RESUMEN
Abstract The study aimed to compare the adherence of Brazilian and Italian pediatric dentists to the biosafety measures and operative protocols recommended by the health authorities during COVID-19 pandemic and to classify the participants according to their risk of infection. An online questionnaire with 34 questions about sociodemographic and occupational data, dental practice organization, biological risk management, and clinical operative protocols was sent to Brazilian and Italian pediatric dentists using a convenience sampling strategy. Chi-square test and multivariate analysis (two-step cluster) were performed (α = 5%). Of 641 respondents (377 Brazilians and 264 Italians), most were female (94% and 70%, respectively), aged 20-39 years (63%), with over 10 years of professional experience (58% and 49%, respectively). Based on adherence to recommended biosafety measures, participants were classified as "safer" (n = 219) or "less safe" (n = 422). Adherence to recommended protocols by the majority of participants resulted in low contagion rates (Brazilians = 5%; Italians = 12.5%). Participants with extensive professional experience in the dental setting exhibited a greater tendency to implement multiple adaptations (three or more) in their practice. Most participants (Brazilians = 92%; Italians = 80.7%) adopted the recommended minimal intervention dentistry approaches, with the use of fissure sealants and the use of non-rotary instruments for caries removal the most frequently techniques used among Brazilians (36%) and Italians (66%), respectively. Two different profiles of pediatric dentists were identified based on the biosafety protocols adopted during the pandemic. In addition, changes were implemented in the dental care provided to children, with focus on the minimal intervention dentistry.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT To evaluate the ability of temporary cement (TC) and gutta-percha sticks (GP) to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal through the coronal seal after pulpectomy. Eighty artificial primary maxillary central incisors were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups: TC (n = 40) and GP (n = 40). Endodontic access, rotary instrumentation, root canal filling, and coronal sealing were performed according to group allocation. The root canal opening was seeded with S. mutans and E. faecalis. Both groups were subdivided into 5 experimental time points (24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours), with 8 specimens per time-point group: 5 in which both root canal filling and coronal sealing were performed (with either TC or GP) and 3 controls (coronal sealing alone, without root canal filling). All specimens were incubated in an anaerobic jar at 37°C, and bacterial contamination was assessed in a spectrophotometer. ANOVA (t-test) was used to compare contamination and the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare filling scores between the experimental groups. A significant difference was observed in sealing in the first 24 hours between GP and controls (p = 0.046). There was no significant difference in the filling pattern between canals sealed with TC versus GP. Specimens sealed with GP showed less contamination than controls in the first 24 hours. At later time points, neither GP nor TC were effective at controlling bacterial contamination; both failed to provide adequate coronal sealing.
RESUMO Avaliar a capacidade do obturador provisório (OP) e da gutapercha em bastão (GP) de prevenir a contaminação bacteriana dos condutos radiculares. Foram selecionados 80 incisivos centrais superiores decíduos artificiais que foram divididos aleatoriamente em 2 grupos: OP (n = 40) e GP (n = 40). Foi realizado acesso endodôntico, instrumentação rotatória, preenchimento do canal radicular e selamento coronário conforme os grupos. Foi feita a semeadura de S.mutans e E. faecalis na entrada do canal radicular. Ambos os grupos foram subdivididos em 5 tempos experimentais (24, 48, 72, 96 e 120 horas), com 8 espécimes por tempo experimental: 5 submetidos a preenchimento do canal radicular e selamento coronário (com OP ou GP) e 3 controles (apenas selamento coronário, sem preenchimento do canal). Todos os espécimes foram incubados em jarras de anaerobiose a 37°C e a contaminação bacteriana foi avaliada em espectrofotômetro. Utilizou-se ANOVA (teste t) para a comparação da contaminação e o teste de Kruskal-Wallis para a comparação dos escores da obturação entre os grupos experimentais. Foi observada diferença significativa no selamento nas primeiras 24 horas entre GP e controles (p = 0,046). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa no padrão de preenchimento entre os canais selados com OP versus GP. Os espécimes selados com GP apresentaram menor contaminação do que os controles nas primeiras 24 horas. Nos demais tempos experimentais, tanto GP quanto OP não foram eficientes no controle da contaminação bacteriana; ambos apresentaram falha no selamento coronário.