Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 33(4): 470-476, July-Aug. 2007. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-465782

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy is well tolerated by patients but the lack of an effective marker to predict pain prevents us from determining pre-procedurally which patient group needs local anesthesia for biopsy and probe pain. Thus in this study, we investigated predictor factors for prostate biopsy and probe insertion pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 71 patients who were undergoing prostate biopsy without anesthesia were included in the study retrospectively. Pain had been assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). Digital rectal examination (DRE) pain was analyzed for biopsy and probe insertion pain. RESULTS: DRE pain was related to both probe pain and biopsy pain. CONCLUSION: Although level of pain during DRE determines patients in need of local anesthesia, since the number of patients with moderate-severe pain is rather big, it seems efficient in determining the patients in need of additional anesthesia due to probe pain.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anestesia Local/métodos , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Tacto Rectal/efectos adversos , Dolor/prevención & control , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Tacto Rectal/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor/etiología , Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA