Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial

Aim: Although bulk fill composites have been widely used as restorative material, there is no consensus regarding the best clinical protocol in terms of composite technique and adhesive system. Therefore, this clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of bulk fill composites for class I restorations under different protocols. Methods: A randomized clinical trial including 155 class I restorations was conducted using different adhesive systems: conventional technique (phosphoric acid + conventional three-step adhesive system) (Group 1, 2 and 3); or self-etching adhesive system (Groups 4, 5 and 6). Control groups 1 and 4 were restored with conventional composite; groups 2 and 5 with low viscosity bulk fill and conventional composite as occlusal coverage; groups 3 and 6 with high viscosity bulk fill. The FDI criteria was used for clinical evaluation at baseline and after 6 months. Results: All groups showed good clinical performance. At baseline, the adhesive system did not affect postoperative hypersensitivity. After 6 months, group 5 showed a significant reduction in color and translucency; group 6 a reduction in terms of anatomical form and for postoperative sensitivity and an improvement in patient satisfaction (p<0.05). Considering the same restorative technique, the use of the self-etching adhesive system showed a significant decrease in color and translucency (p<0.05). Conclusion: All groups showed favorable clinical performance, and promising results were found for the conventional adhesive system and high viscosity bulk fill protocol

Silorane-based composite as repair material: a six-month randomizedclinical trial / Resina composta à base de silorano como material de reparo: estudo clínico randomizado de seis meses

Objective: This study investigated the clinical performance of a silorane-based composite resin when used for repairing conventional composite restorations. Methods: Defective dimethacrylate-based composite resin restorations were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: Control group - Adper SE Plus + Filtek P60 (3M/ESPE, St. Paul, EUA) and Test Group - P90 Adhesive System + Filtek P90 (3M/ESPE, St. Paul, EUA). All repaired restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at six-month recall. The parameters examined were marginal adaptation, anatomic form, surface roughness, marginal discoloration, post-operative sensitivity and secondary caries. The restorations were classified according to modified USPHS criteria. Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the groups. Results: Of the 100 restorations repaired in this study, 93 were reexamined at baseline and 91 at 6-month recall. Drop-out was about 9%. No statistically significant differences were found between the materials for all clinical criteria, at baseline and at 6-month recall (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were registered (p > 0.05) for each material when compared for all clinical criteria, at baseline and at 6-month recall. The hypothesis tested in this randomized controlled clinical trial was accepted. Conclusion: After the six-month evaluations, silorane-based composite exhibit a similar performance compared to dimethacrylate-based composite when used as repair material.

Objetivo: Investigar o desempenho clínico de uma resina de baixa contração à base de silorano quando utilizada para reparar restaurações convencionais de resina composta. Métodos: Restaurações defeituosas de resina composta à base de dimetacrilato foram aleatoriamente reparadas por um de dois grupos de tratamento: Grupo Controle - Adper SE Plus + Filtek P60 (3M/ESPE, St. Paul, EUA) e Grupo Teste - Sistema adesivo P90 + Filtek P90 (3M/ESPE, St. Paul, EUA). Todas as restaurações reparadas foram avaliadas em baseline e ao longo de 6 meses. Os parâmetros analisados foram a adaptação marginal, forma anatômica, rugosidade superficial, descoloração marginal, sensibilidade pós-operatória e lesões de cárie. As restaurações foram classificadas de acordo com os critérios do Serviço de Saúde Público dos Estados Unidos modificados. Os testes de Mann-Whitney e Wilcoxon foram utilizados para comparar os grupos. Resultados: Das 100 restaurações reparadas neste estudo, 93 foram examinadas uma semana após terem sido reparadas - baseline e 91 após 6 meses. A perda foi de aproximadamente 9%. Nenhuma diferença estatisticamente significativa foi encontrada entre os materiais para todos os critérios clínicos, em baseline e ao longo de 6 meses (p> 0,05). Conclusão: A hipótese testada neste ensaio clínico controlado randomizado foi aceita. Após 6 meses de avaliações, resinas compostas à base de silorano apresentaram desempenho clínico semelhante às resinas compostas à base de dimetacrilato quando utilizadas para reparar restaurações de resina composta à base de dimetacrilato.