Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Acta cir. bras ; 32(2): 98-107, Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-837681

RESUMEN

Abstract Purpose: To compare the polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) to Vicryl®, Parietex composite® and Ultrapro® meshes to assess the occurrence of adhesions in the intraperitoneal implantation. Methods: Sixty Wistar rats were allocated into three groups: PP+V, in which all the animals received a polypropylene and a Vicryl® mesh; PP+PC, with the implantation of polypropylene and Parietex composite® meshes and PP+UP, in which there was implantation of polypropylene and Ultrapro®. Macroscopic analysis was performed 28 days later to assess the percentage of mesh area affected by adhesion. Results: in the PP+ V group, the Vicryl® mesh showed lower adhesion formation (p=0.013). In the PP+PC, there were no differences between polypropylene and Parietex composite® (p=0.765). In the PP+UP group, Ultrapro® and polypropylene meshes were equivalent (p=0.198) . Conclusion: All the four meshes led to adhesions, with the Vicryl® mesh showing the least potential for its formation.


Asunto(s)
Animales , Masculino , Ratas , Poliésteres , Poliglactina 910 , Polipropilenos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Adherencias Tisulares/prevención & control , Colágeno , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Prótesis e Implantes , Materiales Biocompatibles , Distribución Aleatoria , Ratas Wistar , Modelos Animales , Pared Abdominal/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA