Comparison of two rapid tests for anti-phenolic glycolipid-I serology in Brazil and Nepal

The diagnosis of leprosy continues to be based on clinical symptoms and early diagnosis and treatment are critical to preventing disability and transmission. Sensitive and specific laboratory tests are not available for diagnosing leprosy. Despite the limited applicability of anti-phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) serology for diagnosis, it has been suggested as an additional tool to classify leprosy patients (LPs) for treatment purposes. Two formats of rapid tests to detect anti-PGL-I antibodies [ML immunochromatography assay (ICA) and ML Flow] were compared in different groups, multibacillary patients, paucibacillary patients, household contacts and healthy controls in Brazil and Nepal. High ML Flow intra-test concordance was observed and low to moderate agreement between the results of ML ICA and ML Flow tests on the serum of LPs was observed. LPs were "seroclassified" according to the results of these tests and the seroclassification was compared to other currently used classification systems: the World Health Organization operational classification, the bacilloscopic index and the Ridley-Jopling classification. When analysing the usefulness of these tests in the operational classification of PB and MB leprosy for treatment and follow-up purposes, the ML Flow test was the best point-of-care test for subjects in Nepal and despite the need for sample dilution, the ML ICA test yielded better performance among Brazilian subjects. Our results identified possible ways to improve the performance of both tests.

Rapid differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae from sputum by polymerase chain reaction.

Differentiation of M tuberculosis and M leprae by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), when acid-fast bacilli (AFB) were present in sputum from patients at Anandaban hospital, was carried out. Thirty sputum samples microscopy positive for AFB were collected and were subjected to culture. Bacterial DNA was extracted and PCR was performed using primers specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae DNA. Twenty samples were from patients with clinical TB and 10 from patients with clinical leprosy. Fifteen of the TB samples were positive in both TB PCR and culture, among the reminders four were TB PCR negative and one was positive for TB PCR. All TB samples were negative for leprosy PCR. Of the leprosy samples, five were TB PCR and culture positive, and negative for leprosy PCR. The remaining five samples were negative for both TB PCR and culture but positive in leprosy PCR. Five often clinical leprosy samples were positive for tuberculosis. This indicates that AFB in the sputum of leprosy patients might be M. tuberculosis or M. leprae. Thus PCR can be used for rapid differentiation of M. tuberculosis and M. leprae present in sputum where AFB microscopy is inconclusive.

Reverse line probe assay for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium leprae.

Mutations in the rpoB gene of 40 biopsy isolates of Mycobacterium leprae were analyzed by reverse hybridization-based line probe assay after PCR, and nine distinct single-nucleotide substitutions were found. Among them, a 3-nucleotide substitution was found in two, and 2-nucleotide substitutions were found in seven isolates. This is a new finding of multiple mutations in a single point of the rpoB gene for rifampicin resistance. This investigation demonstrates that the pattern of mutations in the rpoB gene for rifampicin resistance in Nepal involves more variety.