Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(3): 602-603, May-June 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-755857

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT

Objective : Ureteral stents are widely used in endo-urological procedures. However, ureteral stents can be forgotten and cause serious complications, including fragmentation, migration and urosepsis.

There are few reports about forgotten and fragmented ureteral stents with stone formation. We aimed to present this rare case with successful combined endo-urological management.

.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Cuerpos Extraños/cirugía , Litotricia/métodos , Stents/efectos adversos , Cálculos Ureterales/cirugía , Cistoscopía/métodos , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Tempo Operativo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ureteroscopía/métodos
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(3): 535-541, May-June 2015. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-755876

RESUMEN

ABSTRACTIntroduction:

Penile prostheses are subject to a continuous development and have gained better mechanical reliability and safety during the last decades. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes and satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and semirigid penile prosthesis (SPP) implantation.

Materials and Methods:

From August 2001 to June 2012, 257 men with erectile dysfunction (ED) underwent penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) at our institution. Of the 257 patients, 118 underwent implantation of IPP and 139 underwent SPP implantation. The pre-operative and post-operative erectile status of the patients were assessed by international index of erectile function (IIEF) questionnaire. The satisfaction of patients and partners were evaluated by a telephone interview using the erectile dysfunction inventory of treatment satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire and EDITS partner survey.

Results:

The overall major complication rate was higher in IPP group. PPI led to a significant improvement in IIEF scores in both groups. For IPP and SPP groups the average EDITS scores were 78±11and 57±8, respectively, and that for the partners were 72±10 and 49±7, respectively (p<0.05).

Conclusion:

Although the IPP implantation have better satisfaction rates, the SPP implantation is still a viable treatment option in the surgical treatment of ED because of low cost and high durability with acceptable satisfaction rates.

.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disfunción Eréctil/cirugía , Prótesis de Pene , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantación de Pene/métodos , Disfunción Eréctil/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Diseño de Prótesis , Prótesis de Pene/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Parejas Sexuales , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA