RESUMEN
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Primary hyperparathyroidism is a common endocrine disease and most cases are asymptomatic. Currently, in a hypercalcemic patient, the first laboratory investigation is serum primary hyperparathyroidism measurement. However, the primary hyperparathyroidism level cannot be measured in many primary healthcare centers in our country. In addition, serum calcium levels are normal in normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism patients, even if most centers have serum calcium levels measured. Therefore, a simple and inexpensive laboratory biochemical marker is required for the diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism. Recently, the calcium/phosphorus ratio has been proposed as a suitable tool for diagnosing primary hyperparathyroidism. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of serum calcium/phosphorus ratio in primary hyperparathyroidism screening. METHODS: A total of 462 patients followed in our clinic with a diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism were reviewed in this retrospective study. Out of these patients, 148 with normal levels of serum parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphorus were selected as the control group. Serum calcium, corrected calcium, phosphorus, albumin, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and creatinine were evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of the calcium/phosphorus ratio was investigated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: There were 404 (87.4%) females and 58 (12.6%) males in the primary hyperparathyroidism group. Calcium, parathyroid hormone, and calcium/phosphorus ratio were significantly higher in primary hyperparathyroidism than in controls (p<0.001 for each). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses identified a cutoff value of 2.59 (3.35 if calcium and phosphorus are measured in mg/dL) for the calcium/phosphorus ratio, with a sensitivity of 90.5% and specificity of 93.2% (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The calcium/phosphorus ratio is a simple and inexpensive method for primary hyperparathyroidism screening when a cutoff value of 2.59 is used.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: We aimed to determine the roles of preoperative thyroid nodule diameter and volume in the prediction of malignancy. Subjects and methods: The medical records of patients who underwent thyroidectomy between January 2007 and December 2014 were reviewed. The nodule diameters were grouped as < 1 cm, 1-1.9 cm, 2-3.9 cm and ≥ 4 cm, and volume was grouped as > 5 cm3, 5-9.9 cm3 and > 10 cm3. ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve analysis was performed to find the optimal cutoff value of diameter and volume that can predict malignancy. Results: There were 5561 thyroid nodules in 2463 patients. Five hundred and forty (9.7%) nodules were < 1 cm, 2,413 (43.4%) were 1-1.9 cm, 1,600 (28.8%) were 2-3.9 cm and 1,008 (18.1%) were ≥ 4 cm. Malignancy rates were 25.6%,10.6%, 9.7% and 8.5% in nodules < 1 cm, 1-1.9 cm, 2-3.9 cm and ≥ 4 cm, respectively. When classified according to volume, 3,664 (65.9%) nodules were < 5 cm3, 594 (10.7%) were 5-9.9 cm3 and 1,303 (23.4%) were ≥ 10 cm3. The malignancy rates were 12.7%, 11.4% and 7.8% for the nodules < 5 cm3, 5-9.9 cm3 and ≥ 10 cm3, respectively (p < 0.001). In ROC curve analysis, an optimal cutoff value for diameter or volume that can predict malignancy in all thyroid nodules or nodules ≥ 4 cm could not be determined. Conclusion: In this surgical series, malignancy risk did not increase with increasing nodule diameter or volume. Although the volume of malignant nodules ≥ 4 cm was higher than that of benign nodules ≥ 4 cm, there was no optimal cutoff value. The diameter or volume of the nodule cannot be used to predict malignancy or decide on surgical resection.