RESUMEN
Background: Depression was seen to be associated with an increased level of inflammatory biomarkers along with the disturbance in the monoamine neurotransmitter system. Current therapies are mostly focussed on the neurotransmitters imbalance but due to increasing cases of treatment failure there is a need to shift our treatment focus to other potential therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the preventive role of aspirin and metformin in stress induced model of depression in wistar rats.Methods: Fifty four wistar rats were randomly divided into nine groups as normal control, experimental control, aspirin (30 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg), metformin (50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg), two combination groups and imipramine (15 mg/kg). Depression model was created by the induction of chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) for consecutive 28 days. Behavioural assessment was done by evaluating immobility time in forced swim test (FST) and sucrose preference ratio (SPR) in sucrose preference test. The data were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) test using SPSS software. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.Results: The CUMS led to an increase in immobility time and decrease in SPR. Aspirin and Metformin alone and their combinations showed statistically significant response in preventing the immobility time to increase (p<0.001) and SPR to decrease (p<0.001). However the response of Aspirin was comparable with Imipramine but the response of Metformin was not as significant as of Imipramine (p>0.05).Conclusions: Aspirin and metformin might have a potential role in the prevention of depression.
RESUMEN
Background: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease requiring long term treatment. For an effective control of asthma symptoms background knowledge of the prescribing pattern of anti-asthmatic drugs is a must.Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine OPD, King George's Medical University, Lucknow. 114 patients of asthma were recruited for the study. A case report form was filled from patient’s prescription containing the demographic details of the patients, presenting complaints, investigations and drugs prescribed along with their dose, duration, frequency, route of administration.Results: 114 patients’ prescriptions were assessed which showed average number of drugs per prescription - 3.22. 42.8% and 50% of the drugs were prescribed in accordance with World Health Organization model list of essential medicines and National list of essential medicines. Short acting ?2 agonist (salbutamol), 61.4% was the most commonly and frequently prescribed single anti asthmatic drug. Combination of inhaled corticosteroid and long acting ?2 agonist, 86.8% was the most commonly prescribed fixed dose combination anti asthmatic drug. Inhalational route (75%) was the most preferred one over oral route (25%).Conclusions: Asthma being a chronic disease requires prolonged treatment which imposes economic burden on the patients. Judicious prescription of drugs not only improves the patient clinically but also removes the unnecessary burden. Data obtained from these studies can be used as a guide to make future decisions regarding standard prescription.
RESUMEN
Background: There were 4.1% of all new cases and 19% of previously treated patients were diagnosed with either multidrug resistant or rifampicin resistant tuberculosis in 2016. In the state of Uttar Pradesh, there were 2.16 new cases and 44,531 previously treated cases. The objectives of the study were to assess the predisposing factors, causality assessment, severity grading and avoidability of the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of the antitubercular drugs in MDR-TB patients in a tertiary care hospital of northern India.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted for 12 months at a tertiary care hospital. The patients with MDR tuberculosis on treatment with DOTS Plus regimen under RNTCP and who met the inclusion exclusion criteria were recruited after informed consent. ADRs were monitored daily till the patients remained admitted and thereafter monthly. Predisposing factors were recorded. Causality assessment was performed by Naranjo scale and WHO UMC scale, severity by Hartwig’s scale and avoidability by Halla’s scale.Results: There were 115 patients were recruited, 70 developed at least one ADR. 98 ADRs were reported. The commonest ADR reported were – gastrointestinal (38.76%), neurological (21.24%) and hepatobiliary (8.16%). Diabetes and HIV predisposed to development of ADRs. 58.18% ADRs were classified as possible and 37.5% as probable by Naranjo’s scale. 51.02% ADRs were classified as probable and 42.83% as possible by WHO-UMC. 56% were classified as mild, 36% moderate, and 6% severe via Hartwig’s scale. 51 ADRs were classified as avoidable and 40 ADRs were possibly avoidable.Conclusions: Monitoring and assessment of ADRs is necessary to promote awareness, curb resistance and maintain adherence.
RESUMEN
Background: Between 2006 and 2015, the prevalence of MDR-TB has been found to be as high as 39.9% in some states. Approximately 35.8% of all previously treated patients developed MDR-TB. The objective of the present study was to identify demographic and health characteristics of patients as well as incidence and pattern of the adverse drug reactions caused by antitubercular drugs in MDR-TB patients in a tertiary care hospital of northern India.Methods: This 12 months study of observational study was conducted at a DOTS centre. MDR-TB diagnosed patients treated with DOTS Plus regimen were enrolled after getting informed consent. Patient information was recorded. Patient follow-up was conducted to identify the incidence and pattern of ADRs.Results: A total of 115 patients were enrolled. Maximum number of cases were in the 31-40 age group (25.21%) followed by the 41-50 age group (20.86%). 76 (66.08%) were males and 39 (33.91%) were females. 52 patients (45.21%) had concomitant diseases, out of which 15 (13.04%) were HIV positive and 21 (18.26%) were diabetic. 70 patients (60.86%) developed ADRs. The adverse drug reaction that were seen are -38 (38.76%) cases of gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions, 8 (8.16%) jaundice/hepatitis, 7 (7.14%) impaired hearing/vertigo, 21 (21.24%) central nervous system adverse drug reaction, 6 (6.12%) peripheral neuropathy, 6 (6.12%) rash and itching, 5 (5.10%) arthralgia, 3 (3.06%) renal impairment, 2 (2.04%) hypothyroidism and 2 (2.04%) blurred vision.Conclusions: Determining which population groups are affected most by ADRs can help physicians to better monitor and make an early diagnosis to reduce ADR-related morbidity and mortality.
RESUMEN
Background: DPCO (Drugs Prices Control Order) price list is issued by NPPA (National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority) each year to guide the pharmaceuticals companies for controlling the prices in India. Some drugs cost more than the DPCO list. As antihypertensive drugs are taken lifelong once diagnosis is made, price variation and costing above prescribed price cause a huge economic burden on such patients. This study was undertaken to know the number of antihypertensive drugs brands with price above the recommended DPCO price list 2017.Methods: Authors have collected the data from website medguideindia.com, CIMS (current index of medical specialties), Drug Today, and compared the listed antihypertensive drugs of various available brands in India with DPCO price list 2017. Data was entered in Microsoft excel 2010. Percentage of selling price above the DPCO price list was calculated for each drug.Results: The data of 30 formulations of 16 antihypertensive drugs was analysed. The total number of available brands of all formulations was 1365 out of which only 831 (60.88%) brands were found to have price <DPCO recommended list. 534 (39.12%) brands had price more than the recommended limit. The minimum violation of price limit was found in case of metoprolol 25mg (6.66%) and maximum price violation was observed with spironolactone 25mg and sodium nitroprusside inj 10mg/ml.Conclusions: Reassessment and monitoring for implementation of DPCO price list should be done as still large number of brands are not following the regulations and are violating the limit set by NPPA/DPCO.
RESUMEN
Recently, a lot have been written and discussed about animal experiments and ethics. Still there is too much confusion among academicians and researchers about the future of use of animals in biomedical research and up to what extent their use in laboratory, research institutions, and medical colleges. This article highlighted and discussed about various aspects of this burning issue along with several pros and cons.
RESUMEN
The aim was to assess and document the efficacy and tolerability of parflex (FDC of aceclofenac with paracetamol and serratiopeptidase) in management of pain and inflammation in adult patients undergoing surgical procedures (or operations). The design was open, prospective, non-comparative and multi-dose study of patients undergoing surgical procedures at a leading, tertiary-care, teaching hospital (setting) in Lucknow, the name being, King George's Medical College, Lucknow 226003. The patients were 50 adult patients of either sex undergoing surgery. They were given 1 tablet twice daily, taken after meals. Treatment duration was for a total of up to 7 days (intervention). Primary efficacy variables were relief from postoperative pain. Secondary efficacy variables were global assessment of efficacy and toleration by patients and treating physicians. Record was made of spontaneously reported adverse events with their nature, intensity and outcome (tolerability). Out of 50 patients, 31% were (ENT), 36% were (Orthopaedic) and 33% were (Gynaecology). They were enroled in this study. The observations made were mean pain score showed significant improvement with study drug - decreasing from 2.66 at baseline to 1.36 after 48 hours, and to 0.8 at the end of study. Composite score for pain, fever and swelling also showed substantial gains visit-on- visit-decreasing from 3.62 at baseline to 2.04 after 48 hours, and to 0.98 at final visit. None of the patients reported any adverse event. Global efficacy assessment was rated as 'excellent or good' by 54% of patients and in 59% of patients by their treating physicians. To conclude, parflex is an effective analgesic, anti-inflammatory drug that has a valuable therapeutic option for controlling pain and inflammation after surgical procedures.