Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2022 Dec; 70(12): 4270-4283
Artículo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-224735

RESUMEN

Purpose: To study the antifungal susceptibility of common corneal pathogenic fungi to antifungal agents in the North Indian population. Methods: Prospective study of the antifungal sensitivity testing (natamycin, amphotericin B, voriconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, micafungin) of fungal isolates from 50 cases of culture positive fungal keratitis by using E test method. Details noted included demographic data, visual acuity, clinical details, grade of keratitis, healing time, and success in medical management. Results: Of 50 patients with fungal keratitis (mean age: 40.28 ± 16.77 years), 12 eyes healed within 3 weeks, 14 had a delayed healing response, and 24 had chronic keratitis. Among the 15 cases of Fusarium isolates, 93.3% were sensitive to natamycin, while 40% to amphotericin B; 66.6% to voriconazole, 13.4% to itraconazole and fluconazole each. 80% of Fusarium cases (n = 12) showed susceptibility to posaconazole. Among Aspergillus flavus isolates, 53.4% (n = 8) were sensitive to natamycin, with only 40% (n = 7) showing sensitivity to amphotericin B and good susceptibility to azoles. MIC against susceptible Fusarium spp. for natamycin was 3–16 ?g/mL, amphotericin B: 1–8 ?g/mL, voriconazole: 0.5–1.5 ?g/ mL, itraconazole: 0.5–12 ?g/mL, posaconazole: 0.094–1.5 ?g/mL. MIC against Aspergillus flavus was natamycin: 8–32 ?g/mL, amphotericin B: 0.5–16 ?g/mL, voriconazole: 0.025–4 ?g/mL, itraconazole: 0.125–8 ?g/mL, posaconazole: 0.047–0.25 ?g/mL; against Aspergillus niger isolates, to natamycin was 6 ?g/mL (n=1), amphotericin B 8–12 ?g/mL (n = 3), voriconazole: 0.125–0.19 ?g/mL (n = 3), itraconazole: 0.38–0.75 ?g/mL, posaconazole: 0.064–0.19 ?g/mL and against Aspergillus fumigatus (n = 1), was natamycin4 ?g/ mL, amphotericin B ? 8 ?g/mL, voriconazole 0.25 ?g/mL, itraconazole 1 ?g/mL, and posaconazole 0.19 ?g/mL. MIC against susceptible Acremonium spp. for natamycin was 1.5–16 ?g/mL, amphotericin B: 0.5–8 ?g/mL, voriconazole: 0.19–3 ?g/mL, itraconazole: 0.125 ?g/mL, posaconazole: 0.125–0.5 ?g/mL and against susceptible Curvularia was natamycin 0.75–4 ?g/mL, amphotericin B 0.5–1 ?g/mL, voriconazole 0.125–0.19 ?g/mL, itraconazole 0.047–0.094 ?g/mL, posaconazole 0.047–0.094 ?g/mL. MIC against Mucor spp.+ Rhizopus spp. (n = 1) was natamycin: 8 ?g/mL, amphotericin B: 0.75 ?g/mL, posaconazole: 1.5 ?g/ mL. MIC against of Alternaria (n = 1) was voriconazole: 0.19 ?g/mL, posaconazole: 0.094 ?g/mL. MIC against Penicillium (n=1) was natamycin: 8 ?g/mL, voriconazole: 0.25 ?g/mL, itraconazole: 0.5 ?g/mL, and Posaconazole: 0.125 ?g/mL. Conclusion: Our observations highlight the variations in susceptibility to antifungal agents. Posaconazole seems to be effective with low MIC against common corneal pathogenic fungal isolates

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA