RESUMEN
Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a global public health challenge, which is also developing in Niger. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in Gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical samples in the biological laboratories of two selected health facilities in Niger. Methodology: Clinical bacterial isolates were randomly collected from two biological laboratories of Zinder National Hospital and Niamey General Reference Hospital. These were multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that have been routinely isolated from pathological samples of patients. Molecular detection of resistance genes was carried out by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification using specific primers. These include plasmid-mediated AmpC beta lactamase genes (blaCITM, blaDHAM, blaFOXM), 'Cefotaxime-Munich' type beta lactamase genes (blaCTX-M-1, blaCTX-M-2, blaCTX-M-9), KPC-type beta lactamase gene (blaKPC), Oxa-type beta lactamase gene (blaOXA-48), SHV-type beta lactamase gene (blaSHV), TEM-type beta lactamase gene (blaTEM), quinolone resistance genes (qnrA, qnrB, qnrS), and sulfonamide resistance genes (sul1, sul2, sul3). Results: A total of 24 strains of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria isolated from different clinical samples were analysed. The distribution of the resistance genes detected is as follows; AmpC blaCITM (n=6; 25.0%), AmpC blaDHAM (n=4; 17.0%), AmpC blaFOXM (n=0), blaCTX-M-1 (n=11; 46.0%), blaCTX-M-2 (n=0), blaCTX-M-9 (n=0), blaKPC (n=0), blaOXA-48 (n=2; 8..0%), blaSHV (n=5; 21.0%), blaTEM (n=0), qnrA (n=0), qnrB (n=5; 21.0%), qnrS (n=17; 71.0%), sul1 (n=22; 92.0%), sul2 (n=12; 50.0%), and sul3 (n=0). All isolates tested had at least two resistance genes. Conclusion: The results of this study provide a better understanding of the resistance situation of clinical isolates in Niger. Therefore, it is more than necessary to intensify the detection on a larger number of samples and on a national scale. This will make it possible to assess the true extent of the phenomenon and consequently guide control strategies through a national multisectoral plan.
RESUMEN
Background: Today, bacterial resistance is a public health challenge throughout the world, and infections caused by resistant bacteria are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health care costs. The objective of this descriptive study is to determine the prevalence and distribution of multi-drug resistant (MDR) clinical bacteria isolates at the National Hospital of Zinder, Niger Republic in 2021. Methodology: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study of in- and out-patients from whose clinical samples' bacteria were isolated at the bacteriology unit of the laboratory. Bacteria were isolated from the clinical samples following standard aerobic cultures and identified using conventional biochemical test schemes. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) was performed by the agar disk diffusion technique, and categorization of the isolates into sensitive, intermediate or resistant was done according to the recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society of Microbiology (CA-SFM) 2020 version 1.2. MDR was defined as resistance to at least one antibiotic in three or more categories, while selected MDR bacteria such as ESBL was identified using double disk synergy test, and MRSA by cefoxitin disk diffusion test. Results: Seventy-seven (6.7%) bacterial species were isolated from 1153 clinical samples processed at the bacteriology unit of the hospital laboratory between June and December 2021, of which 65.0% (50/77) were members of the order Enterobacteriales. Escherichia coli represented 40.3% (40/77) of the isolated bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus 13.0% (10/77) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 11.7% (9/77). The overall prevalence of MDR was 44.2% (34/77), including 61.8% (21/34) ESBL-producing Enterobacteriales (ESBL-E), 26.5% (9/34) multi-resistant P. aeruginosa and 11.7% (4/34) MRSA, with 67.6% (23/34) of the MDR isolates from outpatients. Resistance rates of the Enterobacteriales to ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin and imipenem were 62.0%, 52.0%, 38.0% and 8.0% respectively. Resistance rates of P. aeruginosa were 100.0%, 88.9%, 77.8%, 33.3%, 22.2%, and 22.2% respectively to ceftazidime, ticarcillin, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and amikacin. Resistance rates of S. aureus were 100.0%, 50.0%, 40.0%, 10.0%, 0% and 0% to penicillin G,erythromycin, cefoxitin, tetracycline, fusidic acid, and chloramphenicol respectively. ESBL-E were 47.6%,85.7% and 0% resistant to amikacin, ciprofloxacin and imipenem, and MRSA resistance rates were 75.0%, 75.0%, 50.0% and 0% to erythromycin, tetracycline, gentamicin, and chloramphenicol respectively. Conclusion: This study reports high prevalence of MDR bacteria, mainly ESBL-E, with concerning high resistance to carbapenem. Rational use of antibiotics and implementation of surveillance system for MDR bacteria must be implemented in order to limit the emergence and spread of MDR bacteria in Niger Republic.