RESUMEN
When compared to non-bifurcation lesions, percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary bifurcation lesions is technically demanding and has historically been limited by lower procedural success rates and inferior clinical results. Following the development of drug-eluting stents, dramatically better results have been demonstrated. In most of the bifurcation lesions, the provisional technique of implanting a single stent in the main branch (MB) remains the default approach. However, some cases require more complex two-stent techniques which carry the risk of side branch (SB) restenosis. The concept of leaving no permanent implant behind is appealing because of the complexity of bifurcation anatomy with significant size mismatch between proximal and distal MB which may drive rates of in-stent restenosis and the potential impact of MB stenting affecting SB coronary flow dynamics. With the perspective of leaving lower metallic burden, a drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been utilized to treat bifurcations in both the MB and SB. The author gives an overview of the existing state of knowledge and prospects for the future for using DCB to treat bifurcation lesions.
RESUMEN
Tecnologias mais avançadas, drogas melhores e profissionais mais experientes contribuíram para desfechos otimizados das intervenções coronarianas percutâneas complexas. As complicações com impacto significativo na sobrevida do paciente e alto custo para o sistema de saúde não foram totalmente eliminadas pelos procedimentos modernos de intervenções coronarianas percutâneas. Os procedimentos preventivos e a experiência do operador são as únicas formas de se evitarem os efeitos colaterais graves das intervenções coronarianas percutâneas. As dissecções, o fechamento abrupto da artéria, a perfuração coronariana, o non-reflow, a embolia gasosa, a deformação do stent, a embolização do dispositivo e o aprisionamento da ogiva de aterectomia rotacional são algumas das complicações abordadas neste artigo.
More advanced technology, better drugs and more experienced operators have contributed to improved complex percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes. Complications with significant impact on patient survival and healthcare costs have not been completely eliminated by modern percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Professional expertise and consistent preventive procedures are the only ways to avoid severe side effects of percutaneous coronary intervention. Dissections, abrupt arterial closure, coronary perforation, no-reflow, air embolism, stent deformation, device embolization, and rotating atherectomy burr entrapment are some of the periprocedural complications covered in this article.