RESUMEN
Objective To detect the serum level of 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropanoic acid (CMPF),a significant metabolite offish oil,in subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) in local communities,and to investigate the association of CMPF with fatty acid metabolism.Methods A total of 272 NGT participants from screening for diabetes in Shanghai in 2013 were enrolled.Anthropometric measurements,biochemical evaluation,and questionnaire interview were performed for all the participants.The participants were divided into normal weight group [body mass index (BMI) ≤23.9 kg/m2,n =143] and overweight/obesity group (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2,n =129).The serum CMPF concentrations were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.Results Serum CMPF level in overweight/obesity group was lower than that in normal weight group [96.50 (46.11,169.56) μmol/L vs 153.20 (83.16,282.97) μmol/L,P＜0.05].The serum CMPF level was negatively correlated with BMI (r =-0.256,P＜0.01),triglycerides (r =-0.175,P =0.004),and free fatty acid (r =-0.126,P =0.041) according to bivariate correlation analyses.A multivariate stepwise linear regression analysis showed that the serum CMPF level was independently associated with BMI,triglycerides,free fatty acid,and HbA1C.A logistic regression analysis showed that the CMPF was a protective factor against obesity (OR =0.324,95％ CI 0.158,0.664).Conclusion Serum CMPF level is reduced in overweight/obese subjects.CMPF is beneficial to lipid metabolism.
RESUMEN
OBJECTVE:To investigate the clinical effect and safety of pregabalin combined with gabapentin in the treatment of central pain after cerebral infarction.METHODS:One hundred and fifty patients with central pain after cerebral infarction in our hospital from Jan.2010 to Dec.2015 in our department were randomly divided into group A,B,C,with 50 cases in each group.Group A was given Pregabalin capsule 75 mg,bid combined with Gabapentin capsule 0.1 g,tid;group B was given Pregabalin capsule 75 mg,bid;group C was given Gabapentin capsule 0.1 g,tid;3 groups were treated for 4 weeks.VAS score,NRS score,PSQI and SF-36 score were observed among 3 groups before and after treatment to evaluate clinical efficacies of 3 groups;the occurrence of ADR were recorded in 3 groups.RESULTS:The clinical total response rate of group A,B,C were separately 94.00％,74.00％,70.00％.The clinical total response rate of group A was significantly better than that of group B and C,with statistical significance (P＜0.05).After treatment,VAS score of group A,B,C were separately(3.87 ± 0.74),(5.10 ± 1.26),(5.03 ± 1.23);NRS score were separately (3.91 ± 0.88),(5.29 ± 1.25),(5.37 ± 1.30);VAS score and NRS score of group A were signifi cantly lower than group B,C and before treatment,with statistical significance (P＜0.05);PSQI score of group A,B,C were separately(4.03 ± 0.85),(5.92 ± 1.16),(5.83 ± 1.11);SF-36 score were separately (372.84 ± 73.25),(348.07 ± 60.54),(345.67 ± 59.72);PSQI score and SF-36 score of group A were significantly better than group B,C and before treatment,with statistical sig nificance (P＜0.05).There was no statistical significance in the incidence of ADR among 3 groups (P＞0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Compared with pregabalin and gabapentin alone,pregabalin combined with gabapentin in the treatment of central pain after cerebral infarction can efficiently relieve the perceived pain,improve sleep quality and daily life quality and not increase the risk of ADR;therefore,drug combination plan is recommended for patient with central pain after cerebral infarction,especially with poor effect of two single drug.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the fall efficacy of elderly people in nursing homes and its influencing factors. Methods A total of 174 elderly people in 8 nursing homes in Fujian province were recruited by convenience sampling method. They were investigated with a self-designed questionnaire about the demographic data, the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES) and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Results The mean score of fall efficacy was 7.81±1.15, which revealed a middle level. The score of get dressed and undressed scored 9.04 ±1.42, which was the highest, while the score of using public transport scored 5.80 ±3.21, which was the lowest. Multiple regression analysis showed that the mental health status, degree of self care, age were influencing factors of fall efficacy of elderly people. Conclusions The fall efficacy level of 174 elderly people is at medium level, which is different among fall efficacy with mental health status, degree of self care, age. Individualized interventions should be designed and provided for them.