Effect of cariogenic challenge on the degradation of adhesive-dentin interfaces

Abstract The aim was to evaluate, in vitro, the influence of pH cycling on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) and percentage of nanoleakage (%NL) in the dentin-adhesive interface. Flat dentin surfaces were obtained in 56 extracted third molars. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n=14): G1- Single Bond Universal (etch-and-rinse mode); G2- Single Bond Universal (self-etch mode); G3- Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; G4- Clearfil SE Bond. A block of composite was built on the adhesive area. Eight tooth/resin sets were cut parallel to the tooth's long axis to obtain 48 beams (0.8 mm2) for each group. Half of the beams were submitted to four cycles of pH cycling (demineralizing solution for 6 h and remineralizing solution for 18 h). The samples were submitted to µTBS test in a universal testing machine. Six tooth/resin sets were cut parallel to the tooth's long axis to obtain three slices of the central region (1.0 mm thickness). Half of the slices were submitted to pH cycling. The nanoleakage methodology was applied to obtain the %NL at the adhesive interfaces. According to two-way ANOVA, the interaction between factors (adhesive system x storage) was significant (p=0.0001) for µTBS and %NL. After pH cycling, there was a significant decrease in µTBS and a significant increase in %NL for all adhesives. The adhesives applied in the self-etch mode obtained lower %NL, differing significantly from the etch-and-rinse adhesives. It was concluded that the pH cycling negatively influenced the µTBS and %NL for all adhesives evaluated. However, self-etch adhesives allowed less %NL.

Resumo O objetivo foi avaliar, in vitro, a influência da ciclagem de pH na resistência de união à microtração (RUµT) e na porcentagem de nanoinfiltração (%NI) na interface dentina-adesivo. Superfícies planas em dentina foram obtidas em 56 terceiros molares. Os dentes foram aleatoriamente divididos em quatro grupos (n=14): G1- Single Bond Universal (condicionamento ácido prévio); G2- Single Bond Universal (autocondicionante); G3- Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; G4- Clearfil SE Bond. Bloco de resina composta foi construído sobre o adesivo. Oito conjuntos dente/resina foram cortados paralelamente ao longo eixo do dente para obter 48 palitos (0,8 mm2) para cada grupo. Metade dos palitos foi submetida a quatro ciclos de ciclagem de pH (solução desmineralizadora por 6 h e solução remineralizadora por 18 h). As amostras foram submetidas ao teste de RUµT em máquina de ensaio universal. Seis conjuntos dente/resina foram cortados paralelamente ao longo eixo para obter três fatias da região central (1,0 mm de espessura). Metade das fatias foi submetida à ciclagem de pH. A metodologia de nanoinfitração foi aplicada para obter a %NI nas interfaces. De acordo com ANOVA de duas vias, interação entre os fatores (adesivo x armazenamento) foi significativa (p=0.0001) para for RUµT e %NI. Após ciclagem de pH, houve redução significativa na RUµT e aumento significativo na %NI para todos adesivos. Os adesivos aplicados na técnica autocondicionante obtiveram menor %NI, diferindo significativamente dos adesivos com condicionamento ácido prévio. Concluiu-se que a ciclagem de pH influenciou negativamente a RUµT e a %NI para todos adesivos. Contudo, adesivos autocondicionantes permitiram menor %NI.

Effect of grape seed extract-containing phosphoric acid formulations on bonding to enamel and dentin

Abstract The aim was to evaluate the effect of 2% grape seed extract (GSE) containing phosphoric acid (PhA) on the bond strength to enamel and dentin. The control group was 37% PhA. The following three PhA formulations with 2% GSE and 20% ethanol were obtained: GSE5 = 5% PhA; GSE10 = 10% PhA; and GSE20 = 20% PhA. The enamel and dentin surfaces of molars were etched with the acid solutions, followed by Scotchbond Multi-Purpose adhesive and composite resin application. The tensile bond strength (TBS) test evaluated the bond to enamel after 24 h, and the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) test evaluated the bond to dentin after 24 h and 12-month water storage. Etched enamel and dentin were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), respectively. The TBS data were submitted to one-way ANOVA, while µTBS data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The TBS (MPa) to enamel did not significantly differ among the control (48.1 ± 15.7), GSE5 (46.1 ± 9.6), GSE10 (49.8 ± 13.6) and GSE20 (44.1 ± 11.9) groups (p = 0.537). The µTBS (MPa) to dentin of the control (28.4 ± 14.4) and GSE20 (24.1 ± 8.1) groups were significantly higher than those of the GSE5 (16.8 ± 7.4) and GSE10 (17.5 ± 6.6) groups at 24 h (p < 0.006). After 12-month storage, only GSE5 (21.0 ± 7.8) and GSE10 (17.6 ± 8.0) did not show significantly decreased μTBS (p > 0.145). SEM micrographs showed a shallower enamel etching pattern for GSE5. AFM images showed the formation of collagenous globular structures for GSE5 and GSE10. The different acid solutions did not influence the TBS to enamel, and the µTBS to dentin was stable over time when dentin was etched with GSE5 and GSE10.