RESUMEN
Background@#The purpose of the present study was to determine how long superior screws alone or in combination with posterior placement of metaglene screws protruding and penetrating into the scapular spine in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty affect the strength of thescapular spine in a fresh cadaveric scapular model. @*Methods@#Seven fresh cadaver scapulas were allocated to the control group (short posterior and superior screws) and seven scapulars to thestudy group (spine base fixation with a four long screws, three with both long superior and long posterior screws). @*Results@#The failure load was lower in the spine fixation group (long screw, 869 N vs. short screw, 1,123 N); however, this difference did notreach statistical significance (p>0.05). All outside-in long superior or superior plus posterior screws failed due to scapular spine base fracture; failures in the short screw group were due to acromion fracture. An additional posterior outside-in screw failed to significantly decrease the failure load of the acromion spine. @*Conclusions@#The present study highlights the significance of preventing a cortical breach or an outside-in configuration when a superioror posterior screw is inserted into the scapular spine base.
RESUMEN
Background@#The purpose of the present study was to determine how long superior screws alone or in combination with posterior placement of metaglene screws protruding and penetrating into the scapular spine in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty affect the strength of thescapular spine in a fresh cadaveric scapular model. @*Methods@#Seven fresh cadaver scapulas were allocated to the control group (short posterior and superior screws) and seven scapulars to thestudy group (spine base fixation with a four long screws, three with both long superior and long posterior screws). @*Results@#The failure load was lower in the spine fixation group (long screw, 869 N vs. short screw, 1,123 N); however, this difference did notreach statistical significance (p>0.05). All outside-in long superior or superior plus posterior screws failed due to scapular spine base fracture; failures in the short screw group were due to acromion fracture. An additional posterior outside-in screw failed to significantly decrease the failure load of the acromion spine. @*Conclusions@#The present study highlights the significance of preventing a cortical breach or an outside-in configuration when a superioror posterior screw is inserted into the scapular spine base.