RESUMEN
Despite major advances in percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], in-stent restenosis [ISR] remains a therapeutic challenge. We sought to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes after treatment with repeat drug-eluting stent [DES] implantation [[DES sandwich] technique] with DES placement in the bare-metal stent [DES-in-BMS] in a [real world] setting. We retrospectively identified and analyzed clinical and angiographic data on 194 patients previously treated with the DES who underwent repeat PCI for ISR with a DES or a BMS. ISR was defined, by visual assessment, as a luminal stenosis greater than 50% within the stent or within 5 mm of its edges. We recorded the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events [MACE], defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and the need for target vessel revascularization [TVR]. Of the 194 study participants, 130 were men [67.0%] and the mean +/- SD of age was 5 7.0 +/- 10.4 years, ranging from 37 to 80 years. In-hospital events [death and Q-wave myocardial infarction] occurred at a similar frequency in both groups. Outcomes at twelve months were also similar between the groups with cumulative clinical MACE at one-year follow-up of 9.6% and 11.3% in the DES-in-BMS and the DES-in-DES groups, respectively [p value = 0.702]. Although not significant, there was a trend toward a higher TVR rate in the intra-DES ISR group as compared to the intra-BMS ISR group [0.9% BMS vs. 5.2% DES; pvalue = 0.16]. Our study suggests that the outcome of the patients presenting with ISR did not seem to be different between the two groups of DES-in-DES and DES-in-BMS at one-year follow-up, except for a trend toward more frequent TVR in the DES-in-DES group. Repeat DES implantation for DES restenosis could be feasible and safe with a relatively low incidence of MACE at mid-term follow-up