. Detection of these midface fractures needs other conventional radiographies or CT scan

2.
JDT-Journal of Dentistry Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2005; 2 (1): 29-32
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-71659

RESUMEN

Digital measurement of RVG may improve diagnostic interpretation of radiographs in terms of accuracy, although it has been shown that validity of linear measurements of interproximal bone loss could not be improved by basic digital manipulations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of RadioVisioGraphy [RVG] in the linear measurement of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects. Thirty two radiographs of 56 periodontally diseased teeth exhibiting interproximal intrabony defects were obtained by a standardized RVG technique and Intrabony defect depths were determined by linear measurement analysis of RVG. The following four distances were assessed intrasurgically: the cemento enamel junction [CEJ] to the alveolar crest, the CEJ to the deepest extention of the bony defect [BD], the occlusal plane to the BD and the OP to the AC. Comparison between RVG measures and intrasurgical estimates were performed using paired t-test. The radiographic measurements overestimated interproximal bone loss as compared to the intrasurgical measurements: CEJ-BD measurement by 3.492 [P +/- 3.589 mm and intra-surgically was 6.492 +/- RVG was 6.803<0.000]. No statistically significant difference was seen between CEJ and occlusal references in RVG measurements [P<0.729]. Radiographic assessment by either the CEJ or occlusal references overestimated bone loss as compared to the intrasurgical gold standard


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedades Periodontales/diagnóstico por imagen , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar , Recolección de Datos/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudio Comparativo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA